Tag Archives: deflation

The GDP Paradox

07 Friday Jul 2017

Posted by in The GDP Paradox, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is said to be a estimate of a nations economic growth. How a country’s GDP is calculated is using the following formula:

GDP = C + G + I + NX.

“C” is equal to all private Consumption, or Consumer spending in a nation’s economy, “G” is the sum of Government spending,  “I” is the sum of all the country’s investment, including businesses capital expenditures & “NX” is the Nation’s total net exports, calculated as total exports minus total imports (NX = Exports – Imports).

Where this formula gets it totally wrong is it just assumes private consumption (C) is equal to consumer spending & the total business Investment (I) is an addition, which is failing to account for the sum of principal + interest payed out of a forever deficient volume of  circulation only ever comprised of some remaining principal.

As a result this is likewise failing to conclude that most if not all government expenditure (G) is not investing taxation into any nation, but instead perpetually reintroducing or laundering the principal & interest formerly stolen out of circulation in all private debt back into circulation again as an ever greater escalation of government debt. This is in fact what funds government expenditure, apposed to taxation that is likewise paid out of circulation — either directly or indirectly into the banks coffers to service the ever greater escalations of government debt.

Although GDP accounts for imports & exports (NX) this only accounts for just one variable of reflation & deflation under banking.

Therefore what makes GDP an insane contradictory paradox is firstly it is adding the sum of deflation instead of subtracting it which irrationally estimates growth based upon non-existent inflation, & secondly even if we did have inflation you can not just assume any existence of inflation is a true indicator of growth either.

“Real growth, however, can only be determined when any increase in circulation is always equal to remaining debt & always equal to represented property value, where there quite literally is no inflation or deflation.”

So too is Debt-to-GDP misleading not only because the GDP aggregate itself is failing to subtract what it is always adding, but the debt is only referencing government debt apposed to all debt including private debt. It is assumed a low Debt-to-GDP ratio indicates a country is producing enough to service its debt without incurring further debt, which is mathematically impossible regardless so long as we are all paying the added cost of interest in private debt. This is in effect what artificially inflates prices by however much interest we pay out of circulation above the sum of principal just spending money today, that is at any given point in time deflationary (circulatory deflation) in regards to the remaining volume of circulation always available to industry & commerce.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 07, 2017, last edit Nov 11, 2017)

 

Is buying local beneficial to anyone under the ruse of banking

03 Monday Jul 2017

Posted by in Is buying local beneficial to anyone under the ruse of banking

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Regardlesslocal buisnessss where you spend money the value of our production we give up to each other, that all money records, evidences & represents is stolen by banks in  private debt, predominantly in the form of  purported loans that dont ethically or even rationally transpire in the first place, simply because banks neither risk or give up consideration of commensurable value from the banks otherwise prior legitimate possession.

If anyone wants further evidence of this monumental crime of theft  look no further than the added cost of interest passed onto the consumer in the resulting price of goods & services, which steals all that much further from each & everyone of us in artificial price inflation just spending money today, whether its purchasing from a small business, big business, foreign or local. Either way industry & commerce is passing the added cost of interest above the cost of principal inclusive onto you the consumer.

Logically earned Profit for any business is what you the consumer pays above the principal & interest purchasing whatever which is servicing someone else’s purported loan. Therefore you the consumer are subsequently paying principal + interest out of circulation spending money, plus the earned profit of course when the business purchases whatever with that earned profit, only to service someone else’s purported loan once again.

So regardless who you are or where you spend money, whether its expanding business, purchasing a third holiday home or just putting food on the table & buying clothes for your children — its ALWAYS YOU the consumer who is servicing that falsified debt to a thieving bank just spending money today.

Of course the small business proprietor who wrote that message on the blackboard above is blinded by greed & desire to a point he cant even see he is passing  the added cost of a monumental crime of theft onto his customers, making him no different to the CEO thats buying his third holiday home.

If anything the CEO is paying more out of circulation, but this does not change the fact that all small business is doing the exact same thing, only to have any or all profit stolen when its further spent into circulation.

So the question remains is buying local beneficial for anyone?

Well,,, if you have read & understood what I have already written above you would have to be a village idiot to believe buying local ever could under the ruse of banking.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 03, 2017, last edit July 09, 2017)

Where is the banks proof of claim?

