• HOME (click header above)
  • ONE PROBLEM (NEW)
  • ONE TRUTH (NEW)
  • ONE SOLUTION (NEW)
  • MIKES MODEL
  • THE MATHEMATICS
  • 2013 MANDATE
  • GLOSSARY OF TERMS
  • POD CASTS
  • AUSTRALIAN DEBT CLOCK
  • DICTIONARY
  • (Android & iOS)

Australia for Mathematically Perfected Economy™

Australia for Mathematically Perfected Economy™

Tag Archives: Dennis Kucinich

Is Australia Bankrupt?

04 Monday Sep 2017

Posted by australia4mpe in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

911, Australian banks, Bankrupt, banks, Bill Still, central bank, coins, Constitution, contract, contractual obligation, Corruption, credit, criminals, debt, deflation, Dennis Kucinich, freedom, G. Edward Griffin, gold, immigration, inflation, interest, mandate, math’s, mathematically perfected economy, money, politics, promissory note, recession, Rothschild, silver, solution, sovereignty, tax, Terrorism, the great depression, The Secret of Oz, truth, usury, war

You don’t have to be Albert Einstein to figure out every nation on the face of this planet is already bankrupt.

Its no secret bankruptcy is mathematically guaranteed — so long as we are all paying *principal + interest* out of a monetary circulation comprised of only some remaining *principal* at most.

Do the primary school mathematics yourselves folks. Its only a matter adding & subtracting, but these morons in finance, politics & usury media alike today cant even do that, which is clearly evident when they insistently blame one of the many symptoms as the cause of financial hardship instead.

Example : Principal = 10, Interest = 5.

10 − (10 + 5) = −5.

NOTE: The result is a negative 5, NOT a positive 5.

Anyone with half a brain should know if your sum debit (−) is greater than your sum credit (+) you are effectively BROKE.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : September 04, 2017, last edit September 04, 2017)

 

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

The Ancient Ruse

16 Sunday Jul 2017

Posted by australia4mpe in The Ancient Ruse, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

911, Australian banks, bank of England, banks, central bank, coins, Constitution, contract, contractual obligation, credit, criminals, debt, deflation, Dennis Kucinich, freedom, G. Edward Griffin, gold, gold standard, illuminati, inflation, interest, math’s, mathematically perfected economy, money, plagiarist, promissory note, recession, Ron Paul, Rothschild, silver, solution, Stephen Zarlenga, tax, the great depression, The Secret of Oz, truth, usury, war

Before we begin it is important to note the ancient ruse of the money changer dating back to 33AD was morphed into a pretend loan by today’s purported banking in 1150AD.

The money changers in 33AD were essentially exchanging 1 talent in one denominated currency for 2 talents of another denominated currency, both of which talents where nearly the same weight or measure by a matter of grams back then.

To actually purchase in the market an individual would first have to give a money changer 2 talents in coin & in return receive 1 talent in another coin, so one can at least trade in the market with that specific talent of coin (eg: bank money).

Basically the money changers were robbing an individual of 1 talent for risking nothing of their own by simply exchanging 1 for 2 — taking 100% unearned profit. This unjust intervention in all markets today is of course the banks first crime of theft — stealing a sum of principal.

Since 1150AD the ancient ruse of the money changer that steals 100% in principal has been disguised as a loan, which is in truth a purported loan that neither ethically or rationally transpires in the first place, only as a means to purposely hide an age old  theft that was otherwise so blatantly obvious.

Logically if an individual paid a money changer any more than 2 talents for only receiving 1 talent its therefore paying interest to a money changer for reasons I will explain in the following paragraphs.

Of course we can determine the only difference to ancient money changers exchanging 1 for 2  is  modern day money changers are exchanging 1 for 1 by merely publishing further representations of the money we create. In truth banks are only pretending to exchange 1 for 1, simply because there is only 1 talent of commensurable value representing what value you give up by promising your immediate & or future production before publication — before any sale or subsequent deposit — where its clearly evident the bank is only ever pretending to risk or give up 1 talent in value from the banks otherwise prior legitimate possession.

