Tag Archives: mandate

What is debt free money.

29 Thursday Oct 2020

Posted by in Uncategorized, What is debt free money

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Debt free money is a rational impossibility simply because all money pays a debt.

(Debt free money = Oxymoron).

Loan free money however is rationally possible because the true creator of all new money is always the debtor, predominately the obligor who is a debtor nonetheless.

(Loan free money = Interest free money).

” Contrary to the common misconception that otherwise suggests banks create & or loan money they in fact don’t, never have, or ever will, simply because they have no proof of claim . To be very clear not one bank on the face of this planet can prove or even demonstrate what consideration of commensurable value they would either risk or give up from their otherwise prior legitimate possession.”

Often people will equate “debt free money” to “interest free money” which is false, omitting the evidential fact there never was or ever is any loan. They do this simply because they irrationally believe the solution is where the government can legitimately create & or legitimately loan the principal free from the imposition of interest — without taking into deliberation the government, much like all private banks are NOT the debtor (obligor), nor the true creditor (someone that is legitimately giving up property to the debtor in exchange for money) who are giving up commensurable value to each other from their otherwise prior legitimate possession.

Make no mistake. Under the ruse of banking (public or private) that pretends to create & loan money  “governments” are neither legitimate buyers (debtors) nor legitimate sellers (creditors), nor are they legitimate lenders if they give up no consideration of value from their otherwise prior legitimate possession.

Of course in a world without thieving banks or unjust intervention (public or private) the debtor simply “pays & retires” the principal without the imposition of unwarranted interest.

In other words under MPE nothing comes for free. It is the debtor who always pays the true creditor in full for whatever regardless, & only then it’s the “debtor’s obligation” that initially creates the principal (new money) to go out & earn that principal to therefore redeem that principal, so it can be rightfully retired or deleted from the monetary system.

The result is NO deflation, NO reflation, nor any inflation if the principal is rightfully retired equal to depreciation or consumption of the related property (see the mathematics).

Please note: One could argue “circulatory deflation” occurs under MPE when the principal is retired & “circulatory inflation/reflation”  likewise occurs when new money is created upon new represented property, however it’s important to understand so long as we are retiring the principal at the rate of depreciation or consumption of the related property these fluctuations are irrelevant comparative to the terminal cycles of deflation & reflation caused by interest today.

Within this whole process the only “True Debt” we have to each other always remains so long as we are “giving” up our production to each other, simply trading that production, & or as a matter of money being further spent within the monetary circulation until such time that principal is rightfully retired by the debtor (obligor), however it’s important to note here there are NO loans, NO borrowing, NO paying back anyone.

(Loan free money = Interest free money).

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : Oct 29, 2020, Edit:Jan27,2021)

Comment etiquette please

 

Surplus vs Deficit

08 Wednesday Nov 2017

Posted by in Surplus vs Deficit

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

To comprehend the basic concept of any Surplus or Deficit  is to firstly be aware the overall sum of falsified debt under the ruse of banking is rising in either instance.

To likewise comprehend any surplus attained by government is to be aware the surplus is temporarily balancing government debt at any given point in time, but never ever paying it down primarily due to the volumetric impropriety of interest imposed on all private debt — that sets off these terminal cycles of perpetual deflation & subsequent cycles of perpetual reflation that increases the overall sum of falsified debt.

SURPLUS: Is when the government has attained an excess of public revenue via taxation, sales of public land / infrastructure etc that is equal & or above the necessary payments servicing government debt. In other words the surplus is a sum of money that is left over only after political betrayers have balanced government debt, otherwise referred to in the political arena as balancing the budget, contrary to the suggestive lie pushed by usury media that otherwise assumes any surplus means the government has paid off government debt.

DEFICIT: Is when the government has simply not attained enough public revenue to balance government debt. What this simply means the government is not meeting their obligation servicing the former sum of government debt, much less ever paying down any new sum of debt due to the added cost of interest.

CONCLUSION
Therefore regardless of any surplus or deficit the government budget is taking even more from one or many sectors of today’s lie of economy & taking less from another, & or giving more to one sector & taking even more from another to cover the shortfall.

For example increasing social security payments at a greater cost in taxation that nonetheless exceeds the increasing cost of social security payments,  that can only at best keep on servicing the ever greater escalations of government debt without actually paying it down.