03 Monday Jul 2017

Posted by in Where is the banks proof of claim?

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Q: How can you simply identify those who want nothing more but to preserve the monumental crime of theft imposed by purported banking?

A: Well its quite simple really just identify all those who would have you actually believe banks create & or loan money in the first place, yet cant even prove or demonstrate what consideration of commensurable value banks or mere publishers (public or private) either risk or give up to otherwise justify the banks purported creation of OUR money, or any purported loan to one of us.

If these individuals cant provide PROOF OF CLAIM (ie:consideration of value) but just blindly insist banks create & or loan you money its quite clear these individuals want to preserve a monumental crime of theft, which is more often than less for their own personal gain at your expense — even when banks themselves cant or will not provide proof of claim for one blatantly obvious reason, because they dont give up consideration of value that would otherwise be proof of claim. Not even in a Freedom of Information request we put to the Bank of England back in 2011.

Generally you will find these individuals selling books, promoting their web sites & the web sites of others that dont even provide any rational proof of claim, but instead rife with mere unqualified assumptions, contradiction, half truths & barefaced lies. Some selling non-solution that can only divide & confuse people even further, but ensuring the theft continues for long as humanly possible until mankind finally succumbs to ultimate destruction. Not just by the hand of bankers & politicians, but all those who are knowingly selling you these lies that preserves this monumental crime of theft for their own personal gain, fame or glory of course, making all those propagating these lies & division no better than bankers & politicians.

MAKE NO MISTAKE : BANKS OR MERE PUBLISHERS WHO PRINT MONEY NEVER HAVE OR EVER WILL CREATE MONEY, BECAUSE WE THE PEOPLE DO. WE ALWAYS HAVE BY GIVING UP THE ONLY COMMENSURABLE CONSIDERATION OF VALUE BEFORE ANY DEPOSIT WHICH INCLUDES A PROMISSORY OBLIGATION THAT HAS LAWFUL CONSIDERATION OF COMMENSURABLE VALUE , BEFORE ANY BOOK ENTRY, BEFORE PUBLICATION OF MONEY,  WHICH LOGICALLY MEANS THERE NEVER WAS OR EVER IS ANY LOAN OR BORROWING OF MONEY. NOT FROM BANKS, NOT FROM MERE PUBLISHERS, NOT EVEN BETWEEN THE PEOPLE TO EACH OTHER, SIMPLY BECAUSE IT IS WE THE PEOPLE WHO CREATE MONEY — PERIOD.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)


(Published : July 03, 2017, last edit July 08, 2017)

 

Can mathematics predict peoples actions?

02 Sunday Jul 2017

Posted by in Can mathematics predict peoples actions

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Absolutely not, HOWEVER mathematics can be logically applied to determine certain outcomes from peoples actions.

DETERMINE : 1.cause (something) to occur in a particular way or to have a particular nature. 2.ascertain or establish exactly by research or calculation

PREDICT: say or *estimate* (roughly calculate) that a specified thing will happen in the future or will be a consequence of something.

DETERMINE EXAMPLE : If people are paying *principal + interest* out of a forever deficient circulation comprised of only *some remaining principal at most* in all all their personal falsified debts one can then logically determine (NOT PREDICT) by applying primary school mathematics & rudimentary logic that so long as people are paying the added cost of interest above the sum of principal its mathematically impossible to ever have inflation. Determining further that the added cost of unwarranted interest is in fact deflationary or a decrease in value by however much interest you pay above the sum of principal in artificial price inflation that steals even further from us when we spend money, merely artificially sustained by further borrowing (alleged) or purported loans that dont ethically or rationally transpire if the purported lender is neither risking or giving up commensurable consideration of value.

PREDICT EXAMPLE: Banks create & loan money regardless if they risk or give up commensurable consideration & regardless if the sum of interest is neither created or issued into circulation above the sum of principal the interest is nonetheless a surplus of value, therefore price inflation is just the result of printing too much money.

CONCLUSION
Therefore we are not predicting, estimating or roughly calculating anything in Mathematically Perfected Economy, much less are we basing any calculation on mere unsubstantiated assumptions bereft of any formal proof. We are instead logically applying rudimentary principles (IE: 1.1.1 ratio) in extending the mathematics from one point to another to determine, establish, or exactly ascertain a particular occurrence or event if those principles are strictly adhered to.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : June 02, 2017, last edit October 20, 2017)

 

FOI request to the Bank of England

01 Saturday Jul 2017

Posted by in FOI request to the Bank of England

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This is the Freedom Of Information request we put to the Bank of England back in 2011 at asking 4 simple questions

1) What lawful consideration do you claim the BoE gives up when it creates money ?
2) How then does the bank (or does the bank) claim there is a debt to the bank ?
3) What is the claim to interest then, when the bank can do no more than absorb the costs of merely publishing evidence of our promissory obligations *to each other* ?
4) How is it possible even to maintain a vital circulation without accumulating inevitably terminal sums of debt ?

Note: The end result was of course as usual “EVASION”.

You can put these questions to any bank, even peripheral banks . Try it & you will basically get the same response . They will evade answering these questions particularly the first knowing all too well if they do it will be self incriminating or admitting to theft.

Think about it — If they’re not stealing in the form of pretend loans they would simply answer the damn questions wouldn’t they? but their pathetic excuse for not answering them is that these questions are unintelligible. In the end the BoE claimed the expense they would have to forgo finding the answers to these simple questions would be too costly for them. Too costly for them alright because if they answered the questions it would end their crime of theft & they damn well know it.

All they have to do is answer the first question really, because if they can prove they give up consideration of commensurable value in the creation or any loan of money the following questions are made redundant, except question 4 of course, simply due the current escalations of debt, which they then have to explain how & why is not terminal, which we already know they cant answer, because no one on this planet can prove or demonstrate how the sum of interest is created & issued into circulation above the sum of principal that takes us back to question 1 again. In retrospect questions 2, 3 & 4 take you back to question 1, which is why its the first question, that’s hardly unintelligible.

Its really a YES or NO answer to the first question. Do you give up consideration of value in the creation of money? . Is your answer YES or NO?. If your answer is YES what consideration are you then giving up in the creation of money ? but they refuse to even do that. Unintelligible my arse — The question couldn’t be any more simpler.

We are only asking the bank the same question we would otherwise ask ourselves to identify who exactly is creating money, determining then if any loan transpires or not. So If anyone of us was asked if we give up consideration of value in the creation of money the answer would be logically YES, & if asked what consideration are we giving up — pure observation alone tells anyone with a half a brain that we are giving up our labour & production that has the only lawful consideration of commensurable value.

So if it is we who create all new money, which we have already proven to be the case for nearly 50 years already, predominately by the purchaser who issues a promissory obligation/note before publication, before any subsequent deposit — so how is it even ethically or rationally possible for the “obligor” (creator of money) to borrow what has not yet been paid & or deposited from the resulting sale?

The simple answer its not possible. To suggest we loan or borrow money from each other defies all logic & reason — putting the cart before the horse. Indicating further we are not even loaning or borrowing money from each other either, much less from a thieving bank. When the unadulterated debt is merely an obligation by the *obligor* to “pay & retire” the principal, free from exploitation or unjust intervention.

Make no mistake MPE is NOT claiming there is no debt,  simply because the only debt that transpires is the true debt we have  to each other. Therefore the argument is not to somehow get out of paying the debt altogether, but instead the intent to restore today’s falsified debts (phony loans) to their original unadulterated state where there never is any loan or borrowing.

For detailed correspondence regarding this FOI request please visit WhatDoTheyKnow. OR HERE.

Please note “whatdotheyknow” have since taken down the detailed correspondence which can only be perceived as further EVASION of the facts.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

 

(Published : July 01, 2017, last edit January 19, 2019)

 

Buffoonery of Pretended Economists

01 Saturday Jul 2017

Posted by in Buffoonery of Pretended Economists, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The purported economist (Richard Werner) in the video below is contradicting himself every which way to justify the lie banks create & loan money, & in all insanity this buffoon is suggesting this money is created out of nothing or thin air, which could not be any further from the truth.

Its all quite simple if you stick to the verifiable facts without contradicting or compromising those facts.

Lets be very clear banks do not create money, NOT EVER, not just because banks or mere publishers give up no consideration of commensurable value but because we the people are creating this money all along instead by giving up the only consideration of commensurable value, so what can those of us who are sound mind logically conclude from this simple observation of verifiable fact?

