• HOME (click header above)
  • ONE PROBLEM (NEW)
  • ONE TRUTH (NEW)
  • ONE SOLUTION (NEW)
  • MIKES MODEL
  • THE MATHEMATICS
  • 2013 MANDATE
  • GLOSSARY OF TERMS
  • POD CASTS
  • AUSTRALIAN DEBT CLOCK
  • DICTIONARY
  • (Android & iOS)

Australia for Mathematically Perfected Economy™

Australia for Mathematically Perfected Economy™

Tag Archives: Bill Still

Can mathematics predict peoples actions?

02 Sunday Jul 2017

Posted by australia4mpe in Can mathematics predict peoples actions

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

911, Australian banks, bank of England, Bill Still, central bank, coins, Constitution, contract, contractual obligation, credit, debt, deflation, Dennis Kucinich, freedom, G. Edward Griffin, gold, gold standard, illuminati, interest, math’s, mathematically perfected economy, money, plagiarist, promissory note, recession, Ron Paul, Rothschild, silver, solution, sovereignty, Stephen Zarlenga, tax, the great depression, The Secret of Oz, truth, usury, war

Absolutely not, HOWEVER mathematics can be logically applied to determine certain outcomes from peoples actions.

DETERMINE : 1.cause (something) to occur in a particular way or to have a particular nature. 2.ascertain or establish exactly by research or calculation

PREDICT: say or *estimate* (roughly calculate) that a specified thing will happen in the future or will be a consequence of something.

DETERMINE EXAMPLE : If people are paying *principal + interest* out of a forever deficient circulation comprised of only *some remaining principal at most* in all all their personal falsified debts one can then logically determine (NOT PREDICT) by applying primary school mathematics & rudimentary logic that so long as people are paying the added cost of interest above the sum of principal its mathematically impossible to ever have inflation. Determining further that the added cost of unwarranted interest is in fact deflationary or a decrease in value by however much interest you pay above the sum of principal in artificial price inflation that steals even further from us when we spend money, merely artificially sustained by further borrowing (alleged) or purported loans that dont ethically or rationally transpire if the purported lender is neither risking or giving up commensurable consideration of value.

PREDICT EXAMPLE: Banks create & loan money regardless if they risk or give up commensurable consideration & regardless if the sum of interest is neither created or issued into circulation above the sum of principal the interest is nonetheless a surplus of value, therefore price inflation is just the result of printing too much money.

CONCLUSION
Therefore we are not predicting, estimating or roughly calculating anything in Mathematically Perfected Economy, much less are we basing any calculation on mere unsubstantiated assumptions bereft of any formal proof. We are instead logically applying rudimentary principles (IE: 1.1.1 ratio) in extending the mathematics from one point to another to determine, establish, or exactly ascertain a particular occurrence or event if those principles are strictly adhered to.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : June 02, 2017, last edit October 20, 2017)

 

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

FOI request to the Bank of England

01 Saturday Jul 2017

Posted by australia4mpe in FOI request to the Bank of England

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

911, Australian banks, bank of England, banks, Bill Still, central bank, coins, Constitution, contract, contractual obligation, credit, criminals, debt, deflation, Dennis Kucinich, FOI request, freedom, G. Edward Griffin, gold, gold standard, illuminati, inflation, interest, intrinsic, liberty, mandate, math, math’s, mathematically perfected economy, money, plagiarist, promissory note, recession, Ron Paul, Rothschild, silver, solution, sovereignty, tax, the great depression, The Secret of Oz, truth, usury, war

This is the Freedom Of Information request we put to the Bank of England back in 2011 at asking 4 simple questions

1) What lawful consideration do you claim the BoE gives up when it creates money ?
2) How then does the bank (or does the bank) claim there is a debt to the bank ?
3) What is the claim to interest then, when the bank can do no more than absorb the costs of merely publishing evidence of our promissory obligations *to each other* ?
4) How is it possible even to maintain a vital circulation without accumulating inevitably terminal sums of debt ?

Note: The end result was of course as usual “EVASION”.

You can put these questions to any bank, even peripheral banks . Try it & you will basically get the same response . They will evade answering these questions particularly the first knowing all too well if they do it will be self incriminating or admitting to theft.

Think about it — If they’re not stealing in the form of pretend loans they would simply answer the damn questions wouldn’t they? but their pathetic excuse for not answering them is that these questions are unintelligible. In the end the BoE claimed the expense they would have to forgo finding the answers to these simple questions would be too costly for them. Too costly for them alright because if they answered the questions it would end their crime of theft & they damn well know it.

