Before we begin we must identify what a debt security actually is . The debt security is often referred to as debt instruments. According to mainstream academia a debt instrument is a paper or electronic *obligation* that enables the issuing party to raise funds by *promising* to repay [allegedly repay] a lender [purported lender] in accordance with terms of a contract.
Now we have established a debt instrument is a *promissory obligation* which is a *contractual obligation* we can now ask ourselves do banks create or issue a debt security & or any further representation of a debt security such as a treasury bond by asking one simple question relating to the *Contract Essentials* (contract law), which can either validate or invalidate a debt precipitates to the bank or mere publisher of money (central bank) .
The question is what consideration of commensurable value does the bank risk or give up to otherwise evidence a bank (ANY BANK) is actually creating or issuing money from these debt securities ( ie: promissory obligations).
Of course one cant just irrationally assume the bank creates money from a debt security if the bank cant prove or even demonstrate what consideration of value the bank risks or gives up from its otherwise prior legitimate possession. Logically all banks can ever do is publish a further representation (misrepresentation) of the money the real issuer is creating. Evident by who is giving up consideration of commensurable value equal to the debt to determine who the real issuer of a debt security (promissory obligation) actually is.
I ask a simple question of logic to the reader. If the bank or mere publisher can not prove or even demonstrate what consideration they either risk or give up who else can prove they give up lawful consideration of value if not ourselves the real creators of money, because its already apparent the obligor makes (creates) a promissory note by signing & therefore issuing that promissory obligation (ie: money)?
Is it not the obligor who owes an obligation to another, therefore the obligor is one who must pay on a promissory note or obligation that is legally or contractually obliged to provide a benefit or payment to another?
I ask again if a bank or mere publisher neither risks or gives up consideration of value & WE THE PEOPLE DO, predominantly the obligor & it is the obligor who actually signs the contractual obligation in a purported loan how is it even rationally or ethically possible for any bank to create money, much less loan us money if the bank neither risks or gives up consideration & does not even sign the contractual obligation?
As for security deeds, such as deed to a home is not what actually creates money & its a barefaced LIE to suggest it ever is.
The deed is not a promissory obligation or debt security that creates new money, so just because this debt security or promissory obligation is collateralized by the property it purchases does not make that promissory obligation or money itself a deed to a home. Only a bankers fool would suggest something so moronic.
Therefore the deed of a home is the rightful possession of the real creditor who gives up prior ownership of *property itself*, which is property that has *consideration of value* representing what the seller is giving up in any sale such as a home itself. Until such time that home is sold to the debtor or obligor, thus transferring deed title to the debtor or obligor for paying the real creditor in full from the outset of creating the money or issuing a promissory obligation.
Regardless if the bank is taking unlawful possession of deed resulting from any purported loan this is not to just blindly assume the money representing the debtors or obligors own present & or future production is what value the seller is giving up, much less the non-existent value any bank is purportedly giving up — absolutely not — simply because although both CREDIT & MONEY have consideration of value that value is logically separate each to their own in respect to what value the buyer & seller is giving up in that sale .
Property being the value the real creditor is giving up & the money being the value the debtor gives up. Either by actually earning money to pay the debt & or what value the obligor is formerly giving up by signing & issuing a promissory obligation that issues new money (principal only) into circulation by promising their own future production. Otherwise the thief (ie:bank) would not be even stealing the value we give to all money & property in phony loans, “X2″ due to unwarranted interest.
Moreover the security deed is not the banks rightful possession or title of ownership to begin with. If the bank cant even prove or demonstrate what consideration of value the bank is actually risking or giving up in any purported loan to otherwise evidence the banks rightful possession, repossession of title the deed is not the banks rightful possession.
Trading currencies or the practice of taking unearned gain (interest) on ” Bank Bill Swap Rates” (BBSR) isn’t creating money either, NOT EVEN CLOSE, & a barefaced LIE to ever suggest it is.
SOCIAL CONDITIONING
Society has become so conditioned people don’t think when they casually use the term “I have to go out to make some more money“,when it is really “I have to go out to earn some more money “ . Logically earning more money is not making any more new money.
This conditioning leads to a further misconception within industry & commerce with another common term “spending money makes money“ which is another false assumption, simply because its not the act of spending old money that makes new money, but instead when someone signs & issues a *promissory obligation* when a bank only ever pretends to loan that someone new money in private debt, BEFORE that new money is even spent or subsequently deposited resulting from any sale.
Often the proponents of banking will play on this common social conditioning that would have people irrationally believe when a bank spends or trades money (stolen money) the bank creates new money, which could not be any further from the truth but a barefaced lie instead, only to disguise the fact the practice of banking first steals & then launders money, either by purportedly lending, spending or trading money with the intent & means to steal even further from each & everyone of us.
CONCLUSION: Banks never have or ever will create or loan money. NOT from a security deed . NOT even from a debt security. Simply because WE DO by giving up commensurable consideration in the only debt security (promissory obligation/ contractual obligation) in private debt that actually creates all new money (principal only), regardless if the bank purposely misrepresents that debt or contract by falsifying the debt we have to each other instead to the bank itself — in a purported loan– that neither ethically or rationally transpires in the first place. Regardless if the bank has possession of the security deed or deeds to your home, which if anything can only further prove the bank is a thief.
PS: I have no problem calling all the proponents of banking liars because they cant even substantiate their barefaced lies, which is the very thing that preserves a monumental crime of theft today because no one ever questions those lies. You sociopath proponents of banking think you are all so smug pushing the lies of economy only as if its fact, but the hard fact remains none of you can actually prove or demonstrate what you are actually talking about by not only evading the consideration question, but throwing bullshit assumptions at the wall in the hope it sticks, only as if you are answering the consideration question.
I’m writing this post in response to those who might perceive MPE is a plagiarism of E.C. Riegels work, primarily due to a barrage of preposterous vindictive accusations posted, but not approved, on the home page comments.
Lets be clear before we begin Reigel like Montagne are not the first to identify interest is unjust, however I would like to emphasize the fact Mike Montagne was the first to prove & demonstrate exactly how interest irreversibly multiplies artificial debt into inherently terminal sums of artificial debt.
E.C. Riegels ” Valun Private Enterprise Money System ” is similar in one respect & only one respect alone to Mikes Common Monetary Infrastructure (CMI) where banking is eradicated.
Although money is nothing more than an accounting system Riegel irrationally conceived money had no intrinsic value, failing to even conclude what money represents has the only intrinsic value in our labour & production, but he didn’t even go near how money is actually created by the immutable representations of promissory obligations that indeed have consideration of value in our labour & production, nor did he invent MPEs 1.1.1 ratio, or even remotely identify money has to be retired equal to remaining debt & equal to remaining represented property value to solve inflation & deflation, where Riegel is assuming instead that every person is entitled to create as much money to trade without ever considering money has to be retired at the rate of consumption to solve the otherwise circulatory inflation.
Unlike Mike, Riegel didn’t even conclude its only through unexploited promissory obligations we are entitled to create money in respect to our issue worthiness & remaining consumption value of the related property, anything else is a further representation of that promissory obligation, where we are not creating money on every trade as Riegel suggests, but instead in relation to MPE on new represented property when one otherwise does not have the money to purchase unrepresented property, moreover Riegel assumes money is created by cheque even in his Vulan system that he asserts has no nationality, inferring a one world currency is the solution, failing to even account that each nation has different production rates in relation to their population, skills, natural resources etc which have to be factored in relation to a nations imports & exports or national trade.
Anyone who thinks MPE is a plagiarism of another purported solution first has to prove how that purported solution identifies the inherent faults in today’s banking system in order to solve those faults, so there is no real comparison to Riegel s Vulan system with MPE, admittedly Riegel vaguely touches upon some symptoms of the banks obfuscation, but he hasn’t even come close to what MPE articulates & solves, far from it.
Logically if a solution is taken in part or as a whole its plagiarism, yet if its taken in its entirety its evidence of a theft of intellectual property which is a copyright violation in regards to MPE. Informally mike has been advocating his MPE solution since 1968 & formally since 1979 with the proposal of MPE to the Reagan administration including Gerald Ford .
So if anyone was to assume Mike is plagiarizing E. C. Riegel’s work you have to articulate how exactly, particularly if anyone was referring to the erroneous pamphlet ” Flight From Inflation “ published posthumously after Riegel’s death by editors at the Heather Foundation in 1978 , purportedly taken from Riegel’s papers in a transcript found by the editors at the Heather Foundation, which clearly suggests this pamphlet is not entirely Riegel’s words or thoughts.
I might also add people were issuing their own money on clay tablets free from intervention as far back as 2000BC, so this concept of issuing our own money is nothing new considering we always have anyhow regardless of the banks pretended creation or issuance.
In regards to Riegel’s earlier work he neither articulates this in the true sense either, suggesting the creation of money is upon a book keeping entry, even in his Valun system he proposes the same LIE, which has never been the case at all & nor can it be the case, simply because the obligors signature upon the issuance of a promissory note or obligation logically comes before any book entry, contrary to Riegel’s assumption asserting without proof or qualification money is created upon the book entry & issued thereafter by a signature on a cheque, which is irrationally putting the cart before the horse, assuming the creation is the cheque itself, which nonetheless orders a payment of money from a bank account, or from his Valun exchange.
So where Mike has exactly plagiarized Riegel’s non-existent mathematics is yet to be proven, which begs us to question how on earth does Riegel’s *franchised Valun exchanges* even remotely resemble the nationalized CMI in MPE, & why would anyone irrationally even conceive a mere publisher can be franchised like a Mc Donald’s outlet, when the CMI in MPE is a non-profit nationalized central accounting system that replaces all banking in any nation. Why even franchise the publisher when the people are already paying its automated running costs, which would be less than a $1 per head a year, unless you wanted to add unnecessary costs in publishing further representations of our promissory obligations, which any franchise for profit can only do if we we’re stupid enough to decentralize the CMI into competing franchises by selling or leasing those franchises to private enterprise, so to irrationally suggest competing CMIs within a nation is cost saving can only be a suggestion of a halfwit, because for each franchise your not only increasing the cost, but multiplying the overall cost by having many franchises for profit, when one centralized non- profit CMI can instead provide the exact same service for everyone for less, holding the one CMI accountable instead of opening up the door for exploitation with a chain of CMI franchises in a nation, which is stupid as stupid gets considering the CMI in MPE is nothing more than a electronically automated centralized accounting system run at cost only, & if you wanted cash ATMs are at your disposal.
Concluding Riegel, nor any other money reformist for that matter has ever proven the inherent fault is the very interest we the people pay on our personal but falsified debts, failing to not only prove interest irreversibly multiplies artificial debt to always service the former sum of artificial debt, yet can never ever pay down any subsequent new sum of artificial debt in perpetual cycles of reflation, but failing all along to even identify the presumed inflation is instead always reflation, which reflation is not even inflationary in respects to any non-existent increase of circulation above the sum of principal the people initially create & purport to borrow in the first place, but likewise failing to even identify interest is the primary cause of price inflation to steal all that much further from us in perpetual cycles of DEFLATION, that’s paid out of a forever deficient volume of circulation on our personal falsified debt’s.
Of course Riegel identifies interest is unjustified, so does the bible, but nowhere in Riegel’s papers did he ever prove or demonstrate how interest irreversibly multiplies artificial debt into terminal sums of artificial debt, so If the truth was ever told no one other than Mike Montagne has proven interest is the inherent terminal fault, & to suggest otherwise can only prove one hasn’t the intellectual capacity to study either Mikes or Riegel’s work to identify anything remotely substantial that suggests Mike has plagiarized Riegel’s Vulan proposal, except possibly the eradication of banking, however this is where any rational suggestion of plagiarism begins & ends, because the conflicting differences are so blatantly obvious to a point of almost polar opposites one would have to be a village idiot to even remotely suggest MPE is a plagiarism of Riegel’s work, when Riegels proposal like all other monetary reform proposals have clearly failed the second grade maths to even remotely prove interest is the terminal fault by irrationally suggesting non-existent inflation is instead inflation, yet all along its mathematically impossible to ever have inflation so long as your all paying *principal + interest* out of a volume of circulation only ever consisting of some remaining *principal* at most, & any interest you all pay above the sum of principal that artificially inflates prices can only ever be stealing all that much further out of a volume of circulation in a permanent state of persistent DEFLATION by interest, regardless of any reflation (not inflation) that irreversibly multiplies artificial debt.
This post is addressing the Anthony Migchels Cult propaganda about MPE atrealcurrencies.
According to wikipedia a cult is the sociological classifications of religious movements, a cult is a religious or social group with socially deviant or novel beliefs and practices..
Religion:
A religion is an organized collection of beliefs, cultural systems, and world views that relate humanity to an order of existence
Belief:
Belief is a mental representation, treated in various academic disciplines, especially philosophy and psychology, of a sentient being’s attitude toward the likelihood or truth of something.
Social Group:
A social group within social sciences has been defined as two or more people who interact with one another, share similar characteristics, and collectively have a sense of unity.
Socially Deviant:
In sociology, deviance describes an action or behavior that violates social norms, including a formally enacted rule (e.g., crime),as well as informal violations of social norms (e.g., rejecting folkways and mores). It is the purview of sociologists, psychologists, psychiatrists, and criminologists to study how these norms are created, how they change over time and how they are enforced.
Novel:
Novelty (derived from Latin word novus for “new”) is the quality of being new, or following from that, of being striking, original or unusual.[1] Novelty may be the shared experience of a new cultural phenomenon or the subjective perception of an individual.
So one might ask now is MPE a Cult?
Q: Might MPE be defined as a religion? A: Possibly Yes.
Q: Might MPE be defined as a belief? A: Possibly Yes.
Q: Might MPE be defined a Social Group? A: Possibly Yes.
Q: Might MPE be defined as socially defiant? A: Technically NO, MPE is in fact not in deviance of an enacted rule based on formal agreement that would otherwise be termed a violation, simply because no where in history has banking ever formerly been assented by the people, so there has been no formal agreement that would otherwise stipulate a violation or deviance of a presumed norm, or an enacted rule, bereft of any formal proofs that has just instead been imposed as an assumption. (eg: bank loans). On the contrary MPE is far from informal when it formally proves & demonstrates a particular presumed norm, purported agreement or enacted rule is based on a LIE.
Q: Might MPE be defined as Novel? A: Possibly Yes.
The next question I guess is Banking, or any purported solution that preserves the crime of banking a cult.
Q: Might banking be defined as a Religion? A: Possibly Yes.
Q: Might banking be defined as a belief? A: Possibly Yes.
Q: Might banking be defined as a Social Group? A: Possibly Yes.
Q: Might banking be defined as socially defiant? A: Absolutely YES, banking violates the social norms by pretending to loan money, including a formally enacted rule (e.g: the crime of theft), as well as informal violations of social norms that presumes banks loan money, bereft of any formal proof or qualification.
Q: Might Banking be defined as Novel? A: Possibly Yes.
CONCLUSION:
I put to the reader, according to wikipedia what belief that only two people are in agreement is not a religion today, or what might we just assume is a cult that’s socially defiant?
Keeping in mind MPE strictly upholds the formally enacted rule or law that stipulates stealing is a crime of theft without compromise, contradiction or any equivocation. Therefore MPE in fact does not even qualify as a cult by definition, regardless of informal violations of the social norm that suggests banks do create & or loan us money without a shred of evidence that otherwise proves they actually do.
Have any of you ever considered the assumption that just asserts banks loan us money is a cult belief in itself, bereft of any formal proof or qualification?
Could this possibly mean those who propagate the idea MPE is a cult are calling the kettle black & it is they who are banking cultists who want nothing more than to preserve a monumental crime of theft for their own personal gain, fame or glory. Particularly the banks first crime pretending to loan a sum of principal by irrationally denying all along banks not only steal a sum of principal in a pretended loan, but any interest we pay above the sum of principal is in fact stealing all that much further from us when each & everyone of us spends money today, where artificial price inflation is in fact not caused by circulatory inflation at all, but instead the very interest we all pay on our personal falsified debts, which can only ever give people (banking cults) the illusion that just assumes increasing prices means increasing value or purported growth.
So why did Anthony Migchels begin all this Cult nonsense about MPE?
Is it because MPE advocates have already exposed him for his “Mutual Credit “ proposal after years of openly plagiarizing MPE. Stealing from the MPE thesis only in part to sell the lie to his readers that suggests a mere publisher in his “Mutual Credit “ scam can create & loan us money that MPE itself disproves. In retaliation as a result of being held accountable for his deception Anthony has just propagated further lies on the internet suggesting MPE is cult to point everyone away from the one & only solution.
Does Anthony not want to preserve the banks first crime of theft, or be it preserve the purposed obfuscation of our promissory obligations by denying us the right to issue a promissory obligation to each other free from the very crime he wants to preserve in his “Mutual Credit “ proposal that uses words such as “repay’ ” loan” & “borrowing” definitive to theft?
Is Anthony Migchels not a Banking Cultist himself & one of many cult leaders out there today who want nothing more but to preserve the very crime MPE exposes?
QUOTE
In regard to Mathematically Perfected Economy, a highly advanced Mutual Credit system, 0% interest rates will lead to a demand for credit that is greater than the economy can handle: it would create so much structural demand in the economy that there would simply not be enough productive capacity in society to meet it and prices would start to rise. Asset bubbles are to be expected, both in commodities and real estate. A vicious circle of growing asset prices and growing demand would seem to guarantee this. END QUOTE
Firstly MPE is not a mutual credit system, far from it as matter of fact. Anthony is just writing this to disguise the fact he has been plagiarizing MPE, & secondly to suggest Zero interest in MPE will lead to higher demand of money (alleged credit) is quite frankly an oxymoron, considering eradicating interest eradicates the higher demand of money to otherwise pay principal + interest out of a circulation comprised of only principal. Therefore to go on to conclude low production wont meet a greater demand for money is another oxymoron to irrationally justify the LIE that suggests MPE is susceptible to asset bubbles.
If anyone was to ever look at MPEs mathematics — regardless if production is up or down the represented production is always equal to the remaining circulation & remaining debt– where there simply is no inflation or deflation, much less asset bubbles.
Sure If the theory of supply & demand stands correct as a determining factor in price only after banking/interest is eradicated that currently far surpasses any increase or decrease in price possibly caused by supply & demand — I would nonetheless define price fluctuations caused supply & demand *natural price inflation & deflation* which are often restricted to one particular product apposed to all production & for so long as the supply of that product remains overabundant or scarce in relation to its demand.
However under a Mathematically Perfected Economy™ in a true free enterprise market, free from the current artificial manipulation of the cost or value of all money & property — or any mutual credit scams pretending to loan us money — if a product supply actually meets demand we can further determine the price of that product cant possibly be subject to inflation or deflation. Neither natural price inflation & deflation possibly caused by supply & demand of a *product*, not even artificial price inflation caused by the added cost of interest, nor for that matter circulatory inflation & deflation either. That’s if anyone was to ever look at MPEs mathematics.
In all seriousness Anthony wouldn’t know what is sovereign even if it jumped up & bit him on the nose. The only reason why Anthony evades the mathematics that categorically proves him incorrect is because if he didn’t & likewise stole the math’s along with just about everything else he has stolen from MPE it would be all too clear to everyone he has been plagiarizing MPE all along to preserve the crime of banking in his mutual credit scam — that nonetheless steals the principal in a phony loan that should be rightly retired, not re-payed, loaned or borrowed, because we the people (obligor) already create the sum of principal before any deposit or book entry to subsequently pay the debt on the sale trade or transaction..
The logical question begs to be asked ; How can banks create money if they neither risk or give up consideration from their otherwise prior legitimate possession? They simply dont. How can banks create money via fractional banking on ZERO DEPOSIT? They dont. This likewise defies the whole assumption that suggests banks create money from a fraction of deposits, simply because there is no deposit to begin with to apply faction banking. How can the real creditor giving up property in exchange for money rationally loan what has not yet been paid? They dont , never have, which proves we have never borrowed from other peoples deposits in the bank either. Banks have no reserves other than what they’re stealing & laundering out of monetary circulation via purported loans in private debt — that is laundered back as every increase in government debt to perpetually reflate circulation.
I invite the reader to read an in depth discussion I had with Anthony Migchels — not only disproving everything he asserts in his MPE cult propaganda before he even published it, but providing further evidence with ” before & after screen shots” of his website proving he has purposely edited whole paragraphs out of my comments that were disproving his assumptions, only to inform his readers after the edit I’m somehow brainwashed by a cult with what I can & have already proven on countless occasions using nothing more than second grade mathematics & the rudimentary logic of a kindergarten child.
Please by all means I invite anyone reading this post to read on HERE where I expose this charlatan for who he really is. I have nothing to hide.
I think this is important enough to publish a short post in relation to those who raise false assertions that gold consistently represents value over time using the purchase of a suit as an example , contrary to these unqualified assertions a suit cost nearly 6 ounces of gold back in 1864, where we could of purchased almost 10 suits for 1 ounce of gold at its all-time high in 2011.
As you will see below, calculating for the 2011 all-time high (as well) demonstrates an even more pronounced mis-representation of historic prices by 57-fold.
Click the image to enlarge
Original Source : mike montagne founder of PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™, original (1968) architect of mathematically perfected economy™, and principal author of the global amendment for mathematically perfected economy and absolute consensual representation™(C) Copyright 2014 by mike montagne and PFMPE™.
To be further informed about the adverse dispositions of a gold standard see my other blog post ” Why a gold standard cant work “
The following is a reply I left on a blog ” thereisnodebt ” who is not only advocating MPE, but the administrator of that blog appears to be that impressed with my words in relation to the very title of his blog ( which is the very reason why I wrote what I did ) he made a separate post relaying my reply to his readers , nevertheless I think its worth re-posting here once again on my blog & I thank the admin for his due diligence.
Gday
It is true there is no debt owed to any bank, however this is not to infer there is no debt we have between ourselves for this otherwise unexploited debt is merely an exchange of our labour & production, redeeming money for property, where there are no loans or borrowing.
The key to comprehending true debt is to know what money actually is, what it truly represents & how its truly created. Money is therefore a debt instrument, not a debt itself, simply because the exchange or the act of redeeming money for property & or services is the only true debt, money is therefore a record of entitlement that one may receive on the exchange or trans/action that merely evidences what value we have given up to each other, thereafter upon fulfillment of a debt or trans/action money is most certainly not a debt but a record of earned entitlement that can be spent elsewhere in the course of redeeming another’s production & finally money is created by our promissory obligations we have to each other, which is only a promise to pay an otherwise *unexploited obligation*, with one’s own *labour and production*, for what one consumes of another’s *labour and production*… where again, there are no loans, no borrowing, & only as a result, likewise is there no interest.
It is true there has never been any lending or borrowing since the conception of banking so why would you or I propose anything else but to rectify today’s falsified debt ( falsified debt = theft ) that merely pretends to loan money, into what a debt aught to rightly be?
Most people fail to even comprehend the only real intrinsic value is what money actually represents, evidences & records upon the exchange, promissory obligation ( money creation ) inclusive, that’s in short the value of the labour & production we give up to each other, which is logically a principal debt where there are no loans or borrowing.
However I must stress, ever since the conception of banking, all banks, no exceptions, have falsified this otherwise unexploited debt to themselves by unjust intervention on the exchange, contract / promissory obligation, pretending ,then, to risk or give up value of their own in the exchange, contract / promissory obligation. either in banks publication, purported creation of money, or any purported loan the bank may impose on one of us as a result.
So to conclude what I have written here is to not infer there is no debt because there actually is a debt between ourselves, & to deny this debt is to deny a theft due to the banks unjust intervention or purposed obfuscation of our promissory obligations we have to each other, which in turn allows banks / money changers to steal the true value of what is given up in the otherwise unexploited debt ” X2 ” because of unwarranted interest only as if the bank risked or gave up consideration of value of their own in the exchange, so it would be even incorrect to assume one is not paying interest if they haven’t a falsified debt or purported loan from a bank simply because all the principal & interest all industry & commerce pays to banks is logically passed on to the consumer in the resulting price of goods & services, thus the added cost of interest above the initial cost of principal is the very cause of most if not all price inflation today, artificial in nature, since the very conception of banking, giving one only the illusion rising prices means rising value when the true value of all money & property or the value of our labour & production we give up to each other in any exchange or trans/action is being stolen by banking only to be borrowed back as perpetual re-inflation or irreversible multiplications of artificial debt, federal /state debt, so its physically possible for at least some of us to earn principal & interest out of a circulation consisting of some remaining principal at most to actually service the former sum of artificial debt, until such time, upon terminal cycles of dispossession everyone will be dispossessed of all their property & wealth one by one in the very end, & believe it or not all this is simply done by a bank pretending to loan value it neither risks or gives up in any exchange or in an otherwise unexploited debt.
I hope after reading this some of you might want to read my other blog post ” Refuting , Paul Grignon author of Money as Debt ” where its clear Paul wants preserve the LIE we not only borrow money from ” faux creditors” EG: BANKS , but likewise proposing the same crime of theft or further obfuscation of our promissory obligations ( the banks first crime ) in his purported solution, which is nothing but a plagiarism & distortion of MPE in an attempt to preserve exploitation , or the LIE we borrow money from a purported creditor, apposed to any true creditor who most certainly does not lend money , but rather paid in full for giving up commensurable value resulting from the outset of an obligor’s promissory obligation ( money creation )
What is MPEs 1.1.1 ratio ?
1: All money created into circulation is equal or no more than
1: Remaining value of represented property that’s equal or no more than
1: Remaining obligation that’s rightfully retired at the rate of our consumption
What is the relationship in regards to the Gospels of the bible?
1: (Creation) Spirit of GOD or seed.
1: (remaining value) Maintaining growth in Gods tree through the seasons of soul spirit baring adolescent fruit.
1: (remaining obligation) Maturity of the tree acquiring the spirit of Christ which bares mature fruit, repeating these cycles every season until the tree is no more & returns to the earth it was originally germinated or conceived.
Keeping in mind nothing on this earth physically lasts forever including fruit that has a shelf life & with each bite we are consuming its value that can only give further credence to MPE which conforms exactly to the laws & principles of nature & life which are: balance, equilibrium, homeostasis, synergy, symbiosis, abundance, evolution, expansion, metamorphosis & FREE WILL. As in nature, so in MPE: simple, holographic, mathematically perfect & reciprocal.
Indeed God is an eternal spirit who belongs to each & every one of us , God has no gender but a seed of all life as we should rightly know it ” GOD SPIRIT “, & thus the individual soul having the spirit of God is the beginning or adolescent growth & of course the Christ spirit of God through the soul of man is upon mature growth of God Spirit & this is the true trinity in the spirit of God plain & simple , not any false representation of god, gods or goddesses in the flesh.
I’m absolutely blown away with this stroke of revelation with the 1.1.1 ratio in contrast with not only the trinity of God spirit within us (well some of us) but the tree of life of all things , this cant be just a coincidence.
THE TRUE SIGN OF PEACE
As a child I was brought up as a Christian & the teachings of the bible was on the most part contradictory ,obscure & confusing ,but of recent I have been revisiting my teachings of the bible in an attempt to make sense of it all & to my conclusion after much soul searching I have concluded the Bible has been greatly obfuscated to make something appear to be true when it is indeed not, so upon using rational logic & much contemplation in methodical reasoning of deduction, observing all information new & old I have concluded all sexual connotation in relation to the one & only God is derived from the masonic Jew / scribe pharisee obfuscations of the Gospels within the bible , which are pertaining to false Gods such as king , Lord, father, son, sun, EL, Falice, Obelisk, bulls , golden calf’s, & mother , Isis, phallus ,yonic, vagi etc, all false representations or purposed misrepresentations of God & who do you think is possibly responsible for these misrepresentations today? see the video below .
The purported father, son & holy spirit/ghost pertaining to the holy trinity of God is essentially a purposed misrepresentation or lie so one is in turn worshiping false gods, not only in the flesh, but possibly the idol worship of banking itself for hundreds if not thousands of years now, which is in my opinion the one world religion of Anti-christ, whom all on the most part partake & practice in today, & yes, this even applies to self proclaimed atheists, nevertheless imposed on the world for well over a millennia now.
Matthew 23:9And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.
God is a spirit who has no gender & Jesus was born of the flesh had the spirit of Christ within his temple of God, indeed Jesus is not returning in the flesh himself, but rather it is Christ Spirit who is returning within our temple of God through the soul as it was for Jesus .See the parable of the talents
John 6:63 It is the [Christ] spirit that quickeneth [quickening /born again]; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I [Jesus] speak unto you, they are [Christ] spirit , and they are life[eternal life].
The soul, or image of God spirit / seed is of course man or woman in the flesh, which is the very conduit for the spirit of God to manifest into Christ spirit , keeping in mind man is only a copy or image of God spirit further represented in the flesh, therefore the soul is most definitely a part of the trinity for if there was no soul there is no path way for any growth of spirit & soul.
All one has to do is personally address the beast within each & every one of us & choose between good or evil / Christ or Anti-christ, however those who seek the external Christ or Anti-christ without truly addressing what is within first will indeed remain everlasting blind in self condemnation.
Romans 8:9 – But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.
John 16:13 – Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth [Christ Spirit], is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he [Christ Spirit] shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever shall hear, shall he [Christ Spirit] speak: and he [Christ Spirit] will shew you things to come
John 14:17 – [Even] the Spirit of truth [Christ Spirit]; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth not, neither knoweth: but ye know ; for [Christ Spirit] dwelleth with you, shall be in you.
Money is indeed the clue to ones salvation here if one truly follows it all the way back to not only its conception creation but its very origin in time , beware of false profits who pretend to expose this information often in self contradiction using then unqualified assumption or just hear say of others without any formal proof or evidence.
Jesus didn’t come to bring peace but a sword , upon asking the right questions we find the sword of an irrefutable truth & one acquires self immunity, unity on only one proof of solution therefore is the only thing that will manifest heaven in righteousness on earth, once found & to deny this truth one is indeed condemning ones own self , many have already done so out of fear of self condemnation , fearing the act of a choice to take that extra step further to know more, in turn truly judging ones own actions or inaction’s deep down for God merely passes this Judgment, apposed to just believing more in unqualified ignorance & superficial hear say.
Therefore we judge ourselves upon the question at the end of the day because we cant lie to ourselves deep down, regardless what the ego says in defense God or Christ merely passes that judgment whether its Guilty or Not Guilty.
Genesis 4:9 And God said unto Cain, Where is Abel your brother? And he said, I know not: Am I my brother’s keeper?
So the question I ask does anyone reading this serve mammon in all contradiction & hypocrisy? , if not why are you not turning over the tables of the money changers & not turning over the chairs of those who do serve mammon sitting idle doing nothing but participating in the crime of banking?
Christ does not come to bring peace, but a sword of truth that hurts like a thorn at first; but in the end it blossoms like a rose.
When one is truly mature in Christ spirit one not only renounces all false gods & subsequent slave master titles, one who is categorically in Christ Spirit knows God spirit is NOT divided, or divine at all, for it is mankind who is the divine, having the choice between good or bad, only when the grape falls away from the vine the seed becomes divined, likewise one knows ( not believes ) we are ” our ” seed/God is indeed one & the same , not in the flesh, ( mankind is not God ) but in the ONE spirit of God within ( we are not individual spirits but individual souls ) , not pretending to be above God spirit , but one & the same equal in the trinity, God , soul , Christ the transitional spirit of God , through the Soul, thus born again into Christ Spirit , for it was the spirit of Christ who was talking the parables Jesus spoke, & not Jesus alone.
John 1: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Upon further revelation we might ask ourselves what does this WORD of God actually mean, keeping in mind a promise is a unilateral agreement where a covenant is a bilateral agreement, so of course in the beginning the *intent* was a promise, which created what was once possibly good.
Indeed we can conclude, the spirit of God, through an explicit *intent* created man & wo/man as an image of God spirit, or creating a further representation of God spirit but yet an image of God spirit in the flesh, whereby Gods spirit through the soul of man can possibly grow & therefore mature, opposed to a lost soul possibly stunting any true growth ,worshiping false Gods ( EG; Father, Mother, Son , santa claus etc ) or even waiting for a prophet from the distant past to return in the flesh himself, doing then absolutely nothing but worshiping false Gods in the meantime, waiting to be saved by anyone else but themselves, failing then to truly address what is within first.
One might then ask oneself has Gods original promise been purposely misrepresented in the same manner banks purposely misrepresent our promissory obligations to each other?
One might then beg to question has the bible or various other religious text’s over time been likewise purposely misrepresented in a mere attempt to deter or prevent man kind from ever truly maturing into the perfection of Christ spirit?
We might then further conclude from the outset of a promise, or the result of the unilateral WORD of God Spirit makes man a further representation & the very evidence of this original promise, one & the same, so one might then consider the money banks therefore publish may likewise be a further representation & the very evidence of our very own promise’s to each other, also one & the same, however since the conception of banking it’s been quite clear any further representation published by a bank is of course a purposed obfuscation or purposed misrepresentation of our promises to each other & quite possibly in the same process misrepresenting Gods original promise to mankind, imposing then a falsified debt by an unjust intervention on another’s promise , pretending to loan something of value the bank neither risks or gives up, essentially stealing the true value we the people give up to each other in an principal debt or a mere transaction, where there otherwise are no loans or borrowing if there was no such intervention , where a sleight of hand by a thief for well over a millennia now has been merely pretending to be the true creditor, pretending then to be the true creator, in turn quite possibly pretending to be God (false god) if you will, but yet again this unjust intervention by a thief, bank, mere publisher or corporate entity is giving up nothing of true value itself.
Some may ask, if man is the image of God spirit or further representation of a promise we might then liken man to money itself , but on the contrary we must remind ourselves money itself has no value but merely further represents the true value of a former promise which is what value we give up to each other in any exchange, so man is most definitely NOT the money, nor can anyone put a price or value on any human life, not even in any so called alleged trust fund for that matter, rather man, & or money is merely the record of what has been given up, which is thereafter the very evidence of just entitlement that’s not even a debt at all at this stage but entitlement of just reward, thus any further representation is not a debt, not until that record of entitlement is used again in redemption of like value or in a further exchange of just entitlement which may also include like value of justifiable earned gain or profit.
So Gods promise to mankind, or Gods WORD may well be the record & the very evidence of this is mankind’s entitlement where there are NO LOANS, NO BORROWING, much the same is our otherwise unexploited promissory obligations would be to each other, which is likewise a record & evidence of entitlement, where there are NO LOANS, NO BORROWING & again any true value can only be our labour & production we actually give up to each other, regardless of any misrepresentation or purposed obfuscation of a promise that irrationally claims otherwise.
Irrationally placing a price or value on our physical huE/man body’s that only God the creator has full dominion & redemption from our very first breath to our very last is most certainly not the rightful possession of anyone else to give or take away, not even to buy or on sell, not to be enslaved or misrepresented by any dictator, not by any political betrayer or representative government & most certainly not the rightful possession of any thieving bank, false god, anti-christ entity who is merely pretending to be the true creditor in turn pretending to be the true creator of which was once originally intended to be good, only so those who willfully partake in a purposed misrepresentation of what was once good is taking a share in mammon at the dire expense or unwarranted dispossession of another, & the very consequence of these actions is everyone being dispossessed of all their property & wealth one by one in the very end , keeping in mind willful participation in banking exploitation only to remain silent in utter evasion & refusing then to fully address the root cause of all exploitation today is indeed willfully giving up all rights as a human being, simply because all rights are derived from property rights, which includes such property as your human body, soul or temple of God, foremost given up & still given up today through the original promise, but in return for what one may ask?.
Well, what is given in return is humanity maintaining the very integrity of the original promise through our promises to each other, much like the true creditor that gives up property today who should rightfully uphold just reward received, or given up in an exchange resulting from a promise, which mankind has failed miserably to uphold, not even in any true sense of the word sovereign I might add & what responsibilities actually come with true sovereignty, particularly regarding theft & partaking in theft in a complete & utter contradiction of not only Gods law but mans law.
Corinthians 7:1 Having therefore these promises, dearly beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and ” soul ” [ not spirit, for GOD is neither filth nor of the flesh ], perfecting holiness in the ” awe ” of God. [ not in fear, for you cant fear what you LOVE ]
It is a fact true sovereignty cant be taken by force or stolen, however this is not to infer true sovereignty cant be given up by the souls own free will, rejecting then what is GOOD faith from within , or possibly rejecting the true spirit of GOD within ,thus instead serving mammon , ignorantly then giving up any true sovereignty, either through an imposed deception, & or in willful blind ignorance knowing deep down one is all too well taking unearned gain at the unwarranted expense of another through no real fault of that other, thus failing to truly address the very root cause of most if not all exploitation on this planet past & present .
For over 45 years now mankind’s only true salvation is an irrefutable proof of solution, or sword of truth that most in fact totally ignore & evade, where one has a choice either to remain silent, ignorantly attack out of pure fear of reality, or embrace this truth with all sincerity & learning how to obtain not only self immunity but eventual imm/unity for all, on one, & only one proof of solution, doing then what can only be considered ethically & morally right.
In all seriousness to choose any other path but MPE is indeed nothing but a choice of self condemnation & ultimate destruction not only for the individual soul, but as a result the destruction for all those whom one might possibly love, so in the end, which is NOW , is our choice as individuals to either stand up uniting on one solution & be counted on a whole, or face the dire consequences of willful evasion, willful division, irrational contradiction, or purposed inaction’s that can only lead to the ultimate dismantling & complete destruction of once was created with the explicit intent of good faith , & YES, I’m referring to the destruction of the original promise by God spirit & as a result our promises to each other & quite possibly the destruction of what comes with this original promise or word which is the very seed of life.
I have concluded the teachings of the bible is nothing but metaphoric story, or Journey of God spirit through the soul of man that one may learn further from if one has the eyes to see & ears to hear, however the bible appears to be purposely obfuscated having many metaphoric references to say the least for those who lack GOOD faith or GOD spirit within the soul , but sadly the metaphors are often contradictory by default to the true or original teaching behind the bible, thus keeping grown adults in the dark unfortunately , for example Jesus healing the sick was healing a sick soul that was rejecting God/Christ spirit, apposed to necessarily healing someone on the exterior or in the flesh as such, however this is not to suggest or infer there wasn’t a wise prophet we all commonly refer to as Jesus, who quite possibly walked the earth long ago , possibly born into Christ spirit at birth, well, this may have been the observation of others close to Jesus at that time who perceived what Jesus did & said was always, or on the most part ethically & morally right , beginning at a very young age, possibly with above average intelligence.
Although I admit I’m not a perfect man & still learning, but what I know is these words are not entirely my own, but quite possibly the words of God spirit , possibly the spirit of Christ may well be even relaying this information through my soul so those who were once blind may see what was once hidden.
John 16:13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth *Christ Spirit * [ NOT THE HOLY SPIRIT ], is come, he *Christ Spirit * will guide you into all truth: *for he shall not speak of himself* [ FOR HE HIMSELF IS NOT HE OF THE FLESH ]; but whatsoever he *the spirit of Christ* shall hear, that shall he *the spirit of Christ * speak : and he will shew you things to come.
Hebrews 4:12For the word of God [is] quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and [is] a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.
HERE IS THE TRUTH THAT WILL SET YOU FREE.
There is only one truth that shall set the world free & the sooner you all come to terms with the reality *banks (modern day money changers) don’t ever create or loan money* the sooner you will come to terms with the fact you’re all robbing each other on the sale, trade or transaction of our production, only to pay most of which (principal + interest) to an even bigger thief (ie: bank) .
None of you would be even earning a profit today if wasn’t for perpetual reflation or further borrowing (alleged borrowing /purported loans that don’t even transpire) that irreversibly multiplies all this falsified debt both public & private into terminal debt, due to the volumetric impropriety of interest (perpetual deflation) we formerly pay out of circulation above the sum of principal in all private debt (phony loans), that steals all that much further from each & everyone of us when we spend money today, where industry & commerce is passing the added cost of interest onto the consumer in the resulting price of goods & services, plus earned profit of course which is nonetheless stolen regardless when that profit is subsequently spent on whatever.
As is the ruse of the money changer likewise the ruse of banking is all quite simple really, because it plays on your own self centered greed & desires, which blinds you to the fact there is hidden hand or thief intervening on the sale trade or transaction, essentially stealing the value of the sale when you simply spend money, & its only your own self centered greed & desire that blinds you all to whats really transpiring when you spend money today.
You all see what you receive on the sale (eg: new car, home, new mobile phone etc) , you’re all happy happy right?, but you all fail to see the value of what you all give up & receive from each other on that sale is stolen many, many, many times a hundred, thousandfold over due to unjustified interest on purported loans that don’t ethically or even rationally transpire in the first place, & of course again this ruse is only ever artificially sustained by further borrowing (alleged borrowing/phony loans) that perpetually reflates a forever deficient circulation with irreversible multiplications of falsified debt, without ever increasing the remaining volume of circulation above or beyond the principal representation we initially create as new money (principal only) in all private debt.
Public debt, however, is just reflating circulation with already stolen money, formerly stolen in all private debt & then laundered back into circulation by political betrayers as every increase in public debt, making any or all taxation under banking a further crime of theft yet again to service but never ever pay down public debt, until such time of course in the coming second greater depression when industry & commerce can no longer service the ever greater escalations of falsified debt, both public & private.
Who am not only writing this in Christ spirit but an expert in a mathematically perfected economy which you don’t have by the way, & never will so long as you’re all robbing each other only to pay it all to an even bigger thief.
Its only when you all openly admit guilt & take some self responsibility for your own actions is when we can unite & actually fix this lie we all call an economy today, NOT BEFORE & we can finally govern ourselves united, free from exploitation, without the unjust intervention of thieving banks, or any regulation imposed by politicians, phony economists or bureaucrats who clearly failed primary school mathematics.
I am David acting in my own God given sovereign rite, leading myself by example only, so others may learn from the teachings of my heart & likewise lead themselves teaching others to do the same, following none other but the GOOD faith in ones very own heart & soul, always endeavoring doing then what is ethically & morally right, regardless of belief, religion, race or creed.
Please note this is my own personal reflection I’m NOW sharing with the world & it may not necessarily be the opinion of all other MPE advocates.
King James bible, Matthew 25:14-30, Jesus parable.
14 For the kingdom of heaven is as a man traveling into a far country, who called his own servants, and delivered unto them his goods.
15 And unto one he gave five talents, to another two, and to another one; to every man according to his several ability; and straightway took his journey.
16 Then he that had received the five talents went and traded with the same, and made them other five talents.
17 And likewise he that had received two, he also gained other two.
18 But he that had received one went and digged in the earth, and hid his lord’s money.
19 After a long time the lord of those servants cometh, and reckoneth with them.
20 And so he that had received five talents came and brought other five talents, saying, Lord, thou deliveredst unto me five talents: behold, I have gained beside them five talents more.
21 His lord said unto him, Well done, thou good and faithful servant: thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord.
22 He also that had received two talents came and said, Lord, thou deliveredst unto me two talents: behold, I have gained two other talents beside them.
23 His lord said unto him, Well done, good and faithful servant; thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord.
24 Then he which had received the one talent came and said, Lord, I knew thee that thou art an hard man, reaping where thou hast not sown, and gathering where thou hast not strawed:
25 And I was afraid, and went and hid thy talent in the earth: lo, there thou hast that is thine.
26 His lord answered and said unto him, Thou wicked and slothful servant, thou knewest that I reap where I sowed not, and gather where I have not strawed:
27 Thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should have received mine own with usury.
28 Take therefore the talent from him, and give it unto him which hath ten talents.
29 For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath.
30 And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
*CONCLUSION*
The servant who returned with one talent told his master he was afraid to do what is ethically & morally wrong by reaping where thou hast NOT sown, and gathering where thou hast NOT strawed: which is essentially saying he is afraid of stealing or taking unearned profit.
His Master admitted he himself was a thief by saying in reply, thou knewest that I reap where I sowed NOT, and gather where I have NOT strawed, so how can stealing possibly be like the kingdom of heaven ?
Matthew 13:24 Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which *sowed good seed* in his field.
And reinforcing this admission of guilt by mocking his servant by suggesting he should have put his masters money to the money exchangers & therefore his master should have received one talent plus interest or usury upon return, which was essentially mocking his servant for not stealing or playing the part of a money changer,
Matthew 13:32 Which indeed is the*least of all seeds*: but when it is grown, it is the greatest among herbs, and becometh a tree, so that the birds of the air come and lodge in the branches thereof.
It is important to note a talent was a weight or measure, for example 1 Talent = 3,000 shekels, which the servant could have doubled in Roman coin similar in weight by merely exchanging 1 Hebrew talent for 2 Roman talents.
To assume banks paid interest on deposits in 33AD as they do today is somewhat irrational & absurd to say the least , apart from taxes donated into a central treasury at that time which may otherwise pay for public infrastructure returning no interest to the depositor there were no banks, simply because banking or banking debt did not entirely exist in this form back then, rather the exchange was just that, run by a pack of thieves & swindlers, an exchange that robbed people first so they could physically trade in a market, which is foremost the only real similarity in regards to today’s banks where there are no loans or borrowing nor is any legitimate debt owed to any bank or money changer for that matter & any interest allegedly earned today as a purported investment in a bank is merely taking crumbs off the table of a monumental crime of theft , therefore any alleged earnings from a bank is taking back a mere fraction or cut of the principal & interest that was formerly stolen out of a circulation which is only ever comprised of some remaining principal at most , & to deny this is to deny the elephant in the living room which is today’s perpetual re-inflation, irreversible multiplications of artificial debt, run away federal & state debt.
Logically if banks were spending what they steal in principal & interest apposed to lending we would not be perpetually re-inflating circulation with further multiplications of artificial debt so as to physically pay the former sum of artificial debt, nor do those of us who have purported loans from a bank all work or invest in a bank so its even remotely possible to earn back what the banks steal.
Now to the novice observer , religious or otherwise, even to the atheist , one would conclude this whole parable is clearly a contradiction to a plethora of other verses in the bible that categorically condemn usury, where on the face of it, at first glance, one may well conclude this particular parable was purposely altered or even fabricated by Scribes & Pharisees some time in the distant past in an attempt to justify theft, even modern day banking evident in more recent editions of the bible , keeping in mind it was Scribes & Pharisees who were instigating theft at the temple where Jesus turned over the tables of the money changers, unless of course the true teaching behind this parable, however unclear , may well be the following.
” To assume a talent, measure of money OR even a promise is not natural like a seed that may otherwise grow & multiply is essentially incorrect if one can identify the difference between earned profit & unearned profit , where ” earned profit / sowed good seed” is increased wealth upon ones own further production, whereas ” unearned profit / sowed bad seed ” is increased wealth upon stealing another’s production & of course one who actually see’s these differences & all the resulting consequences & crimes, truly acting then , ( NOT PRETENDING ) to eradicate the injustice of all unearned profit taking, even at its root, is indeed one who is even closer to the kingdom of heaven. ” My Personal Revelation.
See an example of one who is no better than Scribes & Pharisees for he has become blind & see’s NOT the difference between earned profit & unearned profit.
The clue to unraveling the truth is seeking contradictions in whatever it maybe, even in religious texts , whether they are in contrast scholarly misinterpretations, what appear total fabrications, or a riddle that may point one in several however obscure directions, where one of which upon elementary thought & much reasoning makes otherwise perfect sense, which begs us to question is Jesus returning in the flesh himself or returning to the temple of God , your human body as it was for Jesus , in mind, heart & spirit, returning like a thief in the night removing the veil of deception, giving sight again to those who were once blind , concluding we are waiting for ourselves to act in the end of which can only be a new beginning, for we are our seed or God are one & the same, not above but one & the same ( see Matthew 13:38 & 1 Corinthians 15:38 ) & of course in relation to the temple of God , even Jesus prophesied there will be not one stone left upon another in the end that wont be thrown down, possibly by doing nothing but acquiescing & partaking in theft / mammonwhich most if not all are doing today , waiting for someone else in the flesh to save us maybe , or on a lighter note brushing ourselves off, admitting our errors & making a choice to truly walk in the footsteps of Jesus in mind, heart & spirit, even to the extent of turning over the tables of the modern day money changers who all abide by the same ancient ruse even today.
2 Thessalonians 2:4Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.
*THE RUSE*
The money changers long ago were essentially exchanging 1 talent in one denominated currency for 2 talents of another denominated currency, both of which talents where nearly the same weight or measure by a matter of grams back then, so to actually purchase in the market back in the day of Jesus one would first have to give a money changer 2 talents in coin & in return receive 1 talent in another coin, so one can at least trade in the market with that specific talent of coin (today’s bank money) , therefore the money changer has robbed the individual of 1 talent for risking nothing of their own by simply exchanging 2 for 1, or taking 100% unearned profit for nothing, by which intervention is the banks first crime today stealing a sum of principal , yet if one paid a money changer any more than 2 talents for only receiving 1 talent its therefore paying interest to a money changer for the privilege of being robbed of 1 talent in the first place , much like today, however today’s banks or modern day money changers are neither risking or giving up anything of value from the get go in any purported loan, not even 1 talent , so the only difference today compared to back then is the bank is basically exchanging 1 talent for 1 talent, only pretending to risk or give up 1 talent of their own in the exchange, essentially the bank is paying your own money back to you in a pretended loan so you can at least trade in the market & only then as consequence charge you unwarranted interest for the privilege of being robbed of 1 talent in the first place, making the imposition of interest the banks second crime of theft resulting from the first crime of theft, stealing 2 talents in total , or 2X principal , for neither risking or giving up anything of value of their own from the get go.
Considering the ancient money changers were stealing 100% & got away with it for so long it only stands to reason why today’s modern day money changers or banks are getting away with stealing 200% when your all duped into believing the monumental LIE your borrowing money from a bank, yet after reading this & doing nothing can only be the inaction of a coward .
*WHO IS THE REAL ENEMY*
Ancient Gematria (Hebrew: גימטריא/גימטריה gēmaṭriyā) is a Jewish system of numerology that assigns numerical value to a word or phrase.
Using the calculator above type in the following words exactly minus the inverted commas “ banking obfuscation of our promissory obligations to each other “ & see what number you get? Is this an uncanny Coincidence or a sign.
Revelation 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number [is] Six hundred threescore [and] six.
All one has to do is personally address the beast within each & every one of us & choose between good or evil / Christ or Anti-christ, & those who seek the external Christ or Antichrist without truly addressing what is within first will indeed remain everlasting blind in self condemnation.
2 Thessalonians 2:3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for [that day shall not come], except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
So is the above verse to possibly assume humanity is not of sin & as a result not a son or servant of perdition in any way, or does one refuse to address what is truly within?
Titus 3:11 Knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of himself.
Romans 8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit
I put to the reader again are you truly turning over the tables of the modern day money changers as it was for Jesus, not necessarily in the flesh of Jesus, but in ones mind & heart,walking after or in the footsteps of Jesus in Christ spirit in your own flesh, or does one simply serve the Anti-christ or evil pretending to serve GOD?, SO the question begs to be answered in all honesty, does one trade in mammon, does one consume mammon , possibly at the expense of another being dispossessed of all their property & wealth through no real fault of their own.
Matthew 6:24 No man [ woman ] can serve two masters: for either he [ she ] will hate the one, and love the other; or else he [ she ] will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God andmammon.
Matthew 16:26 For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?
Hebrews 4:12For the word of God [is] quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and [is] a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.
” Ignorance is the egos defense against pure fear of reality. Reality is not to be looked upon with fear rather looked upon as just information. Remember Believing Is Not Necessarily Knowing and knowing only comes from conscious observation of all information new & old.”
Ancient history written in the bible tells us long ago, around 33AD there was a prophet called Jesus who turned over the tables of the money changers, accusing them of transforming the Temple of God, or a house of prayer into a market place, described by Jesus at the time as a ” Den of Thieves “ who imposed a prevention of trade within the market, unless one exchanges money first. Nevertheless as a result 30 pieces of silver was raised to place a reward for the arrest of Jesus, now the bible doesn’t stipulate who put up the 30 pieces of silver, but its no doubt in my mind the 30 pieces of silver came from the money changers themselves, consequently Jesus was identified by Judas 3 days after, silver was paid, & Jesus was put to death on the cross soon after.
The ancient ruse of the money changer from early records was & still is very much alive today in the form of modern day banks who intervene in just about every market place on the earth.
The origin of money tells us For millennia, we have lived in an purposed obfuscation of the nature of our currency and money creation. The imposition of currencies linked to commodities, such as gold and silver, was born out of an exploitation of our universal right to issue promissory obligations to actual creditors who give up property. Banks came into existence to impose a currency that would overshadow the intrinsic characteristic of any preexisting form of money, allowing bankers, ‘money changers’, to intervene on our industry and commerce, seizing for itself all the money ever created into circulation.
Banks have never given up property or anything of value of their own commensurable to the debts they falsify to themselves and impose on us. Unwarranted interest is likewise imposed, only as if the bank risked something of their own, thus stealing & laundering circulation which irreversibly multiplies falsified debt into terminal sums of falsified debt .
Sadly today, since the conception of the internet, we now have a plethora of 11th hour pretenders advocating various interest free monetary solutions, which purported solutions fail to articulate why interest is the inherent fault in any monetary system, as a result, these pretenders all fail to identify why interest is imposed in the first place & therefore advocate the banks very first crime in their purported solutions.
It is therefore the ancient ruse of the money changer that these pretenders completely overlook, which MPE identifies as the very first crime a bank commits by a purposed obfuscation or purposed misrepresentation of our promissory obligations we really have to each other, before any banking book entry , when we only purport to borrow a sum of principal at any bank.
What most, if not all people evade today is the banks 1st crime, where a bank merely pretends to loan a sum of principal purporting to be the real creditor , however the real creditor in any transaction is one who actually gives up property such as a house for example.
The purported borrower or obligor actually creates a sum of principal by issuing a promissory note, before any banking book entry, disguised then in the form of a purported loan contract by the banks unjust intervention, imposing a purposed obfuscation upon the promissory obligation, which is a misrepresentation of a contract between a real creditor & the obligor, where both the real creditor & the obligor give up lawful consideration of value, however the bank who merely publishes a further representation ( bank money ), that evidences our promissory obligations, intervenes on the contract, which is essentially changing money, however this exchange of money is really loaning your own labour & production back to you, where the bank really gives up nothing of value except the mere cost of publishing a further representation of what both the alleged borrower & the real creditor gives up to each other.
The bank neither risks or gives up consideration of value of its own that’s commensurable or equivalent to the obligors Principal creation or equal in value to the debt it clearly falsifies to its self , imposing then, a falsified debt as a purported loan to the unsuspecting obligor or borrower , who is not even borrowing at all, rather the purported borrower has been tricked into giving up the value of two houses to a thief for only receiving the value of one house from the real creditor who actually gives up property , the bank on the other hand , or slight of hand of a thief has not only stolen the value of the house but as a result the bank commits its 2nd crime thereafter by imposing unwarranted interest on what is a falsified debt , stealing a further sum of principal again, only as if the bank gave up consideration of value of its own equivalent to the principal created for the intended representation in the first place, which is really given up by the obligor promising their future production * before any banking book entry.*
So to put it as simply as I can, the higher the interest rate, the faster money is stolen out of circulation & the lower the interest rate, the theft slows down, either way interest at any rate always shorts the circulation that’s only ever comprised of some remaining principal at most & keeps it short so the banks are always guaranteed someone or one of us will default on an alleged loan regardless.
To therefore keep these cycles of dispossession going, criminal politicians perpetually borrow back & likewise spend not only the interest but the principal also. Or rather 2 times the principal for example , that we the people originally created & paid out of circulation on all our falsified debts. Borrowed back, then, by criminal politicians ( who work for banks not the people ) as irreversible sums of national debt, over & over, again & again to perpetually re-inflate circulation as its being perpetually paid out of circulation, including further principal created by the alleged borrower upon any NEW alleged loans, which is concurrently paid out of circulation on top of any former sum of artificial debt or any former reflation , paid out again & again, over & over, on all our very own, personal, but falsified debts to all the local banks, only to have it always come back again & again, over & over as a irreversible multiplication of artificial indebtedness, which is indeed, at the end of the day, nothing more than a * monumental theft & one big money laundering racket. * , See >Banks vs MPE illustrations
No man [ woman ] can serve two masters: for either he [ she ] will hate the one, and love the other; or else he [ she ] will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon. Matthew 6:24
” Ignorance is the egos defense against pure fear of reality. Reality is not to be looked upon with fear rather looked upon as just information. Remember Believing Is Not Necessarily Knowing and knowing only comes from conscious observation of all information new & old.”
Please Read & sign the UNITED PEOPLES MANDATE > HERE
Due to conforming with MPEs copyright the * NOW OFFICIAL MANDATE * can only be found at http://perfectedeconomy.org/ , if its found anywhere else on the internet in its original context, copy right privilege has therefore not been granted.
YOU CAN CLICK > HERE TO DIRECTLY EVALUATE THE NATIONAL AMENDMENT FOR MPE+ACR™ , ALTERNATIVELY YOU CAN LIKEWISE LISTEN TO THE AUDIO OF THE MANDATE & SIMULTANEOUSLY READ THE TEXT HERE .
Those of you who want to directly sign the * now official mandate * as from the 21 December 2012 click> HERE or see the link above at the top of the page.
PLEASE NOTE : It is paramount we have the UNITY & VOICE in tuning a page in history by our overwhelming numbers on this official mandate so as to actually implement MPE , if we fail this opportunity now to do something about our purposed exploitation we will only have ourselves to blame in the very end, if its not you that will loose everything it will most certainly be your children that will be finally dispossessed of all their property & wealth, evasion therefore of a proven mathematical certainty is your choice & your choice alone, however it will be your own children who will be ultimately holding YOU accountable for your non actions, remember this when your children & grandchildren look you in the eye & ask why you did nothing at the time knowing of MPE?
20120317 mike montagne 050 exercising mpe against foreclosure original appellants meeting.
[audio http://www.ftp.perfectedeconomy.org/ftp/mike-montagne-on-tns-radio–BROADCAST-ARCHIVE/individual-programs/20120317-mike-montagne-of-pfmpe-on-tnsradio-050-excercising-mpe-against-foreclosure–orig-appellants-meeting-MONO.mp3 |titles=20120317-mike-montagne-of-pfmpe-on-tnsradio-050-excercising-mpe-against-foreclosure–orig-appellants-meeting-MONO.mp3|width=650|bg=0x00000|righticon=0x99CC00|loader=0xCC3300|]
Q: Is savings a promissory obligation that issues new money into circulation ?
A : No its not , savings or earned profit is the evidence of a unexploited promissory obligation someone issues before publication , savings or earned profit in MPE™ is a further representation that always always always equals the issuance or representation of one of our very own UNEXPLOITED promissory obligations , OUR promissory obligations are the creation of money.
Savings however is the resulting evidence from the outset of an unexploited promissory obligation. You can give your savings away in MPE™ but you can’t issue a promissory obligation representing nothing in doing so , if you want to pay above consumption or above the remaining value of an item it has to come out of your own savings .
EXAMPLE : In the unlikely case you Issue a promissory obligation for a million dollars to buy a 100 thousand dollar house your stuck paying down a million dollars for receiving a 100 thousand dollar house aren’t you ? so it serves no purpose paying over & above what something is worth just like today? However if you skip town or die for example failing to fulfill the million dollar obligation we are left with a 100 thousand dollar house needing to retire a million dollars from circulation?, So how we insulate against these occurrences in MPE™, unfortunate or otherwise , is where all promissory obligations that issue new money into circulation are represented by remaining property value or remaining consumption left on property thus the remaining property value is fully redeemable if someone dies or skips town , in other words the remaining property value can be sold & likewise the circulation that represents the remaining value of the property can be rightfully retired by the new purchaser.
Q .What’s the difference between the money banks steal today & our savings in a Mathematically Perfected Economy™?.
A . Our savings is spent directly into the economy & rightfully retired on someone else’s promissory obligation , savings is always a part of circulation & when its spent its circulates further until such time all property that was originally purchased that issued new money into circulation upon a promissory obligation looses value upon ones consumption thus the money representing what is consumed is paid down & rightfully retired from circulation at the rate of one’s consumption .
1) THE RATE OF DECREASING CIRCULATION IN MPE™? : A house may take 100 years or more to retire the circulation that represents that house . (note: In MPE™ you can pay down your house faster above consumption if you wish BUT the money you pay in advance is not retired straight away, it remains in your own account & it’s still retired as you consume the remainder of the house)
2) THE RATE INCREASING CIRCULATION IN MPE™? : Building a new house however may take months to build so any NEW circulation that represents that NEW house or any NEW property on a whole perpetually increases circulation equal to the remaining property value & equal to remaining obligation .
So as long as people are issuing NEW promissory obligations we will always have a perpetual increase in circulation per NEW represented property value as opposed to our consumption that retires money generally at a slower rate ( not at a lower rate ) ,consumption WE the people choose which at any rate is retiring principal equal to remaining obligation & equal to the remaining property value regardless . So there simply is no circulatory deflation, likewise there is no deficiency in the remaining volume of circulation available to service remaining principal debt over the life time of any obligation.
Now If we use logic here folks, Saving vast sums of money cant short a circulation that’s perpetually increasing upon new representation , likewise spending vast sums of savings all at once will only result in someone else earning that money & likewise retiring that money, either now or in 100 years .
In actual fact not only we all would have the ability to own our own home in MPE™ ,we would have that much money we could also put away or save 40% or 50 % of our earned income to retire from working , all of us will be self-funded retirees, the more you save the earlier you can retire from working if you want even at the age of 35 or 45 if you really want, its up to the individual really, you might want to work 3 days a week & retire at 55, the opportunities & freedom of choice is endless? Now if we look at this in another perspective if we pay down circulation at the rate of consumption or depreciation industry & commerce in MPE™ would also have this extra money to expand business , employ more people , pay more to people , unemployment will be by choice NOT IMPOSED ,employment will flourish , likewise we won’t be wasting vast amounts of natural resources because business will be paying their principal debt down at the rate of depreciation or consumption so naturally things will be built to last longer resulting in lower rates of payment over the lifetime of what is purchased to retire money thus leaving more capital or earned profit to expand business , pay more money to employees , employ more employees, likewise competition will also flourish keeping the price or cost of production competitive in what will be a true free enterprise market based on innovation rather than built in obsolescence & a throw away society . Price inflation on a whole will be a thing of the past. Price inflation today is caused by interest that’s imposed on all our industry & commerce which is passed on to the consumer , there is no interest imposed in MPE™. Having written this folks ,anyone who denies MPE™ must have rocks in their head?
Whereas what the difference between savings in MPE™ to what banks do today is the banks first steal the principal we create ,as a result or consequence of this theft often 2X OR 3X the principal in interest over the lifetime of an “ alleged loan “ is also stolen perpetually shorting circulation until such time the same money stolen & laundered out of circulation on all our own falsified debt to local banks is loaned back as irreversible sums of national debt , only then its spent back into circulation to re-inflate circulation by criminal politicians or government representatives merely attempting then to re-inflate a circulation that’s always perpetually depleting or being stolen at a greater rate than any prior rate of perpetual re-inflation that’s necessary so at least some of us ( not all of us mathematically impossible ) can physically earn that money to service the former debt or our falsified debts to banks thus keeping the banking cycles of dispossession or theft going . See Banks vs MPE Illustrations .
Q : What’s the difference between the interest I charge to a friend than a bank charging interest?
A : You will spend that interest further into circulation eventually so your NOT shorting circulation & it’s more than likely earned profit your charging NOT INTEREST, realistically we don’t charge interest if we loan money to friends, You’re not a bank or publisher who steals & launders principal & interest out of circulation, shorting circulation so other people can’t spend that money further into the economy , the only way people can spend that money again today is if a criminal government who works for the banks ( NOT US ) periodically borrows that same money back again irreversibly multiplying debt then spends that money into the economy so you can then earn it ,then spend it or pay your falsified debt to a local bank which actually continues the cycles of dispossession public & private.
CONCLUSION:
If you practice banking in MPE™ you will be charged with treason it’s that simple folks.
Further Notes:
The meaning of ” inflation ” is to increase but its an abnormal or distorted increase, so there is no such thing as inflation & deflation in MPE™ because there is no distortion or abnormality ,even circulatory in nature neither a increase or decrease of circulation is abnormal or distorts the availability of the remaining volume of circulation that it was intended to represent in relation to remaining property value & remaining principal debt /obligation which are balanced or always equal at all times .
With the total eradication of interest In MPE™ we have no price inflation on whole because the interest imposed on all our business & commerce today that’s likewise passed onto the consumer is non existent in MPE™ .
Circulatory Inflation & deflation therefore just doesn’t happen from the get go in MPE™ even when an obligor issues a promissory obligation for new represented property that issues new money into circulation simply because this increase of circulation is immediately equal to the remaining principal debt & remaining value of the property that the obligor purchased so long as the obligor retires principal at the rate of their consumption there is no inflation or deflation.
Deflation is to reduce or a reduction in the availability of circulation resulting in a deficient circulation . so in MPE™ we don’t even have deflation or an insufficient volume of circulation simply because we will always have exactly the required amount of money per representation available left in circulation to pay down & retire the remaining principal from circulation in servicing any outstanding obligation , balancing then circulation equal to the remaining obligation & equal to the remaining property value .
Circulatory Inflation & Circulatory deflation therefore means there is a volumetric impropriety that exists in the remaining availability or volume of circulation for what it was intended to represent which is a volume of circulation that’s abnormally above or below its intended representation, therefore the remaining volume of circulation is not balanced or not equal to the remaining property value & not equal to the remaining obligation or debt.
Australia for Mathematically Perfected Economy™ 