Other means & ways of saving public expenditure to balance any budget is by simply spending less on public infrastructure such as education, roads, public transport, hospitals etc & just increasing the overall costs of existing public services. Another might be increasing fuel taxes & giving pensioner discounts on various public services. In any case the government is always, always, always taking more & more from the people above the added cost of interest.

Of course with the assistance of usury media political betrayers will always sell the benefit to the people as a good thing, but will never disclose ultimately at what cost — which is taking even more public revenue from somewhere else that is always greater than the benefit itself provided in the budget.

A perfect example is election bribes seen in past governments here that just gave every Australian citizen earning less than 100K a year a one off payment of $900 in a purported stimulus package, & while everyone was rubbing their hands together the government is just quietly taking considerably more from the individual in increased motor vehicle registration fees, license renewals, rates, levies, taxes etc. With the added cost of interest artificially inflating prices all along the one off payment of $900 was hardly any consolation for the Aussie battler trying to make their mortgage payments, while the overall cost of living & housing was & still is going through the roof.

So not only is the added cost of interest artificially inflating prices the government is taking even more from us in increasing public revenue to service the greater escalations of government debt — that is caused by the unwarranted imposition of interest we pay out of circulation in private debt in the first place.

Any or all budgets under the ruse of banking amounts to nothing more than a dog & pony show, where the main event in is a dog chasing its tail. Politicians are basically cutting their nose off to spite their face in any or all budgets.

In truth any government surplus solves absolutely nothing under the ruse of banking, simply because it is only temporarily balancing the budget at an even greater cost to the nation on a whole.

It is what it is. So long as we’re all paying any rate of interest on our personal falsified debts, & or paying the added cost of interest just spending money today servicing someone else’s purported loan the budget is subsequently blown upon further cycles of deflation & reflation regardless.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : November 08, 2017, last edit November 08, 2017)

Is Australia Bankrupt?

04 Monday Sep 2017

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

You don’t have to be Albert Einstein to figure out every nation on the face of this planet is already bankrupt.

Its no secret bankruptcy is mathematically guaranteed — so long as we are all paying *principal + interest* out of a monetary circulation comprised of only some remaining *principal* at most.

Do the primary school mathematics yourselves folks. Its only a matter adding & subtracting, but these morons in finance, politics & usury media alike today cant even do that, which is clearly evident when they insistently blame one of the many symptoms as the cause of financial hardship instead.

Example : Principal = 10, Interest = 5.

10 − (10 + 5) = −5.

NOTE: The result is a negative 5, NOT a positive 5.

Anyone with half a brain should know if your sum debit (−) is greater than your sum credit (+) you are effectively BROKE.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : September 04, 2017, last edit September 04, 2017)

 

Global Debt

18 Tuesday Jul 2017

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

According to a review by the Bank or International Settlements (BIS) global debts public & private reached 100 trillion in mid-2013, & estimates today mid-2017 are well over 200 trillion.

As a matter of pure observation if global debt doubles up (irreversibly multiplies due to interest) every two or three years the global debt by 2019-20 will be around 400 trillion.

By 2023 it should be somewhere in excess of 1 quadrillion, but lets be conservative & say 800 trillion.

Now If the world hasn’t already entered into a hell fire economic depression of no return by 2023 it most definitely will by 2026 where the debt would have multiplied to around 1.6 quadrillion.

Of course if you believe in the infinite milk & honey fairy tail of today’s lie economy by 2029-30 it should be somewhere around 3.2 quadrillion.

I ask a simple question to the reader can you imagine the cost of living in just 10-15 years, or won’t we be living?

Think about it.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 18, 2017, last edit July 18, 2017)

 

The GDP Paradox

07 Friday Jul 2017

Posted by in The GDP Paradox, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is said to be a estimate of a nations economic growth. How a country’s GDP is calculated is using the following formula:

GDP = C + G + I + NX.

“C” is equal to all private Consumption, or Consumer spending in a nation’s economy, “G” is the sum of Government spending,  “I” is the sum of all the country’s investment, including businesses capital expenditures & “NX” is the Nation’s total net exports, calculated as total exports minus total imports (NX = Exports – Imports).

Where this formula gets it totally wrong is it just assumes private consumption (C) is equal to consumer spending & the total business Investment (I) is an addition, which is failing to account for the sum of principal + interest payed out of a forever deficient volume of  circulation only ever comprised of some remaining principal.