1) Banks are logically not creating money because the bank is neither risking or giving the consideration of value you give up, which is hardly thin air, nothing or fictitious.

2) Banks are logically not loaning you *YOUR* money because the bank neither risks or gives up consideration of value from its otherwise prior legitimate possession to even rationally justify any loan from the bank to you, much less the taking of interest.

3) Banks are logically not purchasing or borrowing your promissory note / security / money because the bank neither risks or gives up consideration of value to otherwise rationally justify any purchase between you & the bank took place, much less any loan from you to the bank.

4) Banks are logically stealing the value of our production we give up to each other in any trade or transaction , ”X2″ due to unwarranted interest by simply pretending to loan all the money WE CREATE (principal only) into circulation in the first place. In other words the purported loan is not a loan at all, neither ethically or rationally, but instead a monumental crime of theft.

5) Logically economist Richard Werner & associates (phony experts in economy) & usury media alike are throwing the baby out with the bathwater to irrationally justify an oxymoron (ie: banks create money out of nothing) & a myriad of other barefaced LIES thereafter as a result.

Do not be fooled by these 11th hour pretenders folks. To irrationally suggest banks create money from nothing is to likewise suggest banks are stealing nothing, which is denying a monumental crime of theft.

So no matter how these buffoons obscure the facts the purported loan never transpires anyway, not from the bank to one of us, nor from one of us to the bank. No legitimate sale ever transpires between the bank or anyone because the business of banking is not commerce but piracy. Whichever way you look at this however distorted by pretend economists the bank gives up no commensurable consideration of value from its otherwise prior legitimate possession in any debt, trade, sale or transaction. Therefore the purported loan is a monumental crime of theft, subsequently stealing the value WE THE PEOPLE give to all money & property that is hardly nothing or thin air.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 01, 2017, last edit July 27, 2017)

Promise vs IOU

01 Saturday Jul 2017

Posted by in Money vs IOU

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Neither is a promissory note a IOU, because a promissory note is often in most cases a unilateral promise, which is the “offer” (not owing) of a promise (money) to a true creditor who gives up property, or vice versa when the true creditor offers something in exchange for a promise (money) , & if the true creditor accepts that promise in the offer its paid then & there in full on the transaction (true debt). Think of this when you are simply purchasing an item in a shop.

However in case of an obligor (maker, creator & issuer of a promise / promissory note/ money) there may be an obligation by the obligor to do something else arising from their issuance of a promissory note in what is a “promissory obligation”before any book entry or deposit. Such as not only paying the true creditor in full thereafter from the outset, but giving up a like equal measure of the obligor’s own future production in return for anothers (true creditor) production to rightly retire that promise (money). As a matter of money (promise) becoming defunct in fulfilling the obligation, meaning the promise (money) no longer represents value, nor any remaining debt or consumption in fulfillment of an obligation.

The very concept of an IOU is therefore a rational impossibility if there is no loan, much less is there any loan from a bank, & we are instead GIVING up our production to each other, expecting no more than what we give up in return, which may include “earned profit ” by the way , ” cost plus labour “, hence we giving up our ” labour & production ” to each other, where there otherwise are no loans or borrowing.  So if it has not dawned on the reader already ” earned profit ” is what the proprietor takes above the principal & interest (unearned profit) in the resulting price of goods & services which is instead paid to a thieving bank who purports to loan us the sum of principal in the first place.

The illusion of a loan is of course born out of minds of men & women blinded by greed & desire. The very idea of purportedly borrowing more to merely service the former sum of falsified debt only to increase every new sum of falsified debt amounts to a heroin addict trying to kick the habit by upping their dose on every hit.

” Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”
~Albert Einstein

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)


(Published : July 01, 2017, last edit September 16, 2017)

 

The Growth Paradox under the ruse of banking

01 Saturday Jul 2017

Posted by in The Growth Paradox under the ruse of banking

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

QLD finacial minister

Queensland Treasurer predicts the State will have the strongest growing economy in Australia.

How is it even rationally possible to have growth if any increase in production is entirely dedicated to service but never pay down an irreversible multiplication of artificial debt caused by the volumetric impropriety of interest?

I mean you would have to be a blithering idiot to even remotely suggest growth is attainable so long we are all paying interest.

Sure the QLD treasure (Curtis Pitt) is predicting otherwise growth because this sociopath knows all too well he is artificiality sustaining this lie of economy in Queensland by playing his part in laundering already stolen money (formerly stolen in private debt) back into circulation as an increase in state debt (public debt) to pay for the commonwealth games commencing in 2018.

Of course anyone with half a brain can see production is increasing in preparation for the commonwealth games, however what most people refuse to see including treasure Curtis Pitt who clearly failed primary school maths is nonetheless the consequential increase in state debt that is not only paying for this but its mathematically impossible to pay down regardless of any surplus , yet I ask how can this increase in production be any remote indication of growth if the value of all production including any increase in production is owed to a thief (bank) at further interest again?

Concluding you would have to village idiot to ever suggest growth is even remotely attainable under the ruse of banking. Its simply mathematically impossible so long as we are all paying the added cost of interest not only on all our personal falsified debts, but as a consequence when each & everyone of us spends money.

And where will this sociopath be in 2022-24 when this growth paradox or LIE of economy falls flat on its face in the coming second greater world wide depression when industry & commerce can no longer service the very thing he & every political betrayer omits in their unfounded preposterous assertions?

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 01, 2017, last edit July 09, 2017)

 

The share market paradox

01 Saturday Jul 2017

Posted by in The share market paradox

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Share markets are only ever artificially sustained by further borrowing (alleged loans) which is mathematically impossible to pay down due to the volumetric impropriety of interest (PERPETUAL DEFLATION) .

Therefore any AAA rating is entirely artificial based on any nations ability to maintain or service the ever greater escalations of falsified debt in perpetual cycles of reflation, yet never ever paying it down.

Point blank regardless of any increase in production under the ruse of banking you have no growth so long as you are all paying principal & interest out of a volume of a circulation thats only ever comprised of some remaining principal at most, not only on all your personal falsified debts (phony loans), regardless if its to purchase a home, shares or whatever, but as consequence its stealing however much interest we pay above the sum of principal inclusive, which is stealing all that much further from each & everyone of us in just spending money today.

Whats so difficult to comprehend HERE folks?

So long as you are all paying the added cost of interest in “artificial price inflation” the primary school mathematics is clearly telling us you have DEFLATION or a DECREASE IN VALUE per goods & services (per representation) by however much interest you pay out of a general circulation above the sum of principal, which is a circulation that only ever consists of some remaining principal at the very most, even upon further cycles of reflation in any increase in debt, whether its public or private, which never ever increases the remaining circulation above the sum of principal that it initially was intended to represent.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 01, 2017, last edit July 09, 2017)

 

What is the purpose of War?

01 Saturday Jul 2017

Posted by in What is the purpose of War

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

All wars are bankers wars, simply because all politicians, no exceptions work for & represent banks (thieves).

“War is a racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits [unearned] are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.”
~Smedley Butler

If the truth was to be ever told & it has for over 47 years already I might add,,War is one of many ways to perpetually reflate a forever volumetric deficiency in any nations monetary circulation, due the very interest we the people pay out of a volume of circulation only ever comprised of some remaining principal at most, paid out not just on our personal falsified debts to thieving banks, but every time we personally spend money (price inflation), only to be re-borrowed (allegedly borrowed [laundered]) back by political betrayers as an irreversible multiplication of federal debt & spent once again by these traitors on things such as unnecessary WAR, yet a necessity to perpetually reflate circulation that can only irreversibly multiply artificial debt into oblivion, until such time industry & commerce can no longer service this ever escalating artificial debt where all of you one by one will be dispossessed of all your property & wealth in the coming second greater depression & possibly plunged into WW3.

“Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.”
~ Henry Kissinger

The very idea of purportedly borrowing more to merely service the former sum of artificial debt only to increase every new sum of artificial debt amounts to a heroin addict trying kick the habit by upping their dose on every hit.

” Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”
~Albert Einstein

For example the primary means of reflation for the U.S is to spend the money banks formerly steal from the people in phony loans on invading other nations, via a process of perpetual reflation as every increase in government debt, even giving purported defense aid to other nations, financing terrorists groups across the globe, supplying extremists with tactical weapons, guns, & some with Biological & Nuclear weapons of mass destruction.

“Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America nor, for that matter, in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship. … Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”
~Hermann Göring

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 01, 2017, last edit July 09, 2017)