Category Archives: Uncategorized

Global Debt

18 Tuesday Jul 2017

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

According to a review by the Bank or International Settlements (BIS) global debts public & private reached 100 trillion in mid-2013, & estimates today mid-2017 are well over 200 trillion.

As a matter of pure observation if global debt doubles up (irreversibly multiplies due to interest) every two or three years the global debt by 2019-20 will be around 400 trillion.

By 2023 it should be somewhere in excess of 1 quadrillion, but lets be conservative & say 800 trillion.

Now If the world hasn’t already entered into a hell fire economic depression of no return by 2023 it most definitely will by 2026 where the debt would have multiplied to around 1.6 quadrillion.

Of course if you believe in the infinite milk & honey fairy tail of today’s lie economy by 2029-30 it should be somewhere around 3.2 quadrillion.

I ask a simple question to the reader can you imagine the cost of living in just 10-15 years, or won’t we be living?

Think about it.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 18, 2017, last edit July 18, 2017)

 

The Ancient Ruse

16 Sunday Jul 2017

Posted by in The Ancient Ruse, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Before we begin it is important to note the ancient ruse of the money changer dating back to 33AD was morphed into a pretend loan by today’s purported banking in 1150AD.

The money changers in 33AD were essentially exchanging 1 talent in one denominated currency for 2 talents of another denominated currency, both of which talents where nearly the same weight or measure by a matter of grams back then.

To actually purchase in the market an individual would first have to give a money changer 2 talents in coin & in return receive 1 talent in another coin, so one can at least trade in the market with that specific talent of coin (eg: bank money).

Basically the money changers were robbing an individual of 1 talent for risking nothing of their own by simply exchanging 1 for 2 — taking 100% unearned profit. This unjust intervention in all markets today is of course the banks first crime of theft — stealing a sum of principal.

Since 1150AD the ancient ruse of the money changer that steals 100% in principal has been disguised as a loan, which is in truth a purported loan that neither ethically or rationally transpires in the first place, only as a means to purposely hide an age old  theft that was otherwise so blatantly obvious.

Logically if an individual paid a money changer any more than 2 talents for only receiving 1 talent its therefore paying interest to a money changer for reasons I will explain in the following paragraphs.

Of course we can determine the only difference to ancient money changers exchanging 1 for 2  is  modern day money changers are exchanging 1 for 1 by merely publishing further representations of the money we create. In truth banks are only pretending to exchange 1 for 1, simply because there is only 1 talent of commensurable value representing what value you give up by promising your immediate & or future production before publication — before any sale or subsequent deposit — where its clearly evident the bank is only ever pretending to risk or give up 1 talent in value from the banks otherwise prior legitimate possession.

In essence the banks sleight of hand is basically handing the principal value you just created back to you in a pretend loan so you can trade in the market, & only then as a consequence thereafter charge you a further sum of principal in unwarranted interest for the privilege of being robbed of 1 talent in the first place.

We can likewise further determine the unjust  imposition of unwarranted interest is therefore the banks second crime of theft — resulting from the first crime of theft — stealing 2 talents in total or 2X the principal  for neither risking or giving up anything of value.

Considering the ancient money changers got away with stealing 100% for so long it only stands to reason why today’s modern day money changers, or what are commonly referred to as banks are getting away with stealing 200% plus — when you are all duped into actually believing the bank loans you money in the first place.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 16, 2017, last edit August 15, 2017)

The GDP Paradox

07 Friday Jul 2017

Posted by in The GDP Paradox, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is said to be a estimate of a nations economic growth. How a country’s GDP is calculated is using the following formula:

GDP = C + G + I + NX.

“C” is equal to all private Consumption, or Consumer spending in a nation’s economy, “G” is the sum of Government spending,  “I” is the sum of all the country’s investment, including businesses capital expenditures & “NX” is the Nation’s total net exports, calculated as total exports minus total imports (NX = Exports – Imports).

Where this formula gets it totally wrong is it just assumes private consumption (C) is equal to consumer spending & the total business Investment (I) is an addition, which is failing to account for the sum of principal + interest payed out of a forever deficient volume of  circulation only ever comprised of some remaining principal.

As a result this is likewise failing to conclude that most if not all government expenditure (G) is not investing taxation into any nation, but instead perpetually reintroducing or laundering the principal & interest formerly stolen out of circulation in all private debt back into circulation again as an ever greater escalation of government debt. This is in fact what funds government expenditure, apposed to taxation that is likewise paid out of circulation — either directly or indirectly into the banks coffers to service the ever greater escalations of government debt.

Although GDP accounts for imports & exports (NX) this only accounts for just one variable of reflation & deflation under banking.

Therefore what makes GDP an insane contradictory paradox is firstly it is adding the sum of deflation instead of subtracting it which irrationally estimates growth based upon non-existent inflation, & secondly even if we did have inflation you can not just assume any existence of inflation is a true indicator of growth either.

“Real growth, however, can only be determined when any increase in circulation is always equal to remaining debt & always equal to represented property value, where there quite literally is no inflation or deflation.”

So too is Debt-to-GDP misleading not only because the GDP aggregate itself is failing to subtract what it is always adding, but the debt is only referencing government debt apposed to all debt including private debt. It is assumed a low Debt-to-GDP ratio indicates a country is producing enough to service its debt without incurring further debt, which is mathematically impossible regardless so long as we are all paying the added cost of interest in private debt. This is in effect what artificially inflates prices by however much interest we pay out of circulation above the sum of principal just spending money today, that is at any given point in time deflationary (circulatory deflation) in regards to the remaining volume of circulation always available to industry & commerce.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 07, 2017, last edit Nov 11, 2017)

 

The cost of a home under the ruse of banking

05 Wednesday Jul 2017

Posted by in The cost of a home under the ruse of banking, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This home more than likely cost around 20K when it was built brand new sometime in the 1960s.

Contrary to what we are irrationally led to believe that suggest homes can only ever go up in value – homes are in fact depreciating in value. Logic tells anyone a home will fall down in 100 years if left neglected.

Furthermore due to the added cost of interest a home is artificially inflated in price by however much interest you pay above the sum of principal, which is in effect devaluing the home far beyond its otherwise remaining consumption or deprecation value by simply a theft of value, because banks who purport to loan all new money into circulation in the first place neither risk or give up consideration of commensurable value from the banks otherwise prior legitimate possession, making the purported loan a monumental crime of theft &  the unwarranted imposition of interest a further crime of theft yet again, which is artificially sustained by further falsified debts that perpetually reflates a forever deficient circulation with irreversible sums of falsified indebtedness.

In this example you are paying the value of 37.5 homes to a thieving bank for only receiving one home with a true value of 20K minus consumption, & if you purportedly borrowed the 750K to purchase this home today you are basically paying another 37.5 homes again to a thieving bank in unwarranted interest tomorrow. Totaling 75 homes (750%) or 1.5 million for a home worth less than 20K ($20,000 X 75 = 1.5 million).

Essentially the true value of this home has depreciated 750% below or beyond  its otherwise remaining consumption value due to banks robbing everyone blind when they purchase homes, because any price inflation caused by the added cost of  interest — irreversibly multiplied by however much interest you pay out of circulation above the sum of principal — can only ever be stealing all that much further from us when we just spend money today.

Of course this artificial increase in price caused by the added cost of interest is giving most if not all people the illusion of increasing value when its instead the complete polar opposite due to a monumental crime of theft of that value (eg: $20,000 X 75) — that can only be irreversibly multiplied by unwarranted interest yet again — stealing all that much further from us again & again & again.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 04, 2017, last edit July 09, 2017)

 

How do banks launder money?

02 Sunday Jul 2017

Posted by in How banks launder money, Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

It’s quite simple really, because what peripheral banks (eg: ANZ Bank) steal from you in phony loans & every time you spend money today is laundered into the hands of a central bank via what we are led to believe is inter-bank lending, where the central banks subsequently use this stolen money to purchase treasury bonds not only in your nation, but in other nations abroad that perpetually reflates any given nations deficient circulation with already stolen money.

One could say the practice of banking is a monumental crime of theft & with the help of treasonous political betrayers its one big money laundering racket, essentially moving stolen money all over the world generally through central banks to reflate a nations circulation with irreversible multiplications of national debt.

Of course central banks are not the only purchasers of national debt. Peripheral banks, banking corporations such as insurance & investment companies also purchase treasury bonds, & a small percentage of pension funds also that banks pilfer anyway when markets periodically drop or crash due to the volumetric impropriety of interest anyhow.

So what is a “Bank Bill Swap Rate” (BBSR)?

Simply putting it its the rate of interest on what we are led to believe is inter-bank lending, which is of course a process that launders stolen money, formerly stolen in all private debt to subsequently reflate any given nations circulation as irreversible multiplications of falsified debt.

Often when you hear other nations purchasing your nations national debt it means the banks in those other nations are stealing money from the people in that other nation via their private debt to perpetually reflate your nations circulation via your national debt & visa versa.

As a result a portion of your taxation is paid to the banks in those other nations & visa versa, only to service but never pay down any given nations falsified debt. Concluding all banking or the practice of purported banking in itself is an inherent international money laundering racket, even your little ole bank down the corner plays its part robbing you with a smile.

Of course some of you might question if BBSR is referring to the inter-banking interest rates how can we be paying the banks interest?

Well, Its all quite simple really because we are all servicing or paying the banks inter-banking debts via our own personal falsified debts, which are purported loans that do not ethically or rationally even transpire in the first place, simply because the banks (all banks including central banks) are neither risking or giving up commensurable consideration of value themselves.

Furthermore we can deduce now the difference in interest rates we pay any peripheral bank in all private debt which is at a higher rate of interest — comparative to what banks pay each other in interest or ultimately to a central bank which is at a lower rate of interest — is the peripheral banks unearned gain or unjust reward for stealing & laundering the principal & the remainder of interest out of circulation & into the possession of central banks (after the peripheral bank takes its cut out of the interest you pay them), only to have political betrayers play their part in laundering this already stolen money (principal & interest) back into circulation, again & again, over & over as ever greater escalations of falsified debt in government expenditure, which is of course mathematically impossible to pay down due to the volumetric impropriety of interest (perpetual deflation) we all formerly pay out of a forever deficient circulation in artificial price inflation in our private falsified debts, that subsequently steals all that much further from us just spending money today.

This tells anyone of sound mind banks have no reserves, not even a central bank has reserves, not even deposits in the bank are the banks reserves when the principal & the remainder of the interest is entirely dedicated to perpetually reflate any given nations circulation.

To even remotely suggest banks are spending or paying what they formerly steal back into circulation is ignoring the cycles of perpetual reflation by every increase in government debt, which we have already proven is the sum of principal & interest the people formerly pay out of circulation in private debt.

If anything what banks spend & or pay in interest on bank deposits amounts to a mere fraction of 1% out of the principal & interest they formerly steal in private debt, where logic tells anyone of sound mind the remaining 99.99% in principal & interest is perpetually laundered out of circulation just servicing our private falsified debts, which is perpetually, then, laundered  back into circulation again as every increase in government debt.

The pseudoscience of today’s false economy is telling everyone the higher the interest rate the less people purport to borrow or spend on a whole, & the lower the interest rate the more people purport to borrow or spend on a whole.

This of course is a false assumption once it dawns on the individual — that any sum of interest we pay out of circulation in all private debt is neither created or issued into circulation above the sum of principal — which sets off these terminal cycles of perpetual deflation & reflation, irreversibly multiplying the overall sum of falsified debt on each & every subsequent cycle of reflation as every new sum of debt, which can only at best service the former sum of falsified debt but never ever pay down any new sum of debt — stealing all that much further from each & everyone of us by however much, or any rate of interest you pay above the sum of principal when we simply spend money.

What this simply means — regardless of the rate of interest — we have to collectively borrow (allegedly borrow) more & more, thus spending more & more just to service the old debt but never the new.

Pure observation & logic alone tells us the reduction of interest rates after a former increase does not reduce the overall price of goods & services already inflated by interest, so its utter folly to ever suggest reducing the rate of interest reduces the overall cost or price of anything when any rate of interest  that  inflates prices is compound regardless, much less does reducing interest rates reduce the overall spending to service the ever greater escalations of falsified debt caused by interest. This in effect refutes the mere unsubstantiated assumption that suggests different rates of interest  determines why people borrow more or less, when the determining factor is instead any rate of interest requires us to borrow (allegedly) even more regardless.

Of course under the present but final terminal cycles of reflation — irreversibly multiplied by interest — most of us can no longer afford higher rates of interest, so interest rates are kept low to temporally sustain purported borrowing for a brief period of time, only as a means to artificially sustain today’s lie of economy for that brief period of time, which can only at best prolong or temper ultimate monetary destruction that little bit longer.

Logically we can further determine higher rates of interest, such as double digits seen in the 80’s can only bring about monetary destruction all that much faster. This is exactly why you will see no substantial increase in interest rates between now & the coming second greater depression, simply due to the sheer enormity of today’s falsified indebtedness irreversibly multiplied by any rate of interest.

In all seriousness you would have to have a brain the size of a pea to ever believe inflation (circulatory), much less growth is even remotely possible so long as we are all paying principal & interest out of a volume of circulation only ever comprised of some remaining principal. The primary school mathematics & rudimentary logic of a kindergarten child essentially tells anyone of sound mind all present & future production, which even includes any increase in our production, whether its any increase in sales, salaries, taxation or phony loans is entirely dedicated to service, but never ever pay down an ever greater escalation of falsified debt, due to any rate of interest purportedly owed to these thieving banks.

“The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous we cannot believe it exists.”
~J. Edgar Hoover

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 02, 2017, last edit July 27, 2017)

 

Buffoonery of Pretended Economists

01 Saturday Jul 2017

Posted by in Buffoonery of Pretended Economists, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The purported economist (Richard Werner) in the video below is contradicting himself every which way to justify the lie banks create & loan money, & in all insanity this buffoon is suggesting this money is created out of nothing or thin air, which could not be any further from the truth.

Its all quite simple if you stick to the verifiable facts without contradicting or compromising those facts.

Lets be very clear banks do not create money, NOT EVER, not just because banks or mere publishers give up no consideration of commensurable value but because we the people are creating this money all along instead by giving up the only consideration of commensurable value, so what can those of us who are sound mind logically conclude from this simple observation of verifiable fact?

1) Banks are logically not creating money because the bank is neither risking or giving the consideration of value you give up, which is hardly thin air, nothing or fictitious.

2) Banks are logically not loaning you *YOUR* money because the bank neither risks or gives up consideration of value from its otherwise prior legitimate possession to even rationally justify any loan from the bank to you, much less the taking of interest.

3) Banks are logically not purchasing or borrowing your promissory note / security / money because the bank neither risks or gives up consideration of value to otherwise rationally justify any purchase between you & the bank took place, much less any loan from you to the bank.

4) Banks are logically stealing the value of our production we give up to each other in any trade or transaction , ”X2″ due to unwarranted interest by simply pretending to loan all the money WE CREATE (principal only) into circulation in the first place. In other words the purported loan is not a loan at all, neither ethically or rationally, but instead a monumental crime of theft.

5) Logically economist Richard Werner & associates (phony experts in economy) & usury media alike are throwing the baby out with the bathwater to irrationally justify an oxymoron (ie: banks create money out of nothing) & a myriad of other barefaced LIES thereafter as a result.

Do not be fooled by these 11th hour pretenders folks. To irrationally suggest banks create money from nothing is to likewise suggest banks are stealing nothing, which is denying a monumental crime of theft.

So no matter how these buffoons obscure the facts the purported loan never transpires anyway, not from the bank to one of us, nor from one of us to the bank. No legitimate sale ever transpires between the bank or anyone because the business of banking is not commerce but piracy. Whichever way you look at this however distorted by pretend economists the bank gives up no commensurable consideration of value from its otherwise prior legitimate possession in any debt, trade, sale or transaction. Therefore the purported loan is a monumental crime of theft, subsequently stealing the value WE THE PEOPLE give to all money & property that is hardly nothing or thin air.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 01, 2017, last edit July 27, 2017)

Good Debt vs Bad Debt

01 Saturday Jul 2017

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The following is the basic difference between Good debt & Bad debt, without the bullshit from some halfwit politician, pretend economist or news reporter who clearly failed primary school mathematics.

GOOD DEBT
Is when we logically eradicate the need for perpetual reflation by simply eradicating the unwarranted imposition of interest on falsified debts (phony loans) & therefore eradicating the ruse of banking altogether that neither ethically or rationally lends us money in the first place, where any increase in circulation can otherwise instead equal the remaining debt & equal the related property value by *rightfully retiring principal* (NOT STEALING & LAUNDERING) at the rate of depreciation or consumption of the related property.

BAD DEBT
Is when purported banks only ever pretend to loan us the sum of principal, where the bank is neither risking or giving up commensurable consideration of value from the banks otherwise prior legitimate possession that might justify any loan to one of us, which is nonetheless charging us a further sum of principal again in unwarranted interest for the privilege of being robbed of the former sum of principal in a purported loan that in truth never transpires, that subsequently as a result sets of these terminal cycles of deflation & reflation. Primarily due to the volumetric impropriety of interest (perpetual deflation) we all formerly pay out of circulation in all private debt, which not only irreversibly multiplies both government & private debt in perpetual cycles of reflation, but the very process reflation can only ever be artificially sustained with further falsified debt.

Therefore the process of perpetual deflation by interest & perpetual reflation with new debt that never increases the remaining circulation above the sum of principal can only ever at best service the former debt, BUT NEVER THE NEW due to the added cost of interest banks clearly steal above the sum of principal inclusive in purported loans, which is stealing all that much further from us in artificial price inflation when each & everyone of us just spends money today.

IN SHORT FOR THE DUMMIES.
Bad debt: Is a so called loan that in truth never transpires, making the purported loan a monumental crime of theft instead.

Good debt: Is merely an obligation by the debtor (obligor/creator of money/one of us) to *pay & retire* principal — free from unjust intervention or exploitation — where there never was or ever is any loan or borrowing.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 01, 2017, last edit October 09, 2017)

 

Is Quantitative Easing another slight of hand of the thief?

30 Friday Jun 2017

Posted by in Quantitative Easing, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

To begin lets  study the bullshit in this article below that would have you irrationally believing the lie Quantitative easing (QE) creates new money, which is just a further attempt to justify non-existent inflation as inflation. If I may quote from the usury media article below.

“Policymakers also push the button on a quantitative easing programme – which will pump tens of billions of pounds of newly created money into Britain’s troubled economy.”

Article

How do we know this is bullshit, well firstly all you have to do is look at the official data in the UK (see below) regarding its money supply (M0) from March to December 2009 & you will clearly see there was no increase of £125bn in the money supply at that time, which would have otherwise near tripled the nations (M0) cash & coin monetary supply.

All that transpired in 2009 was instead a increase of 2 billion (M0) in new cash & coin that we the people create anyhow because it further represents a percentage or fraction of ledger money (M2) that includes bank deposits in circulation anyhow, plus an increase of an additional 1.1 trillion in (M2) ledger bank deposit money we create in purported loans in private debt. Keeping in mind a portion of that 1.1 trillion is money likewise earned or unearned from overseas that is nonetheless money we create in private debt in any nation.

So in ether graph (M0) & (M2) you see the increase in the UK money supply remains steady as the years pass primarily due to perpetual reflation as every increase in government debt, which  irreversibly multiplies all this falsified debt into terminal debt due to the volumetric impropriety of interest (perpetual deflation) in all private debt, hence the need for perpetual reflation in government debt that is mathematically impossible to pay down, which is a process of perpetual deflation & reflation that cant ever increase the remaining circulation above or beyond the sum of principal initially created in private debt.

UK Graph data

Secondly logic alone should tell you banks do not ever create money, much less ever loan money if they neither risk or give up consideration of value, concluding its we the people who create all new money (principal only) in private debt because we give up the only commensurable consideration of value in the only true debt, trade or transaction, however due to peoples irresponsibility they allow banks to purposely misrepresented our debts to each other in alleged loans from a thieving bank, which is a falsified debt to a thieving bank who gives up squat.

WHAT THEN IS QUANTITATIVE EASING EXACTLY?

Well, its similar in respects to a bailout. That is both of which are only ever servicing inter-banking debt or in house debt between banks, which is ultimately between banks & the central bank of any nation.

Try to Imagine a big fat central banker pouring already stolen money out of the left pocket & into the right pocket, because this is whats essentially happening where qualitative easing (QE) is bypassing the direct purchase of government debt where a bailout otherwise would not.

The only difference then is the bailout increases government debt as the money travels from one pocket to another, & QE bypasses the direct purchase of any new government debt in the sense its indirectly purchasing formerly purchased government debt from banks or other banking corporations, so the process of QE is not increasing government debt by purchasing new bonds, but instead previously purchased bonds from other banks before their maturity date, so in effect the central bank gets that money back from the taxpayer plus interest when those bonds mature.

Whichever the process BAILOUTS or QE its only ever temporally solving any outstanding inter-banking debt between banks, simply because the people can no longer service this inter-banking debt via their own personal falsified debts anymore due to interest of course, which is all owed (allegedly owed) to the central bank (mere publisher) anyhow.

Whether its a bailout or QE its never reaching industry & commerce or never reaching the people in this lie of economy today in the entire process of both.

We could almost debate if the central bank even parts with any sum of QE because its ultimately owed (allegedly) to the central bank anyway, hence the QE is just another sleight of hand of a thief, which is just a thief taking already stolen money out of one pocket & just quietly slipping it back in the other pocket, & hey presto the bankers fool see’s the big fat central banker create all this new money out of thin air (NOT),, & apparently its somehow magically increasing a monetary circulation to justify inflation that is clearly non-existent..

So the reader might ask now whats ultimately transpiring with that stolen money in the big fat central bankers pocket?

Well, with the assistance of political betrayers its perpetually laundered back into the monetary circulation as every increase in government debt or federal expenditure, perpetually reflating circulation as we the people consecutively pay principal & interest out of circulation in all private debt .

This is why the graph above shows a steady increase in the money supply (principal only) that we people initially create in private debt regardless, apposed to any dramatic jump in the money supply that possibly might otherwise justify qualitative easing pumping all this new money into circulation to further justify inflation which  is clearly non-existent, much like any phony loan to us in private debt, where a thieving bank is pretending to create new money yet again & would have you irrationally believe just by increasing the circulation by principal alone is inflationary. Which is false assumption so long as were all paying *principal+interest* out of a general circulation only ever comprised of some remaining *principal* at most.

No one on the face of this planet can prove or demonstrate how any sum of interest is created or issued into circulation above the some of principal.

Hypothetically even if QE creates new money above the sum of principal we initially create in all private debt — that 125 billion is nothing compared to the trillions (M2) we create & pay out of circulation in all private debt — stolen many, many, many times over in  perpetual cycles of deflation due to interest.

Therefore regardless if a mere 125 billion somehow magically appears in the monetary circulation as new money, WHICH IT DID NOT, not without any sale, trade or transaction to otherwise pump it into any lie of economy it cant possibly justify inflation regardless, not so long as we are all paying billions if not trillions in principal + interest out of circulation.

If any of you want more evidence look no further than the current UK national debt (perpetual reflation).

Here again I’m using logic alone & primary school mathematics to prove banks do not ever create money, not even by quantitative easing, much less can QE stimulate non-existent growth or justify non-existent inflation, not that inflation can be any rational indicator of true sustainable growth.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)


(Published : June 30, 2017, last edit July 09, 2017)

 

Is Bitcoin the solution?

30 Friday Jun 2017

Posted by in bitcoin, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

BITCOIN suggests to seek their wiki FAQ page for more information about   bitcoin where it defines “ stabilize ” to “ sticky economics ” which is based on what is a broad range of mere unqualified assumptions & LIES, which could not be any further away from being stable, so in other words bitCON has no means to solve inflation & deflation & nor will it.

To actually claim BitCONS have value as bitcoin suggests because they are useful & because they are scarce is  not  only admitting BitCON has unaccountable representation but likewise has a volumetric impropriety to begin with as any gold standard would or had in the past, * useful * does not qualify immutable representation nor does * scarcity *  qualify stable whatsoever.

Scarcity of money today by imposed interest on a falsified debt is the very reason why we have a irreversible multiplication of artificial debt, so be assured as soon as bitcoin starts lending, ( SEE HERE WHERE BITCON HAS BEEN GIVEN THE GO AHEAD TO OPERATE AS A BANK ) they have just stepped into the bankers shoes of terminal exploitation. Actually they already have one shoe on because they are complying with banking regulation, which is the very reason why there is an exchange of bank money to acquire Bitcoins in the first place, thus any bitcoin value is not only wholly artificial but is logically a further misrepresentation derived from a former misrepresentation — originating from the banks purposed obfuscation of our promissory obligations we have to each other.

Contrary to those advocating bitcoin merely assuming it has no connection to banking whatsoever — the connection is not only to initially purchase bitcoin with bank money, SEE HERE & HERE , but bitcoin has to likewise conform with the current banking regulation , SEE HERE .

The idea of microeconomics or competing currencies within a nation  fails at its core concept by not addressing the nation’s volume of circulation on a macro level first, & the very act of exchanging money & property with another currency subject to artificial manipulation such as today’s bank money opens up the door for one currency adversely affecting another – that may or may not otherwise have an adverse volumetric disposition.

Micro currencies competing within any nation is an epic fail of rudimentary logic & is stupid as stupid gets, simply because it fails to address how one currency & its represented property effects the volume of another currency & its represented property upon any exchange?.

In truth greed blinds most if not all people to the fact cryptocurencies are online gambling rackets much like online casinos. The only difference is you can spend your chips outside the casino at recommended retail outlets who likewise gamble at your choice of casino, & or alternatively you can simply cash your chips in at the casino & purchase whatever.

Now if the creators of bitCON think they have already addressed inflation & deflation using references from today’s LIE of economy “ sticky economics ”, more the fools who put their trust in these charlatans ignorantly believing bitCON is a economic or monetary solution.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : June 30, 2017, last edit March 02, 2018)

Is gold a viable solution?

30 Friday Jun 2017

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Absolutely not, simply because there is not enough volume of gold out there to equal all our labour & production, much less equal any increase in our production.

The inherent volumetric impropriety (perpetual deflation) of any finite metal such as gold acts much the same as the volumetric impropriety of interest perpetually devaluing our production & the physical gold or money itself it further represents.

Having gold as an unnecessary further representation of our labour & production yet again is utter buffoonery, considering our labour & production already has the only intrinsic value & the added volumetric impropriety of interest can only escalate terminal monetary destruction all that much faster, which is the very reason why gold is no longer used to represent our production, primarily as a means to prolong monetary destruction even further so banks can keep on stealing the value of our labour & production & not devalue the gold they have already stolen.

Considering banks do not ever create money or ever give up consideration of value in any purported loan to one of us LOGICALLY all gold that once represented money in the past has already been physically stolen by banking in falsified debts that are mathematically impossible to pay down, if not due to the inherent volumetric impropriety of gold itself its by interest or both.

Therefore even if we eradicated the crime of banking & or interest returning a gold standard or even using physical gold coin as currency is stupid as stupid gets because you are still left with perpetual, monumental deflation.

All those who believe gold can somehow hold the solution only proves to me these deranged individuals not only failed primary school mathematics but do not even know what money is, how its really created & what it truly represents, which is not a gold coin or gold bar, but instead the value of our labour & production that has the only intrinsic value all money past, present & future records, evidences & represents.

What these fools fail to conclude is its only the volume of money, regardless if the tokens of representation are in the form of fiat/paper, gold/coin/bar, coffee beans, rum, or dog shit–money ultimately has to equal our labour & production in volume. So unless you want to carry around dog shit in your pocket fiat/paper money is the only viable rational alternative .

Of course you could carry around gold coins in your pocket, however as we increase our production those coins will be getting smaller & smaller in size/weight/volume to equal any increase in production, which is not only devaluing the physical gold itself, but devaluing what that gold is supposed represent— in our labour & production.

In other words the money itself is only numbers in volume that further represents the underpinning value of our labour & production, or our hard earned, blood sweat & tears we give up to each other, which is hardly nothing or thin air, otherwise banks would not be stealing the value of our labour & production in purported loans that do not ethically or even rationally transpire in the first place .

I have literally lost count how many times I have proven to the world gold is not a viable monetary solution, it never has as a matter of verifiable mathematical fact, but unfortunately there are those out there who still insist gold is the viable solution, without proving & even demonstrating it ever has been a viable solution or ever can be a viable solution.

So the question I ask these deranged individuals is where is your mathematics? Where is your logic? How do you account for deflation?

The simple answer is you cant, because you have thrown all rudimentary logic & mathematics out the window & instead solely relying on mere conjecture, unqualified assumptions & more often barefaced lies to sell non-solution only as if it was a solution.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)


(Published : June 30, 2017, last edit July 09, 2017)