As a result this is likewise failing to conclude that most if not all government expenditure (G) is not investing taxation into any nation, but instead perpetually reintroducing or laundering the principal & interest formerly stolen out of circulation in all private debt back into circulation again as an ever greater escalation of government debt. This is in fact what funds government expenditure, apposed to taxation that is likewise paid out of circulation — either directly or indirectly into the banks coffers to service the ever greater escalations of government debt.

Although GDP accounts for imports & exports (NX) this only accounts for just one variable of reflation & deflation under banking.

Therefore what makes GDP an insane contradictory paradox is firstly it is adding the sum of deflation instead of subtracting it which irrationally estimates growth based upon non-existent inflation, & secondly even if we did have inflation you can not just assume any existence of inflation is a true indicator of growth either.

“Real growth, however, can only be determined when any increase in circulation is always equal to remaining debt & always equal to represented property value, where there quite literally is no inflation or deflation.”

So too is Debt-to-GDP misleading not only because the GDP aggregate itself is failing to subtract what it is always adding, but the debt is only referencing government debt apposed to all debt including private debt. It is assumed a low Debt-to-GDP ratio indicates a country is producing enough to service its debt without incurring further debt, which is mathematically impossible regardless so long as we are all paying the added cost of interest in private debt. This is in effect what artificially inflates prices by however much interest we pay out of circulation above the sum of principal just spending money today, that is at any given point in time deflationary (circulatory deflation) in regards to the remaining volume of circulation always available to industry & commerce.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 07, 2017, last edit Nov 11, 2017)

 

Is buying local beneficial to anyone under the ruse of banking

03 Monday Jul 2017

Posted by in Is buying local beneficial to anyone under the ruse of banking

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Regardlesslocal buisnessss where you spend money the value of our production we give up to each other, that all money records, evidences & represents is stolen by banks in  private debt, predominantly in the form of  purported loans that dont ethically or even rationally transpire in the first place, simply because banks neither risk or give up consideration of commensurable value from the banks otherwise prior legitimate possession.

If anyone wants further evidence of this monumental crime of theft  look no further than the added cost of interest passed onto the consumer in the resulting price of goods & services, which steals all that much further from each & everyone of us in artificial price inflation just spending money today, whether its purchasing from a small business, big business, foreign or local. Either way industry & commerce is passing the added cost of interest above the cost of principal inclusive onto you the consumer.

Logically earned Profit for any business is what you the consumer pays above the principal & interest purchasing whatever which is servicing someone else’s purported loan. Therefore you the consumer are subsequently paying principal + interest out of circulation spending money, plus the earned profit of course when the business purchases whatever with that earned profit, only to service someone else’s purported loan once again.

So regardless who you are or where you spend money, whether its expanding business, purchasing a third holiday home or just putting food on the table & buying clothes for your children — its ALWAYS YOU the consumer who is servicing that falsified debt to a thieving bank just spending money today.

Of course the small business proprietor who wrote that message on the blackboard above is blinded by greed & desire to a point he cant even see he is passing  the added cost of a monumental crime of theft onto his customers, making him no different to the CEO thats buying his third holiday home.

If anything the CEO is paying more out of circulation, but this does not change the fact that all small business is doing the exact same thing, only to have any or all profit stolen when its further spent into circulation.

So the question remains is buying local beneficial for anyone?

Well,,, if you have read & understood what I have already written above you would have to be a village idiot to believe buying local ever could under the ruse of banking.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 03, 2017, last edit July 09, 2017)

How do banks launder money?

02 Sunday Jul 2017

Posted by in How banks launder money, Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

It’s quite simple really, because what peripheral banks (eg: ANZ Bank) steal from you in phony loans & every time you spend money today is laundered into the hands of a central bank via what we are led to believe is inter-bank lending, where the central banks subsequently use this stolen money to purchase treasury bonds not only in your nation, but in other nations abroad that perpetually reflates any given nations deficient circulation with already stolen money.

One could say the practice of banking is a monumental crime of theft & with the help of treasonous political betrayers its one big money laundering racket, essentially moving stolen money all over the world generally through central banks to reflate a nations circulation with irreversible multiplications of national debt.

Of course central banks are not the only purchasers of national debt. Peripheral banks, banking corporations such as insurance & investment companies also purchase treasury bonds, & a small percentage of pension funds also that banks pilfer anyway when markets periodically drop or crash due to the volumetric impropriety of interest anyhow.

So what is a “Bank Bill Swap Rate” (BBSR)?