All they have to do is answer the first question really, because if they can prove they give up consideration of commensurable value in the creation or any loan of money the following questions are made redundant, except question 4 of course, simply due the current escalations of debt, which they then have to explain how & why is not terminal, which we already know they cant answer, because no one on this planet can prove or demonstrate how the sum of interest is created & issued into circulation above the sum of principal that takes us back to question 1 again. In retrospect questions 2, 3 & 4 take you back to question 1, which is why its the first question, that’s hardly unintelligible.

Its really a YES or NO answer to the first question. Do you give up consideration of value in the creation of money? . Is your answer YES or NO?. If your answer is YES what consideration are you then giving up in the creation of money ? but they refuse to even do that. Unintelligible my arse — The question couldn’t be any more simpler.

We are only asking the bank the same question we would otherwise ask ourselves to identify who exactly is creating money, determining then if any loan transpires or not. So If anyone of us was asked if we give up consideration of value in the creation of money the answer would be logically YES, & if asked what consideration are we giving up — pure observation alone tells anyone with a half a brain that we are giving up our labour & production that has the only lawful consideration of commensurable value.

So if it is we who create all new money, which we have already proven to be the case for nearly 50 years already, predominately by the purchaser who issues a promissory obligation/note before publication, before any subsequent deposit — so how is it even ethically or rationally possible for the “obligor” (creator of money) to borrow what has not yet been paid & or deposited from the resulting sale?

The simple answer its not possible. To suggest we loan or borrow money from each other defies all logic & reason — putting the cart before the horse. Indicating further we are not even loaning or borrowing money from each other either, much less from a thieving bank. When the unadulterated debt is merely an obligation by the *obligor* to “pay & retire” the principal, free from exploitation or unjust intervention.

Make no mistake MPE is NOT claiming there is no debt,  simply because the only debt that transpires is the true debt we have  to each other. Therefore the argument is not to somehow get out of paying the debt altogether, but instead the intent to restore today’s falsified debts (phony loans) to their original unadulterated state where there never is any loan or borrowing.

For detailed correspondence regarding this FOI request please visit WhatDoTheyKnow. OR HERE.

Please note “whatdotheyknow” have since taken down the detailed correspondence which can only be perceived as further EVASION of the facts.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

 

(Published : July 01, 2017, last edit January 19, 2019)

 

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Pretended experts in economy

01 Saturday Jul 2017

Posted by australia4mpe in Pretended experts in economy

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

911, Australian banks, bank of England, banks, Bill Still, central bank, contract, contractual obligation, criminals, Dennis Kucinich, experts in economy, freedom, G. Edward Griffin, gold, gold standard, interest, intrinsic, mandate, math’s, mathematically perfected economy, plagiarist, promissory note, Ron Paul, Rothschild, solution, sovereignty, Stephen Zarlenga, tax, the great depression, The Secret of Oz, truth, usury, war

Some time ago I had a fellow with a doctorate in economics question why I use the word “volume”. He proceeded to then hold some authority over me because according to him today’s economics does not use volumes & because I do not have a degree like him in today’s lie of economy I have no authority on the subject, evidently because I’m using volumes apparently.

My reply was quite simple when I proceeded to ask him if today’s economics uses percentages to demonstrate rates of profit, margins of solubility or purported growth how is this not a measurement in respect to volume?

For example if you have a 25%  profit is this not telling you that 25% exceeds the volume of 100%  invested?

So if you invest $80 & get back $100 is this not a 25% gain or alternatively a $20 gain in proportion to the initial $80 investment. Therefore $80 is your 100% volume or overall outlay & $20 is your 25% gain.

Eg:  $80 = 100% ÷ 4 = $20 = 25% 

In short the percentage (%) is a scale used to measure something as a fraction comparative to associated volume.

So If you want to take down any phony economist in one question just ask them what is a volume of circulation that is neither above or below its intended representation? or in broad obscure terms otherwise taught in universities that might make some sense to these buffoons; What is a volume of circulation that is neither above or below the cost of goods & services (ie:representation).

Without giving away the answer here its simply a question of logic that extends the mathematics from one point to another.

Hint: if “C” is neither above “I” or below “D” what is “C” in proportion to “V”?

Of course its a Circulation always [_____] in Volume , or alternatively a circulation always [______] in Value in proportion to the Volume of Circulation relating to the dispositional impropriety of Inflation & Deflation in respect to represented property, which gives you the same answer of logic anyhow.

Those of you who cant immediately answer this question I suggest you read the home page or seek the answer in the menu.

I’m nonetheless still waiting for this pretended expert’s answer, which is an answer so simple it equates to the rudimentary logic of a kindergarten child putting a square peg through a square hole.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 01, 2017, last edit July 09, 2017)

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

The Growth Paradox under the ruse of banking

01 Saturday Jul 2017

Posted by australia4mpe in The Growth Paradox under the ruse of banking

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

911, Australian banks, bank of England, banks, Bill Still, central bank, coins, Constitution, contract, contractual obligation, credit, criminals, debt, deflation, Dennis Kucinich, Economic Growth, freedom, G. Edward Griffin, gold, gold standard, illuminati, inflation, interest, intrinsic, kevin rudd, liberty, mandate, math, math’s, mathematically perfected economy, money, plagiarist, promissory note, recession, Ron Paul, Rothschild, silver, tax, the great depression, The Secret of Oz, truth, usury, war

QLD finacial minister

Queensland Treasurer predicts the State will have the strongest growing economy in Australia.

How is it even rationally possible to have growth if any increase in production is entirely dedicated to service but never pay down an irreversible multiplication of artificial debt caused by the volumetric impropriety of interest?

I mean you would have to be a blithering idiot to even remotely suggest growth is attainable so long we are all paying interest.

Sure the QLD treasure (Curtis Pitt) is predicting otherwise growth because this sociopath knows all too well he is artificiality sustaining this lie of economy in Queensland by playing his part in laundering already stolen money (formerly stolen in private debt) back into circulation as an increase in state debt (public debt) to pay for the commonwealth games commencing in 2018.

Of course anyone with half a brain can see production is increasing in preparation for the commonwealth games, however what most people refuse to see including treasure Curtis Pitt who clearly failed primary school maths is nonetheless the consequential increase in state debt that is not only paying for this but its mathematically impossible to pay down regardless of any surplus , yet I ask how can this increase in production be any remote indication of growth if the value of all production including any increase in production is owed to a thief (bank) at further interest again?

Concluding you would have to village idiot to ever suggest growth is even remotely attainable under the ruse of banking. Its simply mathematically impossible so long as we are all paying the added cost of interest not only on all our personal falsified debts, but as a consequence when each & everyone of us spends money.

And where will this sociopath be in 2022-24 when this growth paradox or LIE of economy falls flat on its face in the coming second greater world wide depression when industry & commerce can no longer service the very thing he & every political betrayer omits in their unfounded preposterous assertions?

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 01, 2017, last edit July 09, 2017)

 

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

The share market paradox

01 Saturday Jul 2017

Posted by australia4mpe in The share market paradox

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

911, Australian banks, bank of England, banks, Bill Still, central bank, Constitution, contract, contractual obligation, credit, deflation, freedom, G. Edward Griffin, gold standard, math’s, mathematically perfected economy, money, plagiarist, promissory note, recession, Ron Paul, Rothschild, share market, silver, solution, sovereignty, Stephen Zarlenga, tax, the great depression, The Secret of Oz, truth, usury, war

Share markets are only ever artificially sustained by further borrowing (alleged loans) which is mathematically impossible to pay down due to the volumetric impropriety of interest (PERPETUAL DEFLATION) .

Therefore any AAA rating is entirely artificial based on any nations ability to maintain or service the ever greater escalations of falsified debt in perpetual cycles of reflation, yet never ever paying it down.

Point blank regardless of any increase in production under the ruse of banking you have no growth so long as you are all paying principal & interest out of a volume of a circulation thats only ever comprised of some remaining principal at most, not only on all your personal falsified debts (phony loans), regardless if its to purchase a home, shares or whatever, but as consequence its stealing however much interest we pay above the sum of principal inclusive, which is stealing all that much further from each & everyone of us in just spending money today.

Whats so difficult to comprehend HERE folks?

So long as you are all paying the added cost of interest in “artificial price inflation” the primary school mathematics is clearly telling us you have DEFLATION or a DECREASE IN VALUE per goods & services (per representation) by however much interest you pay out of a general circulation above the sum of principal, which is a circulation that only ever consists of some remaining principal at the very most, even upon further cycles of reflation in any increase in debt, whether its public or private, which never ever increases the remaining circulation above the sum of principal that it initially was intended to represent.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : July 01, 2017, last edit July 09, 2017)

 

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Is Quantitative Easing another slight of hand of the thief?

30 Friday Jun 2017

Posted by australia4mpe in Quantitative Easing, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

911, Australian banks, bank of England, banks, Bill Still, central bank, Constitution, contract, contractual obligation, freedom, illuminati, interest, mathematically perfected economy, plagiarist, promissory note, Quantitative Easing, recession, Ron Paul, Rothschild, silver, solution, sovereignty, Stephen Zarlenga, tax, the great depression, The Secret of Oz, truth, usury, war

To begin lets  study the bullshit in this article below that would have you irrationally believing the lie Quantitative easing (QE) creates new money, which is just a further attempt to justify non-existent inflation as inflation. If I may quote from the usury media article below.

“Policymakers also push the button on a quantitative easing programme – which will pump tens of billions of pounds of newly created money into Britain’s troubled economy.”

Article

How do we know this is bullshit, well firstly all you have to do is look at the official data in the UK (see below) regarding its money supply (M0) from March to December 2009 & you will clearly see there was no increase of £125bn in the money supply at that time, which would have otherwise near tripled the nations (M0) cash & coin monetary supply.

All that transpired in 2009 was instead a increase of 2 billion (M0) in new cash & coin that we the people create anyhow because it further represents a percentage or fraction of ledger money (M2) that includes bank deposits in circulation anyhow, plus an increase of an additional 1.1 trillion in (M2) ledger bank deposit money we create in purported loans in private debt. Keeping in mind a portion of that 1.1 trillion is money likewise earned or unearned from overseas that is nonetheless money we create in private debt in any nation.

So in ether graph (M0) & (M2) you see the increase in the UK money supply remains steady as the years pass primarily due to perpetual reflation as every increase in government debt, which  irreversibly multiplies all this falsified debt into terminal debt due to the volumetric impropriety of interest (perpetual deflation) in all private debt, hence the need for perpetual reflation in government debt that is mathematically impossible to pay down, which is a process of perpetual deflation & reflation that cant ever increase the remaining circulation above or beyond the sum of principal initially created in private debt.

UK Graph data

Secondly logic alone should tell you banks do not ever create money, much less ever loan money if they neither risk or give up consideration of value, concluding its we the people who create all new money (principal only) in private debt because we give up the only commensurable consideration of value in the only true debt, trade or transaction, however due to peoples irresponsibility they allow banks to purposely misrepresented our debts to each other in alleged loans from a thieving bank, which is a falsified debt to a thieving bank who gives up squat.

WHAT THEN IS QUANTITATIVE EASING EXACTLY?

Well, its similar in respects to a bailout. That is both of which are only ever servicing inter-banking debt or in house debt between banks, which is ultimately between banks & the central bank of any nation.

Try to Imagine a big fat central banker pouring already stolen money out of the left pocket & into the right pocket, because this is whats essentially happening where qualitative easing (QE) is bypassing the direct purchase of government debt where a bailout otherwise would not.

The only difference then is the bailout increases government debt as the money travels from one pocket to another, & QE bypasses the direct purchase of any new government debt in the sense its indirectly purchasing formerly purchased government debt from banks or other banking corporations, so the process of QE is not increasing government debt by purchasing new bonds, but instead previously purchased bonds from other banks before their maturity date, so in effect the central bank gets that money back from the taxpayer plus interest when those bonds mature.

Whichever the process BAILOUTS or QE its only ever temporally solving any outstanding inter-banking debt between banks, simply because the people can no longer service this inter-banking debt via their own personal falsified debts anymore due to interest of course, which is all owed (allegedly owed) to the central bank (mere publisher) anyhow.

Whether its a bailout or QE its never reaching industry & commerce or never reaching the people in this lie of economy today in the entire process of both.

We could almost debate if the central bank even parts with any sum of QE because its ultimately owed (allegedly) to the central bank anyway, hence the QE is just another sleight of hand of a thief, which is just a thief taking already stolen money out of one pocket & just quietly slipping it back in the other pocket, & hey presto the bankers fool see’s the big fat central banker create all this new money out of thin air (NOT),, & apparently its somehow magically increasing a monetary circulation to justify inflation that is clearly non-existent..

So the reader might ask now whats ultimately transpiring with that stolen money in the big fat central bankers pocket?

Well, with the assistance of political betrayers its perpetually laundered back into the monetary circulation as every increase in government debt or federal expenditure, perpetually reflating circulation as we the people consecutively pay principal & interest out of circulation in all private debt .

This is why the graph above shows a steady increase in the money supply (principal only) that we people initially create in private debt regardless, apposed to any dramatic jump in the money supply that possibly might otherwise justify qualitative easing pumping all this new money into circulation to further justify inflation which  is clearly non-existent, much like any phony loan to us in private debt, where a thieving bank is pretending to create new money yet again & would have you irrationally believe just by increasing the circulation by principal alone is inflationary. Which is false assumption so long as were all paying *principal+interest* out of a general circulation only ever comprised of some remaining *principal* at most.

No one on the face of this planet can prove or demonstrate how any sum of interest is created or issued into circulation above the some of principal.

Hypothetically even if QE creates new money above the sum of principal we initially create in all private debt — that 125 billion is nothing compared to the trillions (M2) we create & pay out of circulation in all private debt — stolen many, many, many times over in  perpetual cycles of deflation due to interest.

Therefore regardless if a mere 125 billion somehow magically appears in the monetary circulation as new money, WHICH IT DID NOT, not without any sale, trade or transaction to otherwise pump it into any lie of economy it cant possibly justify inflation regardless, not so long as we are all paying billions if not trillions in principal + interest out of circulation.

If any of you want more evidence look no further than the current UK national debt (perpetual reflation).

Here again I’m using logic alone & primary school mathematics to prove banks do not ever create money, not even by quantitative easing, much less can QE stimulate non-existent growth or justify non-existent inflation, not that inflation can be any rational indicator of true sustainable growth.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)


(Published : June 30, 2017, last edit July 09, 2017)

 

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Is Bitcoin the solution?

30 Friday Jun 2017

Posted by australia4mpe in bitcoin, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

911, Australian banks, bank of England, banks, Bill Still, central bank, coins, Constitution, contract, contractual obligation, credit, criminals, debt, deflation, Dennis Kucinich, G. Edward Griffin, kevin rudd, math’s, mathematically perfected economy, money, plagiarist, promissory note, recession, Ron Paul, Rothschild, silver, solution, tax, the great depression, The Secret of Oz, truth, usury, war

BITCOIN suggests to seek their wiki FAQ page for more information about   bitcoin where it defines “ stabilize ” to “ sticky economics ” which is based on what is a broad range of mere unqualified assumptions & LIES, which could not be any further away from being stable, so in other words bitCON has no means to solve inflation & deflation & nor will it.

To actually claim BitCONS have value as bitcoin suggests because they are useful & because they are scarce is  not  only admitting BitCON has unaccountable representation but likewise has a volumetric impropriety to begin with as any gold standard would or had in the past, * useful * does not qualify immutable representation nor does * scarcity *  qualify stable whatsoever.

Scarcity of money today by imposed interest on a falsified debt is the very reason why we have a irreversible multiplication of artificial debt, so be assured as soon as bitcoin starts lending, ( SEE HERE WHERE BITCON HAS BEEN GIVEN THE GO AHEAD TO OPERATE AS A BANK ) they have just stepped into the bankers shoes of terminal exploitation. Actually they already have one shoe on because they are complying with banking regulation, which is the very reason why there is an exchange of bank money to acquire Bitcoins in the first place, thus any bitcoin value is not only wholly artificial but is logically a further misrepresentation derived from a former misrepresentation — originating from the banks purposed obfuscation of our promissory obligations we have to each other.

Contrary to those advocating bitcoin merely assuming it has no connection to banking whatsoever — the connection is not only to initially purchase bitcoin with bank money, SEE HERE & HERE , but bitcoin has to likewise conform with the current banking regulation , SEE HERE .

The idea of microeconomics or competing currencies within a nation  fails at its core concept by not addressing the nation’s volume of circulation on a macro level first, & the very act of exchanging money & property with another currency subject to artificial manipulation such as today’s bank money opens up the door for one currency adversely affecting another – that may or may not otherwise have an adverse volumetric disposition.

Micro currencies competing within any nation is an epic fail of rudimentary logic & is stupid as stupid gets, simply because it fails to address how one currency & its represented property effects the volume of another currency & its represented property upon any exchange?.

In truth greed blinds most if not all people to the fact cryptocurencies are online gambling rackets much like online casinos. The only difference is you can spend your chips outside the casino at recommended retail outlets who likewise gamble at your choice of casino, & or alternatively you can simply cash your chips in at the casino & purchase whatever.

Now if the creators of bitCON think they have already addressed inflation & deflation using references from today’s LIE of economy “ sticky economics ”, more the fools who put their trust in these charlatans ignorantly believing bitCON is a economic or monetary solution.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : June 30, 2017, last edit March 02, 2018)

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Does taxation fund government expenditure?

30 Friday Jun 2017

Posted by australia4mpe in Does taxation fund government expenditure?

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

911, Australian banks, bank of England, Bill Still, central bank, coins, Constitution, contract, contractual obligation, credit, criminals, debt, deflation, Dennis Kucinich, freedom, G. Edward Griffin, illuminati, interest, intrinsic, liberty, mandate, math’s, mathematically perfected economy, money, plagiarist, promissory note, recession, Ron Paul, Rothschild, silver, solution, tax, taxation, the great depression, The Secret of Oz, usury, war

Lets be very clear all government expenditure is financed by the people in private debt, simply because it is the people who give up the only commensurable consideration of value.

Government expenditure has been always financed by the people, NOT BY TAXATION, but instead  by a process of reflation where purported representatives of the people whether its on federal, state or council levels are perpetually re-borrowing (alleged borrowing [LAUNDERING]) what has formerly been stolen & paid out of circulation in purported loans within the private sectors, only to have that same money come back again & again, over & over as an ever greater escalation in government debt, which is the very thing that finances government expenditure, apposed to the long time fallacy or barefaced lie that just keeps on telling everybody taxation otherwise does.

Taxation under banking is therefore not funding government expenditure. It never has but instead either directly or indirectly paid into the banks coffers via political extortion. Contrary AGAIN to the age old LIE that otherwise suggests taxation finances federal or government expenditure. We categorically know this is a LIE, simply because firstly logic alone should rightly tell any dummy government spending always comes before taxation, & secondly no one on the face of this planet can prove or demonstrate how the sum of interest is created or issued into circulation above the sum of principal.

Moreover & just as important nor can anyone prove or demonstrate what consideration of value the bank or mere publisher is risking or giving up to even justify their purported creation of principal, nor for that matter & just as equally important can anyone prove or demonstrate what consideration these thieves are risking or giving up in any purported loan to one of us in the private sector.

Therefore the primary school mathematics & rudimentary logic is telling anyone of sound mind that taxation has never ever funded federal expenditure under banking, when its instead entirely dedicated to service but never pay down government debt.

Its even debatable if taxation has ever worked at all financing government expenditure, other than working as a further crime of theft under the pretense of taxation funding government, which to be frank is a debate I could win with absolute certainty in the first round.

The fact alone taxation is not ever retired is the smoking gun that actually proves taxation is purposely misappropriated by political betrayers — as a means to steal & or extort even further money from the people to service a falsified debt that is mathematically impossible to pay down.

It comes as no surprise then that not one politician on the face of this planet has ever worked for or represented the people under the ruse of banking, simply because facts alone prove politicians work for & represent the very thieves who rob the people — via purported loans in all private sectors that politicians facilitate with criminal legislation, which are so called loans that neither ethically or rationally transpire in the first place. Subsequently imposing not only unjustified interest but unwarranted taxation as a further crime of theft yet again. Primarily due to the volumetric impropriety of interest (perpetual deflation) imposed an all private falsified debt.

Contrary to what you have all been led to believe since birth we the people have been the only true fiduciary issuers & creators of all new money which is only the sum of principal. Telling anyone using nothing more than primary school mathematics, logic & rudimentary deduction that taxation has never ever funded government expenditure, not ever & never will as a matter of fact.

Banks on the other hand or mere publishers of money cant even prove nor demonstrate they create the principal, much less the interest that unfortunately sets off these cycles of perpetual deflation & subsequent cycles of reflation, which is the very process that irreversibly multiplies all this falsified debt into terminal debt. Lets not forget all the other resulting crimes of injustice & theft that follow as a consequence & the very reason why I’m writing this post, such as unwarranted taxation that can only at best service but never ever pay down government debt.

At the end of the day banking is an inherent terminal process that no amount of regulation or taxation/extortion can ever solve. Without exception any or all regulation under banking can only at best temper or prolong ultimate monetary destruction so we all fall that much harder in the end.

The statement below further proves the Australian taxation department is purposely misleading the Australian tax payers. At the very top it tells you the government is allegedly spending income tax by presenting you with a graph outlining where its all spent, but just under that in all contradiction it likewise tells you the government debt has increased, only AS IF taxation for some unknown reason is not servicing that government debt.

Ask yourselves if it is true your taxation is spent on what is outlined in the graph below. The first logical question one might ask is where else is the government spending every increase in government debt if its not on what is outlined in the graph?

Secondly what is actually servicing the total government debt if income tax is otherwise spent on what is outlined in the graph. Is it just consumption/sales tax & all other public revenue servicing government debt or is income tax inclusive?

Thirdly how can the government logically spend what has not yet been collected in taxation?  Because blind Freddy can even see government spending always comes before taxation. This fact alone tells anyone of sound mind taxation can’t possibly be funding government expenditure.

In fact we have already proven so long as we are all paying *principal + interest* out of a forever deficient circulation comprised of only some remaining *principal* the funding of government by taxation is mathematically impossible.  Whereby as a matter of consequence dedicates all public revenue, including any or all taxation to service the former sum of government debt — but never actually pay down every new sum of government debt on each & every cycle of reflation in government expenditure. Evidencing a further fact politicians are instead spending every increase in government debt that is formerly stolen in private debt, apposed to just spending the resulting taxation, public revenues such as rates, vehicle registrations, license’s, traffic fines etc, which AGAIN can only at best service government debt but never ever pay it down due to interest.

In relation to the misleading document below the total government debt, including federal, state & local government (council) debt is currently at 739 billion & rising, apposed to this gross 427 figure.

Make no mistake my sorely divided countrymen the second biggest LIE next to the biggest LIE that suggests BANKS LOAN US MONEY is the further LIE that suggests TAXATION FUNDS GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE.

In short anything or anyone that preserves this monumental crime of theft & not just the lie that suggests taxation funds government expenditure, but likewise the biggest lie — that suggest we borrow or loan money from banks — is making it much, much, much worse for each & everyone of us.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)

(Published : June 30, 2017, last edit January 13, 2018)

 

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Is gold a viable solution?

30 Friday Jun 2017

Posted by australia4mpe in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

911, Australian banks, bank of England, banks, Bill Still, central bank, coins, Constitution, contract, contractual obligation, credit, criminals, debt, deflation, Dennis Kucinich, freedom, G. Edward Griffin, gold, gold standard, interest, intrinsic, math’s, plagiarist, promissory note, recession, Ron Paul, Rothschild, silver, solution, sovereignty, the great depression, The Secret of Oz, truth, usury, war

Absolutely not, simply because there is not enough volume of gold out there to equal all our labour & production, much less equal any increase in our production.

The inherent volumetric impropriety (perpetual deflation) of any finite metal such as gold acts much the same as the volumetric impropriety of interest perpetually devaluing our production & the physical gold or money itself it further represents.

Having gold as an unnecessary further representation of our labour & production yet again is utter buffoonery, considering our labour & production already has the only intrinsic value & the added volumetric impropriety of interest can only escalate terminal monetary destruction all that much faster, which is the very reason why gold is no longer used to represent our production, primarily as a means to prolong monetary destruction even further so banks can keep on stealing the value of our labour & production & not devalue the gold they have already stolen.

Considering banks do not ever create money or ever give up consideration of value in any purported loan to one of us LOGICALLY all gold that once represented money in the past has already been physically stolen by banking in falsified debts that are mathematically impossible to pay down, if not due to the inherent volumetric impropriety of gold itself its by interest or both.

Therefore even if we eradicated the crime of banking & or interest returning a gold standard or even using physical gold coin as currency is stupid as stupid gets because you are still left with perpetual, monumental deflation.

All those who believe gold can somehow hold the solution only proves to me these deranged individuals not only failed primary school mathematics but do not even know what money is, how its really created & what it truly represents, which is not a gold coin or gold bar, but instead the value of our labour & production that has the only intrinsic value all money past, present & future records, evidences & represents.

What these fools fail to conclude is its only the volume of money, regardless if the tokens of representation are in the form of fiat/paper, gold/coin/bar, coffee beans, rum, or dog shit–money ultimately has to equal our labour & production in volume. So unless you want to carry around dog shit in your pocket fiat/paper money is the only viable rational alternative .

Of course you could carry around gold coins in your pocket, however as we increase our production those coins will be getting smaller & smaller in size/weight/volume to equal any increase in production, which is not only devaluing the physical gold itself, but devaluing what that gold is supposed represent— in our labour & production.

In other words the money itself is only numbers in volume that further represents the underpinning value of our labour & production, or our hard earned, blood sweat & tears we give up to each other, which is hardly nothing or thin air, otherwise banks would not be stealing the value of our labour & production in purported loans that do not ethically or even rationally transpire in the first place .

I have literally lost count how many times I have proven to the world gold is not a viable monetary solution, it never has as a matter of verifiable mathematical fact, but unfortunately there are those out there who still insist gold is the viable solution, without proving & even demonstrating it ever has been a viable solution or ever can be a viable solution.

So the question I ask these deranged individuals is where is your mathematics? Where is your logic? How do you account for deflation?

The simple answer is you cant, because you have thrown all rudimentary logic & mathematics out the window & instead solely relying on mere conjecture, unqualified assumptions & more often barefaced lies to sell non-solution only as if it was a solution.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)


(Published : June 30, 2017, last edit July 09, 2017)

 

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Is interest free banking the solution?

30 Friday Jun 2017

Posted by australia4mpe in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

911, Australian banks, bank of England, banks, Bill Still, central bank, coins, Constitution, contract, contractual obligation, credit, criminals, debt, deflation, Dennis Kucinich, freedom, inflation, interest, INTEREST FREE BANKING, intrinsic, promissory note, recession, Ron Paul, Rothschild, silver, tax, the great depression, The Secret of Oz, truth, usury, war

To suggest banking can exist free from interest is failing to address the banks first crime of theft when a bank pretends to loan you a sum of principal in the first place.

This is where those promoting such nonsense are going critically wrong by denying the contract essentials regarding consideration of value in contract law, that otherwise proves we the people are the true creators of money, where there never was or ever will be any loan of borrowing, which of course those who promote banking (public or private) will never concede — only to preserve the crime of banking — particularly the banks first crime of theft, which allegedly loans you a sum of principal, that precipitates the further crime of theft by unwarranted interest as a result, only AS IF the bank is giving up consideration of value in the purported loan to begin with.

Logically you cant just eradicate the banks second crime of theft (interest) without eradicating the banks first crime of theft (loan), which is an *alleged loan* that does not ever transpire anyway, which is a crime of theft these pretenders want nothing more but to preserve by putting a public stamp on the exact same crime of theft & calling it a solution. All along evading the consideration question that proves banks do not ever create or even loan us money.

THE CONSIDERATION QUESTION.
The question of “Consideration of Value” is not only deadly to banks (public & private) but it acts much like a doubled edged sword. The forward swing proves banks do not ever loan us money, but the back swing ultimately proves we are the true creators of money, where there never was or ever is any loan or borrowing.

One might even conclude public banking a form of communism under the same old kleptocracy (rule by thieves).

Logically you have to eradicate the first crime of theft to eradicate by default the second crime of theft , by which a matter of consequence eradicates the criminal practice of banking altogether, therefore making any idea of “interest free banking / interest free loans ” or “debt free money” an oxymoron, regardless if the thieving bank is public or private.

Usury is not just the further imposition of interest or riba, simply because the imposition of interest precipitates from a former crime of theft in the form of a purported loan that neither ethically or rationally transpires, so if you are not addressing the fact banks do not ever loan us money in the first place how can you be rationally or ethically addressing the resulting crime of theft by unwarranted interest? Unless of course you want to preserve the banks very first crime of theft, which by default preserves the banks second crime of theft by interest, only AS IF the bank is legitimately loaning you the principal to you in the first place, which they clearly do not. Banks never have or ever will, because banks or mere publishers neither risk of give up consideration of commensurable value, not in the banks pretended creation of OUR money, not in any pretended loan, not even in any debt, trade, transaction or sale.

AGAIN : The business of banking (public or private) is not commerce, but PIRACY.

David Ardron.
Advocate / mentor, Co-founder, Co-director – Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (au)


(Published : June 30, 2017, last edit July 09, 2017)

 

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
← Older posts
Newer posts →

MPE Categories

  • HOME (click header above)
  • ONE PROBLEM (NEW)
  • ONE TRUTH (NEW)
  • ONE SOLUTION (NEW)
  • MIKES MODEL
  • THE MATHEMATICS
  • 2013 MANDATE
  • GLOSSARY OF TERMS
  • POD CASTS
  • AUSTRALIAN DEBT CLOCK
  • DICTIONARY
  • (Android & iOS)

Related Posts (NEW)

FOI request Bank of England

Banks have no poof of claim

Gross Domestic Product

Debt Securities

Origin of money

Aussie Elections

True Debt vs Falsified Debt

Surplus vs Deficit

Money vs Credit

Promise vs IOU

Money vs Receipts

Good Debt vs Bad Debt

Referendum vs Plebiscite

Determine vs Predict

Trading EQUAL production

Money laundering

Pretended experts

Fractional Reserve Banking

Economic buffoonery

MPE Cult Propaganda

The cost of a home

Supply & Demand

The Ancient Ruse

Share Markets

Bankruptcy

Boom & Bust

Global Debt

Buying local

Super theft

Inflation

Taxation

Growth

WAR

NON-SOLUTIONS (NEW)

Debt free money

Nationalizing banks

Interest free banking

Moneyless trade

Banking regulation

Gold standard

Bitcoin/Cryptocurrency

Quantitative Easing & Bailouts

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 66 other followers

Contact Admin

David Ardron

Notes from Admin

Updates & Comment etiquette

ARCHIVE

Former Posts under revision

Blog Stats

  • 59,675 hits

  • Follow Following
    • Australia for Mathematically Perfected Economy™
    • Join 66 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Australia for Mathematically Perfected Economy™
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: