Tag Archives: G. Edward Griffin

What is debt free money.

29 Thursday Oct 2020

Posted by in Uncategorized, What is debt free money

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Debt free money is a rational impossibility simply because all money pays a debt.

(Debt free money = Oxymoron).

Loan free money however is rationally possible because the true creator of all new money is always the debtor, predominately the obligor who is a debtor nonetheless.

(Loan free money = Interest free money).

” Contrary to the common misconception that otherwise suggests banks create & or loan money they in fact don’t, never have, or ever will, simply because they have no proof of claim . To be very clear not one bank on the face of this planet can prove or even demonstrate what consideration of commensurable value they would either risk or give up from their otherwise prior legitimate possession.”

Often people will equate “debt free money” to “interest free money” which is false, omitting the evidential fact there never was or ever is any loan. They do this simply because they irrationally believe the solution is where the government can legitimately create & or legitimately loan the principal free from the imposition of interest — without taking into deliberation the government, much like all private banks are NOT the debtor (obligor), nor the true creditor (someone that is legitimately giving up property to the debtor in exchange for money) who are giving up commensurable value to each other from their otherwise prior legitimate possession.

Make no mistake. Under the ruse of banking (public or private) that pretends to create & loan money  “governments” are neither legitimate buyers (debtors) nor legitimate sellers (creditors), nor are they legitimate lenders if they give up no consideration of value from their otherwise prior legitimate possession.

Of course in a world without thieving banks or unjust intervention (public or private) the debtor simply “pays & retires” the principal without the imposition of unwarranted interest.

In other words under MPE nothing comes for free. It is the debtor who always pays the true creditor in full for whatever regardless, & only then it’s the “debtor’s obligation” that initially creates the principal (new money) to go out & earn that principal to therefore redeem that principal, so it can be rightfully retired or deleted from the monetary system.

The result is NO deflation, NO reflation, nor any inflation if the principal is rightfully retired equal to depreciation or consumption of the related property (see the mathematics).

Please note: One could argue “circulatory deflation” occurs under MPE when the principal is retired & “circulatory inflation/reflation”  likewise occurs when new money is created upon new represented property, however it’s important to understand so long as we are retiring the principal at the rate of depreciation or consumption of the related property these fluctuations are irrelevant comparative to the terminal cycles of deflation & reflation caused by interest today.

Within this whole process the only “True Debt” we have to each other always remains so long as we are “giving” up our production to each other, simply trading that production, & or as a matter of money being further spent within the monetary circulation until such time that principal is rightfully retired by the debtor (obligor), however it’s important to note here there are NO loans, NO borrowing, NO paying back anyone.

(Loan free money = Interest free money).

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : Oct 29, 2020, Edit:Jan27,2021)

Comment etiquette please

 

TRADING EQUAL PRODUCTION

09 Friday Mar 2018

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

There are some people out there who still irrationally assume because we are trading equal production in a Mathematically Perfected Economy there is no profit taking.

To be very clear producers can in fact take profits in a Mathematically Perfected Economy & still trade equal representations of wealth. I must stress however the key to understanding this is first identifying the difference between “Earned Profit” & “Unearned Profit”.

Earned Profit is what value we give up to each other in our production.

Unearned Profit is the taking of interest on purported loans that don’t ethically or rationally transpire in the first place which is logically a theft of production — considering the true debt is nothing more than an obligation to “pay & retire” the principal.

For example if it cost you $10 to produce a product in MPE & you sell that product for $15 you are taking a $5 profit.

Logically that $5 represents your personal production above the $10 production likewise given up by you & or subsequently to you in your initial purchase costs, so the purchaser buying from you is logically giving up $15 in their own production to purchase your product. Logically the purchaser buying from you is giving up $15 of their production equal to the total production value of $15 given up by you the seller.

In fact running any business under MPE can still profit (earned profit) without passing the added cost of interest (unearned profit) in artificial price inflation onto you the consumer in the resulting price of goods & services.

By eradicating the crime of banking & the added cost of interest altogether – logically it will considerably reduce the overall price or cost of goods & services almost immediately — without affecting the profit margins of current producers.

Make no mistake under the ruse of banking all producers are taking unequal representations of wealth from each other due to the added cost or imposition of unwarranted interest. Logically any rate of interest over time is artificially compounding the overall cost or price of our production eternally skywards. All of which at the end of the day is purportedly owed to thieving banks that neither risk nor give up consideration of commensurable value from their otherwise prior legitimate possession. Not in the banks purported creation of OUR money? Neither in any purported loan, nor for that matter do they risk or give up consideration of value in any sale, trade or transaction of our production.

Most if not all people today are completely oblivious to the fact it is they the people (predominately the purchaser or obligor) who are the only fiduciary issuers & creators of all new money — for it is they the people together (buyer & seller) giving up their production to each other are giving up the only commensurable consideration of value.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

 

(Published : March 09, 2018, last edit March 09, 2018)

True Debt vs Falsified Debt

19 Friday Jan 2018

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Due to the banking purposed obfuscation or misrepresentation of all money & property many people irrationally assume the debt is a crime against humanity, however, this is throwing the baby out with the bathwater by failing to see the underpinning debt (true debt) we have to each other commits no crime against anyone.

It is important to understand that unexploited debt is nothing more than an act of GIVING to each other, that money simply records, evidences &  likewise represents. The very act of trading our production to each other in any sale, trade or transaction is the only debt that truly ever transpires.

Today’s falsified debt, however, is when a bank purports to lend you money. This is the exploited debt — where a purported lender pretends to loan you the sum of principal, neither risking nor giving up commensurable consideration of value from their otherwise prior legitimate possession. Not in their purported creation of money. Not in any purported loan. Not even in any true debt, sale, trade or transaction.

What the alternative media today has to comprehend is there never is any loan or borrowing in the only true debt we have to each other, which is nothing more than an obligation to pay the principal. redeem the principal  & rightfully retire the principal until such time the debt is fulfilled.

The fact purported banks are pretending to loan all new money into circulation indicates today’s debts are falsified debts. The falsified debt is when the purported lender falsifies the debt payable to themselves, which is stealing the value of the true debts the people have to each other.

Of course, this is not to throw the baby out with the bathwater again by irrationally assuming money has no representation of value because banks are neither risking nor giving up consideration either.

What people have to likewise understand is we the people are the only true fiduciary issuers & creators of new money (principal only). We always have been creating money in all private debt, simply because it is we the people who can prove & demonstrate it is we who give up the only consideration of commensurable value in any or all debt. Whether it is in any sale, trade or transaction this verifiable fact alone evidences the true debts we have to each other, regardless of the banks purposed misrepresentation of our promissory obligations that of course falsifies the true debts we have to each other — instead payable — to a thieving bank in a purported loan that neither ethically nor even rationally transpire in the first place.

I always ask myself why on earth are so many people demonizing the debt & or money itself instead of the phony loan that in truth never transpires. The only rational conclusion I can come up with is these people are blinded by greed to a point they refuse to accept the ONE TRUTH that will set them free.

David Ardron.
Advocate/mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published: January 19, 2018, last edit January 19, 2018)

Surplus vs Deficit

08 Wednesday Nov 2017

Posted by in Surplus vs Deficit

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

To comprehend the basic concept of any Surplus or Deficit  is to firstly be aware the overall sum of falsified debt under the ruse of banking is rising in either instance.

To likewise comprehend any surplus attained by government is to be aware the surplus is temporarily balancing government debt at any given point in time, but never ever paying it down primarily due to the volumetric impropriety of interest imposed on all private debt — that sets off these terminal cycles of perpetual deflation & subsequent cycles of perpetual reflation that increases the overall sum of falsified debt.

SURPLUS: Is when the government has attained an excess of public revenue via taxation, sales of public land / infrastructure etc that is equal & or above the necessary payments servicing government debt. In other words the surplus is a sum of money that is left over only after political betrayers have balanced government debt, otherwise referred to in the political arena as balancing the budget, contrary to the suggestive lie pushed by usury media that otherwise assumes any surplus means the government has paid off government debt.

DEFICIT: Is when the government has simply not attained enough public revenue to balance government debt. What this simply means the government is not meeting their obligation servicing the former sum of government debt, much less ever paying down any new sum of debt due to the added cost of interest.

CONCLUSION
Therefore regardless of any surplus or deficit the government budget is taking even more from one or many sectors of today’s lie of economy & taking less from another, & or giving more to one sector & taking even more from another to cover the shortfall.

For example increasing social security payments at a greater cost in taxation that nonetheless exceeds the increasing cost of social security payments,  that can only at best keep on servicing the ever greater escalations of government debt without actually paying it down.

Other means & ways of saving public expenditure to balance any budget is by simply spending less on public infrastructure such as education, roads, public transport, hospitals etc & just increasing the overall costs of existing public services. Another might be increasing fuel taxes & giving pensioner discounts on various public services. In any case the government is always, always, always taking more & more from the people above the added cost of interest.

Of course with the assistance of usury media political betrayers will always sell the benefit to the people as a good thing, but will never disclose ultimately at what cost — which is taking even more public revenue from somewhere else that is always greater than the benefit itself provided in the budget.

A perfect example is election bribes seen in past governments here that just gave every Australian citizen earning less than 100K a year a one off payment of $900 in a purported stimulus package, & while everyone was rubbing their hands together the government is just quietly taking considerably more from the individual in increased motor vehicle registration fees, license renewals, rates, levies, taxes etc. With the added cost of interest artificially inflating prices all along the one off payment of $900 was hardly any consolation for the Aussie battler trying to make their mortgage payments, while the overall cost of living & housing was & still is going through the roof.

So not only is the added cost of interest artificially inflating prices the government is taking even more from us in increasing public revenue to service the greater escalations of government debt — that is caused by the unwarranted imposition of interest we pay out of circulation in private debt in the first place.

Any or all budgets under the ruse of banking amounts to nothing more than a dog & pony show, where the main event in is a dog chasing its tail. Politicians are basically cutting their nose off to spite their face in any or all budgets.

In truth any government surplus solves absolutely nothing under the ruse of banking, simply because it is only temporarily balancing the budget at an even greater cost to the nation on a whole.

It is what it is. So long as we’re all paying any rate of interest on our personal falsified debts, & or paying the added cost of interest just spending money today servicing someone else’s purported loan the budget is subsequently blown upon further cycles of deflation & reflation regardless.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : November 08, 2017, last edit November 08, 2017)

Supply & Demand

20 Friday Oct 2017

Posted by in supply & demand, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Ultimately the driving force behind price inflation is the added cost of interest, which is nonetheless compounding the cost or price of everything eternally skywards way beyond any otherwise price fluctuation possibly caused by supply & demand

It is said low supply & high demand increases the price of homes, however this is obscure & somewhat theoretical considering the added cost of interest artificially inflates housing prices regardless of any purported loan approvals or any new homes being built.

In retrospect if we eradicated banking/interest it should stand to reason if there is low supply & high demand of not only homes but any particular product you should be paying less than what you would otherwise pay today. On the other side of the coin if there was high supply & low demand you should be paying even less again for that product than what you would otherwise pay today.

What this simply means regardless of supply & demand you will be paying much less if we just eradicated the crime of banking/interest altogether (see One Solution).

Logically industry & commerce will be still making the same profits (earned profit), however the only difference is they wont be passing the added cost of interest (unearned profit) onto YOU the consumer.

If the theory of supply & demand stands correct as a determining factor in price after only after banking/interest is eradicated — I would personally define price fluctuations poosibly caused supply & demand *natural price inflation & deflation* often restricted to the particular product question & for so long as the supply of that product remains overabundant or scarce in relation to demand.

Under a Mathematically Perfected Economy™ in a true free enterprise market, free from the current artificial manipulation of the cost or value of all money & property  — if a product supply actually meets demand we might further determine the price of that product is neither subject to inflation or deflation whatsoever.

Of course what is not a theory but an irrefutable fact already is any increase in price caused by unwarranted interest imposed on any or all production is  *artificial price inflation*, that steals all that much further from us when we just spend money today, considering the principal is not even loaned to us in private debt when its first introduced into circulation upon the sale (see One Problem).

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : October 20, 2017, last edit Jan 23, 2019)

 

Is a moneyless society a solution?

02 Monday Oct 2017

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

To begin it’s important for the readers to comprehend since the very conception of money dating back as far as 2000BC — money has always been a record of entitlement to another’s production. In other words money in its simplest terms is “accounting” that records, evidences & represents the value of our labour & production we ordinarily give up to each other in any exchange or sale of goods & services.

Therefore by throwing the baby (money) out with the bath water (banking) is actually throwing away the accounting altogether, which is basically removing the very thing that can evidence if we are giving up equal representations of wealth to each other from the overall pool of wealth, but likewise throwing away what can otherwise prove if someone is taking more from the overall pool of wealth than what they themselves are actually contributing or giving back to that overall pool of wealth.

In short if wasn’t for money we couldn’t identity a thief, much less even prove they’re a thief such as today’s banking system who give up no consideration of value. The only reason why banks are getting away with a monumental crime of  theft is because most if not all people dont even know what money is, how its really created & what it truly represents.

Logically so long as there is just one man or women possessed by greed on this planet a moneyless society opens up the door for further exploitation, or theft of another’s production. Make no mistake only if or when mankind ever becomes perfect in every which way, bereft of all greed or desire is the day mankind might consider a moneyless system of exchange & not before. Until that day comes money is our only protection.

Sadly the proponents of a moneyless society fail to conclude it is not the money itself or debt that commits the crime against us, but purported banks that are not even banks by any definition of the word “bank” found in the dictionary.

Instead of identifying the thief (ie:bank) who is foreign to the contract or exchange of our production that subsequently steals the value of our production in a purported loan — the advocates of purported solutions such as “Zeitgeist” or “Ubuntu” are irrationally declaring all money & all debt is the problem, when the fact remains all money regardless of any misrepresentation of the debt or money itself still records, evidences & represents the value of our labour & production we GIVE UP TO EACH OTHER other in any sale, trade or transaction — where there never was or ever is any loan or borrowing.

The hidden truth that the proponents of moneyless trade are not telling you is banks or mere publishers of money do not ever create or loan us money. If they ever did they would already know what money is, how its really created & what it truly represents, which will in turn expose the flaw in their purported solution, leaving the door wide open for further exploitation, where thieves & criminals could run a muck knowing there is no method of accounting whatsoever that can otherwise prove their guilt.

Its bad enough having a method of accounting today that falsifies a debt to a thief who gives up squat — that I might add no one wants to ever address, but quite frankly throwing out the accounting (money) altogether is just asking to be robbed.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)


(Published : October 02, 2017, last edit October 02, 2017)

 

 

Is Australia Bankrupt?

04 Monday Sep 2017

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

You don’t have to be Albert Einstein to figure out every nation on the face of this planet is already bankrupt.

Its no secret bankruptcy is mathematically guaranteed — so long as we are all paying *principal + interest* out of a monetary circulation comprised of only some remaining *principal* at most.

Do the primary school mathematics yourselves folks. Its only a matter adding & subtracting, but these morons in finance, politics & usury media alike today cant even do that, which is clearly evident when they insistently blame one of the many symptoms as the cause of financial hardship instead.

Example : Principal = 10, Interest = 5.

10 − (10 + 5) = −5.

NOTE: The result is a negative 5, NOT a positive 5.

Anyone with half a brain should know if your sum debit (−) is greater than your sum credit (+) you are effectively BROKE.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : September 04, 2017, last edit September 04, 2017)

 

The Ancient Ruse

16 Sunday Jul 2017

Posted by in The Ancient Ruse, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Before we begin it is important to note the ancient ruse of the money changer dating back to 33AD was morphed into a pretend loan by today’s purported banking in 1150AD.

The money changers in 33AD were essentially exchanging 1 talent in one denominated currency for 2 talents of another denominated currency, both of which talents where nearly the same weight or measure by a matter of grams back then.

To actually purchase in the market an individual would first have to give a money changer 2 talents in coin & in return receive 1 talent in another coin, so one can at least trade in the market with that specific talent of coin (eg: bank money).

Basically the money changers were robbing an individual of 1 talent for risking nothing of their own by simply exchanging 1 for 2 — taking 100% unearned profit. This unjust intervention in all markets today is of course the banks first crime of theft — stealing a sum of principal.

Since 1150AD the ancient ruse of the money changer that steals 100% in principal has been disguised as a loan, which is in truth a purported loan that neither ethically or rationally transpires in the first place, only as a means to purposely hide an age old  theft that was otherwise so blatantly obvious.

Logically if an individual paid a money changer any more than 2 talents for only receiving 1 talent its therefore paying interest to a money changer for reasons I will explain in the following paragraphs.

Of course we can determine the only difference to ancient money changers exchanging 1 for 2  is  modern day money changers are exchanging 1 for 1 by merely publishing further representations of the money we create. In truth banks are only pretending to exchange 1 for 1, simply because there is only 1 talent of commensurable value representing what value you give up by promising your immediate & or future production before publication — before any sale or subsequent deposit — where its clearly evident the bank is only ever pretending to risk or give up 1 talent in value from the banks otherwise prior legitimate possession.

In essence the banks sleight of hand is basically handing the principal value you just created back to you in a pretend loan so you can trade in the market, & only then as a consequence thereafter charge you a further sum of principal in unwarranted interest for the privilege of being robbed of 1 talent in the first place.

We can likewise further determine the unjust  imposition of unwarranted interest is therefore the banks second crime of theft — resulting from the first crime of theft — stealing 2 talents in total or 2X the principal  for neither risking or giving up anything of value.

Considering the ancient money changers got away with stealing 100% for so long it only stands to reason why today’s modern day money changers, or what are commonly referred to as banks are getting away with stealing 200% plus — when you are all duped into actually believing the bank loans you money in the first place.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 16, 2017, last edit August 15, 2017)

The GDP Paradox

07 Friday Jul 2017

Posted by in The GDP Paradox, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is said to be a estimate of a nations economic growth. How a country’s GDP is calculated is using the following formula:

GDP = C + G + I + NX.

“C” is equal to all private Consumption, or Consumer spending in a nation’s economy, “G” is the sum of Government spending,  “I” is the sum of all the country’s investment, including businesses capital expenditures & “NX” is the Nation’s total net exports, calculated as total exports minus total imports (NX = Exports – Imports).

Where this formula gets it totally wrong is it just assumes private consumption (C) is equal to consumer spending & the total business Investment (I) is an addition, which is failing to account for the sum of principal + interest payed out of a forever deficient volume of  circulation only ever comprised of some remaining principal.

As a result this is likewise failing to conclude that most if not all government expenditure (G) is not investing taxation into any nation, but instead perpetually reintroducing or laundering the principal & interest formerly stolen out of circulation in all private debt back into circulation again as an ever greater escalation of government debt. This is in fact what funds government expenditure, apposed to taxation that is likewise paid out of circulation — either directly or indirectly into the banks coffers to service the ever greater escalations of government debt.

Although GDP accounts for imports & exports (NX) this only accounts for just one variable of reflation & deflation under banking.

Therefore what makes GDP an insane contradictory paradox is firstly it is adding the sum of deflation instead of subtracting it which irrationally estimates growth based upon non-existent inflation, & secondly even if we did have inflation you can not just assume any existence of inflation is a true indicator of growth either.

“Real growth, however, can only be determined when any increase in circulation is always equal to remaining debt & always equal to represented property value, where there quite literally is no inflation or deflation.”

So too is Debt-to-GDP misleading not only because the GDP aggregate itself is failing to subtract what it is always adding, but the debt is only referencing government debt apposed to all debt including private debt. It is assumed a low Debt-to-GDP ratio indicates a country is producing enough to service its debt without incurring further debt, which is mathematically impossible regardless so long as we are all paying the added cost of interest in private debt. This is in effect what artificially inflates prices by however much interest we pay out of circulation above the sum of principal just spending money today, that is at any given point in time deflationary (circulatory deflation) in regards to the remaining volume of circulation always available to industry & commerce.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 07, 2017, last edit Nov 11, 2017)

 

The cost of a home under the ruse of banking

05 Wednesday Jul 2017

Posted by in The cost of a home under the ruse of banking, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This home more than likely cost around 20K when it was built brand new sometime in the 1960s.

Contrary to what we are irrationally led to believe that suggest homes can only ever go up in value – homes are in fact depreciating in value. Logic tells anyone a home will fall down in 100 years if left neglected.

Furthermore due to the added cost of interest a home is artificially inflated in price by however much interest you pay above the sum of principal, which is in effect devaluing the home far beyond its otherwise remaining consumption or deprecation value by simply a theft of value, because banks who purport to loan all new money into circulation in the first place neither risk or give up consideration of commensurable value from the banks otherwise prior legitimate possession, making the purported loan a monumental crime of theft &  the unwarranted imposition of interest a further crime of theft yet again, which is artificially sustained by further falsified debts that perpetually reflates a forever deficient circulation with irreversible sums of falsified indebtedness.

In this example you are paying the value of 37.5 homes to a thieving bank for only receiving one home with a true value of 20K minus consumption, & if you purportedly borrowed the 750K to purchase this home today you are basically paying another 37.5 homes again to a thieving bank in unwarranted interest tomorrow. Totaling 75 homes (750%) or 1.5 million for a home worth less than 20K ($20,000 X 75 = 1.5 million).

Essentially the true value of this home has depreciated 750% below or beyond  its otherwise remaining consumption value due to banks robbing everyone blind when they purchase homes, because any price inflation caused by the added cost of  interest — irreversibly multiplied by however much interest you pay out of circulation above the sum of principal — can only ever be stealing all that much further from us when we just spend money today.

Of course this artificial increase in price caused by the added cost of interest is giving most if not all people the illusion of increasing value when its instead the complete polar opposite due to a monumental crime of theft of that value (eg: $20,000 X 75) — that can only be irreversibly multiplied by unwarranted interest yet again — stealing all that much further from us again & again & again.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 04, 2017, last edit July 09, 2017)