Simply putting it its the rate of interest on what we are led to believe is inter-bank lending, which is of course a process that launders stolen money, formerly stolen in all private debt to subsequently reflate any given nations circulation as irreversible multiplications of falsified debt.

Often when you hear other nations purchasing your nations national debt it means the banks in those other nations are stealing money from the people in that other nation via their private debt to perpetually reflate your nations circulation via your national debt & visa versa.

As a result a portion of your taxation is paid to the banks in those other nations & visa versa, only to service but never pay down any given nations falsified debt. Concluding all banking or the practice of purported banking in itself is an inherent international money laundering racket, even your little ole bank down the corner plays its part robbing you with a smile.

Of course some of you might question if BBSR is referring to the inter-banking interest rates how can we be paying the banks interest?

Well, Its all quite simple really because we are all servicing or paying the banks inter-banking debts via our own personal falsified debts, which are purported loans that do not ethically or rationally even transpire in the first place, simply because the banks (all banks including central banks) are neither risking or giving up commensurable consideration of value themselves.

Furthermore we can deduce now the difference in interest rates we pay any peripheral bank in all private debt which is at a higher rate of interest — comparative to what banks pay each other in interest or ultimately to a central bank which is at a lower rate of interest — is the peripheral banks unearned gain or unjust reward for stealing & laundering the principal & the remainder of interest out of circulation & into the possession of central banks (after the peripheral bank takes its cut out of the interest you pay them), only to have political betrayers play their part in laundering this already stolen money (principal & interest) back into circulation, again & again, over & over as ever greater escalations of falsified debt in government expenditure, which is of course mathematically impossible to pay down due to the volumetric impropriety of interest (perpetual deflation) we all formerly pay out of a forever deficient circulation in artificial price inflation in our private falsified debts, that subsequently steals all that much further from us just spending money today.

This tells anyone of sound mind banks have no reserves, not even a central bank has reserves, not even deposits in the bank are the banks reserves when the principal & the remainder of the interest is entirely dedicated to perpetually reflate any given nations circulation.

To even remotely suggest banks are spending or paying what they formerly steal back into circulation is ignoring the cycles of perpetual reflation by every increase in government debt, which we have already proven is the sum of principal & interest the people formerly pay out of circulation in private debt.

If anything what banks spend & or pay in interest on bank deposits amounts to a mere fraction of 1% out of the principal & interest they formerly steal in private debt, where logic tells anyone of sound mind the remaining 99.99% in principal & interest is perpetually laundered out of circulation just servicing our private falsified debts, which is perpetually, then, laundered  back into circulation again as every increase in government debt.

The pseudoscience of today’s false economy is telling everyone the higher the interest rate the less people purport to borrow or spend on a whole, & the lower the interest rate the more people purport to borrow or spend on a whole.

This of course is a false assumption once it dawns on the individual — that any sum of interest we pay out of circulation in all private debt is neither created or issued into circulation above the sum of principal — which sets off these terminal cycles of perpetual deflation & reflation, irreversibly multiplying the overall sum of falsified debt on each & every subsequent cycle of reflation as every new sum of debt, which can only at best service the former sum of falsified debt but never ever pay down any new sum of debt — stealing all that much further from each & everyone of us by however much, or any rate of interest you pay above the sum of principal when we simply spend money.

What this simply means — regardless of the rate of interest — we have to collectively borrow (allegedly borrow) more & more, thus spending more & more just to service the old debt but never the new.

Pure observation & logic alone tells us the reduction of interest rates after a former increase does not reduce the overall price of goods & services already inflated by interest, so its utter folly to ever suggest reducing the rate of interest reduces the overall cost or price of anything when any rate of interest  that  inflates prices is compound regardless, much less does reducing interest rates reduce the overall spending to service the ever greater escalations of falsified debt caused by interest. This in effect refutes the mere unsubstantiated assumption that suggests different rates of interest  determines why people borrow more or less, when the determining factor is instead any rate of interest requires us to borrow (allegedly) even more regardless.

Of course under the present but final terminal cycles of reflation — irreversibly multiplied by interest — most of us can no longer afford higher rates of interest, so interest rates are kept low to temporally sustain purported borrowing for a brief period of time, only as a means to artificially sustain today’s lie of economy for that brief period of time, which can only at best prolong or temper ultimate monetary destruction that little bit longer.

Logically we can further determine higher rates of interest, such as double digits seen in the 80’s can only bring about monetary destruction all that much faster. This is exactly why you will see no substantial increase in interest rates between now & the coming second greater depression, simply due to the sheer enormity of today’s falsified indebtedness irreversibly multiplied by any rate of interest.

In all seriousness you would have to have a brain the size of a pea to ever believe inflation (circulatory), much less growth is even remotely possible so long as we are all paying principal & interest out of a volume of circulation only ever comprised of some remaining principal. The primary school mathematics & rudimentary logic of a kindergarten child essentially tells anyone of sound mind all present & future production, which even includes any increase in our production, whether its any increase in sales, salaries, taxation or phony loans is entirely dedicated to service, but never ever pay down an ever greater escalation of falsified debt, due to any rate of interest purportedly owed to these thieving banks.

“The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous we cannot believe it exists.”
~J. Edgar Hoover

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 02, 2017, last edit July 27, 2017)

 

FOI request to the Bank of England

01 Saturday Jul 2017

Posted by in FOI request to the Bank of England

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This is the Freedom Of Information request we put to the Bank of England back in 2011 at asking 4 simple questions

1) What lawful consideration do you claim the BoE gives up when it creates money ?
2) How then does the bank (or does the bank) claim there is a debt to the bank ?
3) What is the claim to interest then, when the bank can do no more than absorb the costs of merely publishing evidence of our promissory obligations *to each other* ?
4) How is it possible even to maintain a vital circulation without accumulating inevitably terminal sums of debt ?

Note: The end result was of course as usual “EVASION”.

You can put these questions to any bank, even peripheral banks . Try it & you will basically get the same response . They will evade answering these questions particularly the first knowing all too well if they do it will be self incriminating or admitting to theft.

Think about it — If they’re not stealing in the form of pretend loans they would simply answer the damn questions wouldn’t they? but their pathetic excuse for not answering them is that these questions are unintelligible. In the end the BoE claimed the expense they would have to forgo finding the answers to these simple questions would be too costly for them. Too costly for them alright because if they answered the questions it would end their crime of theft & they damn well know it.

All they have to do is answer the first question really, because if they can prove they give up consideration of commensurable value in the creation or any loan of money the following questions are made redundant, except question 4 of course, simply due the current escalations of debt, which they then have to explain how & why is not terminal, which we already know they cant answer, because no one on this planet can prove or demonstrate how the sum of interest is created & issued into circulation above the sum of principal that takes us back to question 1 again. In retrospect questions 2, 3 & 4 take you back to question 1, which is why its the first question, that’s hardly unintelligible.

Its really a YES or NO answer to the first question. Do you give up consideration of value in the creation of money? . Is your answer YES or NO?. If your answer is YES what consideration are you then giving up in the creation of money ? but they refuse to even do that. Unintelligible my arse — The question couldn’t be any more simpler.

We are only asking the bank the same question we would otherwise ask ourselves to identify who exactly is creating money, determining then if any loan transpires or not. So If anyone of us was asked if we give up consideration of value in the creation of money the answer would be logically YES, & if asked what consideration are we giving up — pure observation alone tells anyone with a half a brain that we are giving up our labour & production that has the only lawful consideration of commensurable value.

So if it is we who create all new money, which we have already proven to be the case for nearly 50 years already, predominately by the purchaser who issues a promissory obligation/note before publication, before any subsequent deposit — so how is it even ethically or rationally possible for the “obligor” (creator of money) to borrow what has not yet been paid & or deposited from the resulting sale?

The simple answer its not possible. To suggest we loan or borrow money from each other defies all logic & reason — putting the cart before the horse. Indicating further we are not even loaning or borrowing money from each other either, much less from a thieving bank. When the unadulterated debt is merely an obligation by the *obligor* to “pay & retire” the principal, free from exploitation or unjust intervention.

Make no mistake MPE is NOT claiming there is no debt,  simply because the only debt that transpires is the true debt we have  to each other. Therefore the argument is not to somehow get out of paying the debt altogether, but instead the intent to restore today’s falsified debts (phony loans) to their original unadulterated state where there never is any loan or borrowing.

For detailed correspondence regarding this FOI request please visit WhatDoTheyKnow. OR HERE.

Please note “whatdotheyknow” have since taken down the detailed correspondence which can only be perceived as further EVASION of the facts.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

 

(Published : July 01, 2017, last edit January 19, 2019)

 

Buffoonery of Pretended Economists

01 Saturday Jul 2017

Posted by in Buffoonery of Pretended Economists, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The purported economist (Richard Werner) in the video below is contradicting himself every which way to justify the lie banks create & loan money, & in all insanity this buffoon is suggesting this money is created out of nothing or thin air, which could not be any further from the truth.

Its all quite simple if you stick to the verifiable facts without contradicting or compromising those facts.

Lets be very clear banks do not create money, NOT EVER, not just because banks or mere publishers give up no consideration of commensurable value but because we the people are creating this money all along instead by giving up the only consideration of commensurable value, so what can those of us who are sound mind logically conclude from this simple observation of verifiable fact?

1) Banks are logically not creating money because the bank is neither risking or giving the consideration of value you give up, which is hardly thin air, nothing or fictitious.

2) Banks are logically not loaning you *YOUR* money because the bank neither risks or gives up consideration of value from its otherwise prior legitimate possession to even rationally justify any loan from the bank to you, much less the taking of interest.

3) Banks are logically not purchasing or borrowing your promissory note / security / money because the bank neither risks or gives up consideration of value to otherwise rationally justify any purchase between you & the bank took place, much less any loan from you to the bank.

4) Banks are logically stealing the value of our production we give up to each other in any trade or transaction , ”X2″ due to unwarranted interest by simply pretending to loan all the money WE CREATE (principal only) into circulation in the first place. In other words the purported loan is not a loan at all, neither ethically or rationally, but instead a monumental crime of theft.

5) Logically economist Richard Werner & associates (phony experts in economy) & usury media alike are throwing the baby out with the bathwater to irrationally justify an oxymoron (ie: banks create money out of nothing) & a myriad of other barefaced LIES thereafter as a result.

Do not be fooled by these 11th hour pretenders folks. To irrationally suggest banks create money from nothing is to likewise suggest banks are stealing nothing, which is denying a monumental crime of theft.

So no matter how these buffoons obscure the facts the purported loan never transpires anyway, not from the bank to one of us, nor from one of us to the bank. No legitimate sale ever transpires between the bank or anyone because the business of banking is not commerce but piracy. Whichever way you look at this however distorted by pretend economists the bank gives up no commensurable consideration of value from its otherwise prior legitimate possession in any debt, trade, sale or transaction. Therefore the purported loan is a monumental crime of theft, subsequently stealing the value WE THE PEOPLE give to all money & property that is hardly nothing or thin air.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 01, 2017, last edit July 27, 2017)

Pretended experts in economy

01 Saturday Jul 2017

Posted by in Pretended experts in economy

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Some time ago I had a fellow with a doctorate in economics question why I use the word “volume”. He proceeded to then hold some authority over me because according to him today’s economics does not use volumes & because I do not have a degree like him in today’s lie of economy I have no authority on the subject, evidently because I’m using volumes apparently.

My reply was quite simple when I proceeded to ask him if today’s economics uses percentages to demonstrate rates of profit, margins of solubility or purported growth how is this not a measurement in respect to volume?

For example if you have a 25%  profit is this not telling you that 25% exceeds the volume of 100%  invested?

So if you invest $80 & get back $100 is this not a 25% gain or alternatively a $20 gain in proportion to the initial $80 investment. Therefore $80 is your 100% volume or overall outlay & $20 is your 25% gain.

Eg:  $80 = 100% ÷ 4 = $20 = 25% 

In short the percentage (%) is a scale used to measure something as a fraction comparative to associated volume.

So If you want to take down any phony economist in one question just ask them what is a volume of circulation that is neither above or below its intended representation? or in broad obscure terms otherwise taught in universities that might make some sense to these buffoons; What is a volume of circulation that is neither above or below the cost of goods & services (ie:representation).

Without giving away the answer here its simply a question of logic that extends the mathematics from one point to another.

Hint: if “C” is neither above “I” or below “D” what is “C” in proportion to “V”?

Of course its a Circulation always [_____] in Volume , or alternatively a circulation always [______] in Value in proportion to the Volume of Circulation relating to the dispositional impropriety of Inflation & Deflation in respect to represented property, which gives you the same answer of logic anyhow.

Those of you who cant immediately answer this question I suggest you read the home page or seek the answer in the menu.

I’m nonetheless still waiting for this pretended expert’s answer, which is an answer so simple it equates to the rudimentary logic of a kindergarten child putting a square peg through a square hole.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 01, 2017, last edit July 09, 2017)