In essence the banks sleight of hand is basically handing the principal value you just created back to you in a pretend loan so you can trade in the market, & only then as a consequence thereafter charge you a further sum of principal in unwarranted interest for the privilege of being robbed of 1 talent in the first place.

We can likewise further determine the unjust  imposition of unwarranted interest is therefore the banks second crime of theft — resulting from the first crime of theft — stealing 2 talents in total or 2X the principal  for neither risking or giving up anything of value.

Considering the ancient money changers got away with stealing 100% for so long it only stands to reason why today’s modern day money changers, or what are commonly referred to as banks are getting away with stealing 200% plus — when you are all duped into actually believing the bank loans you money in the first place.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 16, 2017, last edit August 15, 2017)

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

The GDP Paradox

07 Friday Jul 2017

Posted by australia4mpe in The GDP Paradox, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

911, bank of England, coins, contract, contractual obligation, credit, criminals, debt, deflation, Dennis Kucinich, freedom, G. Edward Griffin, GDP, gold standard, illuminati, inflation, interest, intrinsic, kevin rudd, liberty, mandate, math, math’s, mathematically perfected economy, money, plagiarist, promissory note, recession, Ron Paul, Rothschild, silver, sovereignty, Stephen Zarlenga, tax, the great depression, The Secret of Oz, truth, usury, war

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is said to be a estimate of a nations economic growth. How a country’s GDP is calculated is using the following formula:

GDP = C + G + I + NX.

“C” is equal to all private Consumption, or Consumer spending in a nation’s economy, “G” is the sum of Government spending,  “I” is the sum of all the country’s investment, including businesses capital expenditures & “NX” is the Nation’s total net exports, calculated as total exports minus total imports (NX = Exports – Imports).

Where this formula gets it totally wrong is it just assumes private consumption (C) is equal to consumer spending & the total business Investment (I) is an addition, which is failing to account for the sum of principal + interest payed out of a forever deficient volume of  circulation only ever comprised of some remaining principal.

As a result this is likewise failing to conclude that most if not all government expenditure (G) is not investing taxation into any nation, but instead perpetually reintroducing or laundering the principal & interest formerly stolen out of circulation in all private debt back into circulation again as an ever greater escalation of government debt. This is in fact what funds government expenditure, apposed to taxation that is likewise paid out of circulation — either directly or indirectly into the banks coffers to service the ever greater escalations of government debt.

Although GDP accounts for imports & exports (NX) this only accounts for just one variable of reflation & deflation under banking.

Therefore what makes GDP an insane contradictory paradox is firstly it is adding the sum of deflation instead of subtracting it which irrationally estimates growth based upon non-existent inflation, & secondly even if we did have inflation you can not just assume any existence of inflation is a true indicator of growth either.

“Real growth, however, can only be determined when any increase in circulation is always equal to remaining debt & always equal to represented property value, where there quite literally is no inflation or deflation.”

So too is Debt-to-GDP misleading not only because the GDP aggregate itself is failing to subtract what it is always adding, but the debt is only referencing government debt apposed to all debt including private debt. It is assumed a low Debt-to-GDP ratio indicates a country is producing enough to service its debt without incurring further debt, which is mathematically impossible regardless so long as we are all paying the added cost of interest in private debt. This is in effect what artificially inflates prices by however much interest we pay out of circulation above the sum of principal just spending money today, that is at any given point in time deflationary (circulatory deflation) in regards to the remaining volume of circulation always available to industry & commerce.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 07, 2017, last edit Nov 11, 2017)

 

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

The cost of a home under the ruse of banking

05 Wednesday Jul 2017

Posted by australia4mpe in The cost of a home under the ruse of banking, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

911, Australian banks, bank of England, banks, central bank, contractual obligation, credit, criminals, Dennis Kucinich, freedom, G. Edward Griffin, gold standard, housing bubble, illuminati, inflation, interest, liberty, math’s, mathematically perfected economy, money, plagiarist, promissory note, recession, Ron Paul, silver, solution, tax, the great depression, The Secret of Oz, truth, usury, war

This home more than likely cost around 20K when it was built brand new sometime in the 1960s.

Contrary to what we are irrationally led to believe that suggest homes can only ever go up in value – homes are in fact depreciating in value. Logic tells anyone a home will fall down in 100 years if left neglected.

Furthermore due to the added cost of interest a home is artificially inflated in price by however much interest you pay above the sum of principal, which is in effect devaluing the home far beyond its otherwise remaining consumption or deprecation value by simply a theft of value, because banks who purport to loan all new money into circulation in the first place neither risk or give up consideration of commensurable value from the banks otherwise prior legitimate possession, making the purported loan a monumental crime of theft &  the unwarranted imposition of interest a further crime of theft yet again, which is artificially sustained by further falsified debts that perpetually reflates a forever deficient circulation with irreversible sums of falsified indebtedness.

In this example you are paying the value of 37.5 homes to a thieving bank for only receiving one home with a true value of 20K minus consumption, & if you purportedly borrowed the 750K to purchase this home today you are basically paying another 37.5 homes again to a thieving bank in unwarranted interest tomorrow. Totaling 75 homes (750%) or 1.5 million for a home worth less than 20K ($20,000 X 75 = 1.5 million).

Essentially the true value of this home has depreciated 750% below or beyond  its otherwise remaining consumption value due to banks robbing everyone blind when they purchase homes, because any price inflation caused by the added cost of  interest — irreversibly multiplied by however much interest you pay out of circulation above the sum of principal — can only ever be stealing all that much further from us when we just spend money today.

Of course this artificial increase in price caused by the added cost of interest is giving most if not all people the illusion of increasing value when its instead the complete polar opposite due to a monumental crime of theft of that value (eg: $20,000 X 75) — that can only be irreversibly multiplied by unwarranted interest yet again — stealing all that much further from us again & again & again.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 04, 2017, last edit July 09, 2017)

 

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Is buying local beneficial to anyone under the ruse of banking

03 Monday Jul 2017

Posted by australia4mpe in Is buying local beneficial to anyone under the ruse of banking

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

911, Australian banks, bank of England, banks, buying local, central bank, coins, contractual obligation, credit, criminals, debt, deflation, Dennis Kucinich, freedom, G. Edward Griffin, Home grown, inflation, interest, intrinsic, mandate, math, math’s, mathematically perfected economy, money, plagiarist, recession, Ron Paul, Rothschild, silver, solution, sovereignty, tax, the great depression, The Secret of Oz, truth, usury, war

Regardlesslocal buisnessss where you spend money the value of our production we give up to each other, that all money records, evidences & represents is stolen by banks in  private debt, predominantly in the form of  purported loans that dont ethically or even rationally transpire in the first place, simply because banks neither risk or give up consideration of commensurable value from the banks otherwise prior legitimate possession.

If anyone wants further evidence of this monumental crime of theft  look no further than the added cost of interest passed onto the consumer in the resulting price of goods & services, which steals all that much further from each & everyone of us in artificial price inflation just spending money today, whether its purchasing from a small business, big business, foreign or local. Either way industry & commerce is passing the added cost of interest above the cost of principal inclusive onto you the consumer.

Logically earned Profit for any business is what you the consumer pays above the principal & interest purchasing whatever which is servicing someone else’s purported loan. Therefore you the consumer are subsequently paying principal + interest out of circulation spending money, plus the earned profit of course when the business purchases whatever with that earned profit, only to service someone else’s purported loan once again.

So regardless who you are or where you spend money, whether its expanding business, purchasing a third holiday home or just putting food on the table & buying clothes for your children — its ALWAYS YOU the consumer who is servicing that falsified debt to a thieving bank just spending money today.

Of course the small business proprietor who wrote that message on the blackboard above is blinded by greed & desire to a point he cant even see he is passing  the added cost of a monumental crime of theft onto his customers, making him no different to the CEO thats buying his third holiday home.

If anything the CEO is paying more out of circulation, but this does not change the fact that all small business is doing the exact same thing, only to have any or all profit stolen when its further spent into circulation.

So the question remains is buying local beneficial for anyone?

Well,,, if you have read & understood what I have already written above you would have to be a village idiot to believe buying local ever could under the ruse of banking.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 03, 2017, last edit July 09, 2017)

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Where is the banks proof of claim?

03 Monday Jul 2017

Posted by australia4mpe in Where is the banks proof of claim?

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

911, Australian banks, bank of England, banks, central bank, Constitution, contract, contractual obligation, credit, deflation, Dennis Kucinich, G. Edward Griffin, inflation, interest, mathematically perfected economy, money, plagiarist, promissory note, Proof, recession, solution, tax, the great depression, The Secret of Oz, truth, usury, war

Q: How can you simply identify those who want nothing more but to preserve the monumental crime of theft imposed by purported banking?

A: Well its quite simple really just identify all those who would have you actually believe banks create & or loan money in the first place, yet cant even prove or demonstrate what consideration of commensurable value banks or mere publishers (public or private) either risk or give up to otherwise justify the banks purported creation of OUR money, or any purported loan to one of us.

If these individuals cant provide PROOF OF CLAIM (ie:consideration of value) but just blindly insist banks create & or loan you money its quite clear these individuals want to preserve a monumental crime of theft, which is more often than less for their own personal gain at your expense — even when banks themselves cant or will not provide proof of claim for one blatantly obvious reason, because they dont give up consideration of value that would otherwise be proof of claim. Not even in a Freedom of Information request we put to the Bank of England back in 2011.

Generally you will find these individuals selling books, promoting their web sites & the web sites of others that dont even provide any rational proof of claim, but instead rife with mere unqualified assumptions, contradiction, half truths & barefaced lies. Some selling non-solution that can only divide & confuse people even further, but ensuring the theft continues for long as humanly possible until mankind finally succumbs to ultimate destruction. Not just by the hand of bankers & politicians, but all those who are knowingly selling you these lies that preserves this monumental crime of theft for their own personal gain, fame or glory of course, making all those propagating these lies & division no better than bankers & politicians.

MAKE NO MISTAKE : BANKS OR MERE PUBLISHERS WHO PRINT MONEY NEVER HAVE OR EVER WILL CREATE MONEY, BECAUSE WE THE PEOPLE DO. WE ALWAYS HAVE BY GIVING UP THE ONLY COMMENSURABLE CONSIDERATION OF VALUE BEFORE ANY DEPOSIT WHICH INCLUDES A PROMISSORY OBLIGATION THAT HAS LAWFUL CONSIDERATION OF COMMENSURABLE VALUE , BEFORE ANY BOOK ENTRY, BEFORE PUBLICATION OF MONEY,  WHICH LOGICALLY MEANS THERE NEVER WAS OR EVER IS ANY LOAN OR BORROWING OF MONEY. NOT FROM BANKS, NOT FROM MERE PUBLISHERS, NOT EVEN BETWEEN THE PEOPLE TO EACH OTHER, SIMPLY BECAUSE IT IS WE THE PEOPLE WHO CREATE MONEY — PERIOD.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)


(Published : July 03, 2017, last edit July 08, 2017)

 

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

How do banks launder money?

02 Sunday Jul 2017

Posted by australia4mpe in How banks launder money, Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

911, Australian banks, bank of England, banks, Bill Still, central bank, coins, Constitution, contract, contractual obligation, criminals, debt, Dennis Kucinich, G. Edward Griffin, gold, gold standard, illuminati, inflation, interest, intrinsic, kevin rudd, liberty, mandate, math, math’s, mathematically perfected economy, money, money laundering, plagiarist, promissory note, recession, Ron Paul, Rothschild, silver, solution, sovereignty, Stephen Zarlenga, tax, the great depression, The Secret of Oz, truth, usury, war

It’s quite simple really, because what peripheral banks (eg: ANZ Bank) steal from you in phony loans & every time you spend money today is laundered into the hands of a central bank via what we are led to believe is inter-bank lending, where the central banks subsequently use this stolen money to purchase treasury bonds not only in your nation, but in other nations abroad that perpetually reflates any given nations deficient circulation with already stolen money.

One could say the practice of banking is a monumental crime of theft & with the help of treasonous political betrayers its one big money laundering racket, essentially moving stolen money all over the world generally through central banks to reflate a nations circulation with irreversible multiplications of national debt.

Of course central banks are not the only purchasers of national debt. Peripheral banks, banking corporations such as insurance & investment companies also purchase treasury bonds, & a small percentage of pension funds also that banks pilfer anyway when markets periodically drop or crash due to the volumetric impropriety of interest anyhow.

So what is a “Bank Bill Swap Rate” (BBSR)?

Simply putting it its the rate of interest on what we are led to believe is inter-bank lending, which is of course a process that launders stolen money, formerly stolen in all private debt to subsequently reflate any given nations circulation as irreversible multiplications of falsified debt.

Often when you hear other nations purchasing your nations national debt it means the banks in those other nations are stealing money from the people in that other nation via their private debt to perpetually reflate your nations circulation via your national debt & visa versa.

As a result a portion of your taxation is paid to the banks in those other nations & visa versa, only to service but never pay down any given nations falsified debt. Concluding all banking or the practice of purported banking in itself is an inherent international money laundering racket, even your little ole bank down the corner plays its part robbing you with a smile.

Of course some of you might question if BBSR is referring to the inter-banking interest rates how can we be paying the banks interest?

Well, Its all quite simple really because we are all servicing or paying the banks inter-banking debts via our own personal falsified debts, which are purported loans that do not ethically or rationally even transpire in the first place, simply because the banks (all banks including central banks) are neither risking or giving up commensurable consideration of value themselves.

Furthermore we can deduce now the difference in interest rates we pay any peripheral bank in all private debt which is at a higher rate of interest — comparative to what banks pay each other in interest or ultimately to a central bank which is at a lower rate of interest — is the peripheral banks unearned gain or unjust reward for stealing & laundering the principal & the remainder of interest out of circulation & into the possession of central banks (after the peripheral bank takes its cut out of the interest you pay them), only to have political betrayers play their part in laundering this already stolen money (principal & interest) back into circulation, again & again, over & over as ever greater escalations of falsified debt in government expenditure, which is of course mathematically impossible to pay down due to the volumetric impropriety of interest (perpetual deflation) we all formerly pay out of a forever deficient circulation in artificial price inflation in our private falsified debts, that subsequently steals all that much further from us just spending money today.

This tells anyone of sound mind banks have no reserves, not even a central bank has reserves, not even deposits in the bank are the banks reserves when the principal & the remainder of the interest is entirely dedicated to perpetually reflate any given nations circulation.

To even remotely suggest banks are spending or paying what they formerly steal back into circulation is ignoring the cycles of perpetual reflation by every increase in government debt, which we have already proven is the sum of principal & interest the people formerly pay out of circulation in private debt.

If anything what banks spend & or pay in interest on bank deposits amounts to a mere fraction of 1% out of the principal & interest they formerly steal in private debt, where logic tells anyone of sound mind the remaining 99.99% in principal & interest is perpetually laundered out of circulation just servicing our private falsified debts, which is perpetually, then, laundered  back into circulation again as every increase in government debt.

The pseudoscience of today’s false economy is telling everyone the higher the interest rate the less people purport to borrow or spend on a whole, & the lower the interest rate the more people purport to borrow or spend on a whole.

This of course is a false assumption once it dawns on the individual — that any sum of interest we pay out of circulation in all private debt is neither created or issued into circulation above the sum of principal — which sets off these terminal cycles of perpetual deflation & reflation, irreversibly multiplying the overall sum of falsified debt on each & every subsequent cycle of reflation as every new sum of debt, which can only at best service the former sum of falsified debt but never ever pay down any new sum of debt — stealing all that much further from each & everyone of us by however much, or any rate of interest you pay above the sum of principal when we simply spend money.

What this simply means — regardless of the rate of interest — we have to collectively borrow (allegedly borrow) more & more, thus spending more & more just to service the old debt but never the new.

Pure observation & logic alone tells us the reduction of interest rates after a former increase does not reduce the overall price of goods & services already inflated by interest, so its utter folly to ever suggest reducing the rate of interest reduces the overall cost or price of anything when any rate of interest  that  inflates prices is compound regardless, much less does reducing interest rates reduce the overall spending to service the ever greater escalations of falsified debt caused by interest. This in effect refutes the mere unsubstantiated assumption that suggests different rates of interest  determines why people borrow more or less, when the determining factor is instead any rate of interest requires us to borrow (allegedly) even more regardless.

Of course under the present but final terminal cycles of reflation — irreversibly multiplied by interest — most of us can no longer afford higher rates of interest, so interest rates are kept low to temporally sustain purported borrowing for a brief period of time, only as a means to artificially sustain today’s lie of economy for that brief period of time, which can only at best prolong or temper ultimate monetary destruction that little bit longer.

Logically we can further determine higher rates of interest, such as double digits seen in the 80’s can only bring about monetary destruction all that much faster. This is exactly why you will see no substantial increase in interest rates between now & the coming second greater depression, simply due to the sheer enormity of today’s falsified indebtedness irreversibly multiplied by any rate of interest.

In all seriousness you would have to have a brain the size of a pea to ever believe inflation (circulatory), much less growth is even remotely possible so long as we are all paying principal & interest out of a volume of circulation only ever comprised of some remaining principal. The primary school mathematics & rudimentary logic of a kindergarten child essentially tells anyone of sound mind all present & future production, which even includes any increase in our production, whether its any increase in sales, salaries, taxation or phony loans is entirely dedicated to service, but never ever pay down an ever greater escalation of falsified debt, due to any rate of interest purportedly owed to these thieving banks.

“The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous we cannot believe it exists.”
~J. Edgar Hoover

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 02, 2017, last edit July 27, 2017)

 

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Can mathematics predict peoples actions?

02 Sunday Jul 2017

Posted by australia4mpe in Can mathematics predict peoples actions

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

911, Australian banks, bank of England, Bill Still, central bank, coins, Constitution, contract, contractual obligation, credit, debt, deflation, Dennis Kucinich, freedom, G. Edward Griffin, gold, gold standard, illuminati, interest, math’s, mathematically perfected economy, money, plagiarist, promissory note, recession, Ron Paul, Rothschild, silver, solution, sovereignty, Stephen Zarlenga, tax, the great depression, The Secret of Oz, truth, usury, war

Absolutely not, HOWEVER mathematics can be logically applied to determine certain outcomes from peoples actions.

DETERMINE : 1.cause (something) to occur in a particular way or to have a particular nature. 2.ascertain or establish exactly by research or calculation

PREDICT: say or *estimate* (roughly calculate) that a specified thing will happen in the future or will be a consequence of something.

DETERMINE EXAMPLE : If people are paying *principal + interest* out of a forever deficient circulation comprised of only *some remaining principal at most* in all all their personal falsified debts one can then logically determine (NOT PREDICT) by applying primary school mathematics & rudimentary logic that so long as people are paying the added cost of interest above the sum of principal its mathematically impossible to ever have inflation. Determining further that the added cost of unwarranted interest is in fact deflationary or a decrease in value by however much interest you pay above the sum of principal in artificial price inflation that steals even further from us when we spend money, merely artificially sustained by further borrowing (alleged) or purported loans that dont ethically or rationally transpire if the purported lender is neither risking or giving up commensurable consideration of value.

PREDICT EXAMPLE: Banks create & loan money regardless if they risk or give up commensurable consideration & regardless if the sum of interest is neither created or issued into circulation above the sum of principal the interest is nonetheless a surplus of value, therefore price inflation is just the result of printing too much money.

CONCLUSION
Therefore we are not predicting, estimating or roughly calculating anything in Mathematically Perfected Economy, much less are we basing any calculation on mere unsubstantiated assumptions bereft of any formal proof. We are instead logically applying rudimentary principles (IE: 1.1.1 ratio) in extending the mathematics from one point to another to determine, establish, or exactly ascertain a particular occurrence or event if those principles are strictly adhered to.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : June 02, 2017, last edit October 20, 2017)

 

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

FOI request to the Bank of England

01 Saturday Jul 2017

Posted by australia4mpe in FOI request to the Bank of England

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

911, Australian banks, bank of England, banks, Bill Still, central bank, coins, Constitution, contract, contractual obligation, credit, criminals, debt, deflation, Dennis Kucinich, FOI request, freedom, G. Edward Griffin, gold, gold standard, illuminati, inflation, interest, intrinsic, liberty, mandate, math, math’s, mathematically perfected economy, money, plagiarist, promissory note, recession, Ron Paul, Rothschild, silver, solution, sovereignty, tax, the great depression, The Secret of Oz, truth, usury, war

This is the Freedom Of Information request we put to the Bank of England back in 2011 at asking 4 simple questions

1) What lawful consideration do you claim the BoE gives up when it creates money ?
2) How then does the bank (or does the bank) claim there is a debt to the bank ?
3) What is the claim to interest then, when the bank can do no more than absorb the costs of merely publishing evidence of our promissory obligations *to each other* ?
4) How is it possible even to maintain a vital circulation without accumulating inevitably terminal sums of debt ?

Note: The end result was of course as usual “EVASION”.

You can put these questions to any bank, even peripheral banks . Try it & you will basically get the same response . They will evade answering these questions particularly the first knowing all too well if they do it will be self incriminating or admitting to theft.

Think about it — If they’re not stealing in the form of pretend loans they would simply answer the damn questions wouldn’t they? but their pathetic excuse for not answering them is that these questions are unintelligible. In the end the BoE claimed the expense they would have to forgo finding the answers to these simple questions would be too costly for them. Too costly for them alright because if they answered the questions it would end their crime of theft & they damn well know it.

All they have to do is answer the first question really, because if they can prove they give up consideration of commensurable value in the creation or any loan of money the following questions are made redundant, except question 4 of course, simply due the current escalations of debt, which they then have to explain how & why is not terminal, which we already know they cant answer, because no one on this planet can prove or demonstrate how the sum of interest is created & issued into circulation above the sum of principal that takes us back to question 1 again. In retrospect questions 2, 3 & 4 take you back to question 1, which is why its the first question, that’s hardly unintelligible.

Its really a YES or NO answer to the first question. Do you give up consideration of value in the creation of money? . Is your answer YES or NO?. If your answer is YES what consideration are you then giving up in the creation of money ? but they refuse to even do that. Unintelligible my arse — The question couldn’t be any more simpler.

We are only asking the bank the same question we would otherwise ask ourselves to identify who exactly is creating money, determining then if any loan transpires or not. So If anyone of us was asked if we give up consideration of value in the creation of money the answer would be logically YES, & if asked what consideration are we giving up — pure observation alone tells anyone with a half a brain that we are giving up our labour & production that has the only lawful consideration of commensurable value.

So if it is we who create all new money, which we have already proven to be the case for nearly 50 years already, predominately by the purchaser who issues a promissory obligation/note before publication, before any subsequent deposit — so how is it even ethically or rationally possible for the “obligor” (creator of money) to borrow what has not yet been paid & or deposited from the resulting sale?

The simple answer its not possible. To suggest we loan or borrow money from each other defies all logic & reason — putting the cart before the horse. Indicating further we are not even loaning or borrowing money from each other either, much less from a thieving bank. When the unadulterated debt is merely an obligation by the *obligor* to “pay & retire” the principal, free from exploitation or unjust intervention.

Make no mistake MPE is NOT claiming there is no debt,  simply because the only debt that transpires is the true debt we have  to each other. Therefore the argument is not to somehow get out of paying the debt altogether, but instead the intent to restore today’s falsified debts (phony loans) to their original unadulterated state where there never is any loan or borrowing.

For detailed correspondence regarding this FOI request please visit WhatDoTheyKnow. OR HERE.

Please note “whatdotheyknow” have since taken down the detailed correspondence which can only be perceived as further EVASION of the facts.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

 

(Published : July 01, 2017, last edit January 19, 2019)

 

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Pretended experts in economy

01 Saturday Jul 2017

Posted by australia4mpe in Pretended experts in economy

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

911, Australian banks, bank of England, banks, Bill Still, central bank, contract, contractual obligation, criminals, Dennis Kucinich, experts in economy, freedom, G. Edward Griffin, gold, gold standard, interest, intrinsic, mandate, math’s, mathematically perfected economy, plagiarist, promissory note, Ron Paul, Rothschild, solution, sovereignty, Stephen Zarlenga, tax, the great depression, The Secret of Oz, truth, usury, war

Some time ago I had a fellow with a doctorate in economics question why I use the word “volume”. He proceeded to then hold some authority over me because according to him today’s economics does not use volumes & because I do not have a degree like him in today’s lie of economy I have no authority on the subject, evidently because I’m using volumes apparently.

My reply was quite simple when I proceeded to ask him if today’s economics uses percentages to demonstrate rates of profit, margins of solubility or purported growth how is this not a measurement in respect to volume?

For example if you have a 25%  profit is this not telling you that 25% exceeds the volume of 100%  invested?

So if you invest $80 & get back $100 is this not a 25% gain or alternatively a $20 gain in proportion to the initial $80 investment. Therefore $80 is your 100% volume or overall outlay & $20 is your 25% gain.

Eg:  $80 = 100% ÷ 4 = $20 = 25% 

In short the percentage (%) is a scale used to measure something as a fraction comparative to associated volume.

So If you want to take down any phony economist in one question just ask them what is a volume of circulation that is neither above or below its intended representation? or in broad obscure terms otherwise taught in universities that might make some sense to these buffoons; What is a volume of circulation that is neither above or below the cost of goods & services (ie:representation).

Without giving away the answer here its simply a question of logic that extends the mathematics from one point to another.

Hint: if “C” is neither above “I” or below “D” what is “C” in proportion to “V”?

Of course its a Circulation always [_____] in Volume , or alternatively a circulation always [______] in Value in proportion to the Volume of Circulation relating to the dispositional impropriety of Inflation & Deflation in respect to represented property, which gives you the same answer of logic anyhow.

Those of you who cant immediately answer this question I suggest you read the home page or seek the answer in the menu.

I’m nonetheless still waiting for this pretended expert’s answer, which is an answer so simple it equates to the rudimentary logic of a kindergarten child putting a square peg through a square hole.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 01, 2017, last edit July 09, 2017)

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
← Older posts

MPE Categories

  • HOME (click header above)
  • ONE PROBLEM (NEW)
  • ONE TRUTH (NEW)
  • ONE SOLUTION (NEW)
  • MIKES MODEL
  • THE MATHEMATICS
  • 2013 MANDATE
  • GLOSSARY OF TERMS
  • POD CASTS
  • AUSTRALIAN DEBT CLOCK
  • DICTIONARY
  • (Android & iOS)

Related Posts (NEW)

FOI request Bank of England

Banks have no poof of claim

Gross Domestic Product

Debt Securities

Origin of money

Aussie Elections

True Debt vs Falsified Debt

Surplus vs Deficit

Money vs Credit

Promise vs IOU

Money vs Receipts

Good Debt vs Bad Debt

Referendum vs Plebiscite

Determine vs Predict

Trading EQUAL production

Money laundering

Pretended experts

Fractional Reserve Banking

Economic buffoonery

MPE Cult Propaganda

The cost of a home

Supply & Demand

The Ancient Ruse

Share Markets

Bankruptcy

Boom & Bust

Global Debt

Buying local

Super theft

Inflation

Taxation

Growth

WAR

NON-SOLUTIONS (NEW)

Debt free money

Nationalizing banks

Interest free banking

Moneyless trade

Banking regulation

Gold standard

Bitcoin/Cryptocurrency

Quantitative Easing & Bailouts

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 66 other subscribers

Contact Admin

David Ardron

Notes from Admin

Updates & Comment etiquette

ARCHIVE

Former Posts under revision

Blog Stats

  • 60,808 hits

  • Follow Following
    • Australia for Mathematically Perfected Economy™
    • Join 66 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Australia for Mathematically Perfected Economy™
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: