This is the Freedom Of Information request we put to the Bank of England back in 2011 at asking 4 simple questions
1) What lawful consideration do you claim the BoE gives up when it creates money ?
2) How then does the bank (or does the bank) claim there is a debt to the bank ? 3) What is the claim to interest then, when the bank can do no more than absorb the costs of merely publishing evidence of our promissory obligations *to each other* ? 4) How is it possible even to maintain a vital circulation without accumulating inevitably terminal sums of debt ?
Note: The end result was of course as usual “EVASION”.
You can put these questions to any bank, even peripheral banks . Try it & you will basically get the same response . They will evade answering these questions particularly the first knowing all too well if they do it will be self incriminating or admitting to theft.
Think about it — If they’re not stealing in the form of pretend loans they would simply answer the damn questions wouldn’t they? but their pathetic excuse for not answering them is that these questions are unintelligible. In the end the BoE claimed the expense they would have to forgo finding the answers to these simple questions would be too costly for them. Too costly for them alright because if they answered the questions it would end their crime of theft & they damn well know it.
All they have to do is answer the first question really, because if they can prove they give up consideration of commensurable value in the creation or any loan of money the following questions are made redundant, except question 4 of course, simply due the current escalations of debt, which they then have to explain how & why is not terminal, which we already know they cant answer, because no one on this planet can prove or demonstrate how the sum of interest is created & issued into circulation above the sum of principal that takes us back to question 1 again. In retrospect questions 2, 3 & 4 take you back to question 1, which is why its the first question, that’s hardly unintelligible.
Its really a YES or NO answer to the first question. Do you give up consideration of value in the creation of money? . Is your answer YES or NO?. If your answer is YES what consideration are you then giving up in the creation of money ? but they refuse to even do that. Unintelligible my arse — The question couldn’t be any more simpler.
We are only asking the bank the same question we would otherwise ask ourselves to identify who exactly is creating money, determining then if any loan transpires or not. So If anyone of us was asked if we give up consideration of value in the creation of money the answer would be logically YES, & if asked what consideration are we giving up — pure observation alone tells anyone with a half a brain that we are giving up our labour & production that has the only lawful consideration of commensurable value.
So if it is we who create all new money, which we have already proven to be the case for nearly 50 years already, predominately by the purchaser who issues a promissory obligation/note before publication, before any subsequent deposit — so how is it even ethically or rationally possible for the “obligor” (creator of money) to borrow what has not yet been paid & or deposited from the resulting sale?
The simple answer its not possible. To suggest we loan or borrow money from each other defies all logic & reason — putting the cart before the horse. Indicating further we are not even loaning or borrowing money from each other either, much less from a thieving bank. When the unadulterated debt is merely an obligation by the *obligor* to “pay & retire” the principal, free from exploitation or unjust intervention.
Make no mistake MPE is NOT claiming there is no debt, simply because the only debt that transpires is the true debt we have to each other. Therefore the argument is not to somehow get out of paying the debt altogether, but instead the intent to restore today’s falsified debts (phony loans) to their original unadulterated state where there never is any loan or borrowing.
For detailed correspondence regarding this FOI request please visit WhatDoTheyKnow. OR HERE.
Please note “whatdotheyknow” have since taken down the detailed correspondence which can only be perceived as further EVASION of the facts.
Some time ago I had a fellow with a doctorate in economics question why I use the word “volume”. He proceeded to then hold some authority over me because according to him today’s economics does not use volumes & because I do not have a degree like him in today’s lie of economy I have no authority on the subject, evidently because I’m using volumes apparently.
My reply was quite simple when I proceeded to ask him if today’s economics uses percentages to demonstrate rates of profit, margins of solubility or purported growth how is this not a measurement in respect to volume?
For example if you have a 25% profit is this not telling you that 25% exceeds the volume of 100% invested?
So if you invest $80 & get back $100 is this not a 25% gain or alternatively a $20 gain in proportion to the initial $80 investment. Therefore $80 is your 100% volume or overall outlay & $20 is your 25% gain.
Eg: $80 = 100% ÷ 4 = $20 = 25%
In short the percentage (%) is a scale used to measure something as a fraction comparative to associated volume.
So If you want to take down any phony economist in one question just ask them what is a volume of circulation that is neither above or below its intended representation? or in broad obscure terms otherwise taught in universities that might make some sense to these buffoons; What is a volume of circulation that is neither above or below the cost of goods & services(ie:representation).
Without giving away the answer here its simply a question of logic that extends the mathematics from one point to another.
Hint: if “C” is neither above “I” or below “D” what is “C” in proportion to “V”?
Of course its a Circulation always [_____] in Volume , or alternatively a circulation always [______] in Value in proportion to the Volume of Circulation relating to the dispositional impropriety of Inflation & Deflation in respect to represented property, which gives you the same answer of logic anyhow.
Those of you who cant immediately answer this question I suggest you read the home page or seek the answer in the menu.
I’m nonetheless still waiting for this pretended expert’s answer, which is an answer so simple it equates to the rudimentary logic of a kindergarten child putting a square peg through a square hole.
Share markets are only ever artificially sustained by further borrowing (alleged loans) which is mathematically impossible to pay down due to the volumetric impropriety of interest (PERPETUAL DEFLATION) .
Therefore any AAA rating is entirely artificial based on any nations ability to maintain or service the ever greater escalations of falsified debt in perpetual cycles of reflation, yet never ever paying it down.
Point blank regardless of any increase in production under the ruse of banking you have no growth so long as you are all paying principal & interest out of a volume of a circulation thats only ever comprised of some remaining principal at most, not only on all your personal falsified debts (phony loans), regardless if its to purchase a home, shares or whatever, but as consequence its stealing however much interest we pay above the sum of principal inclusive, which is stealing all that much further from each & everyone of us in just spending money today.
Whats so difficult to comprehend HERE folks?
So long as you are all paying the added cost of interest in “artificial price inflation” the primary school mathematics is clearly telling us you have DEFLATION or a DECREASE IN VALUE per goods & services (per representation) by however much interest you pay out of a general circulation above the sum of principal, which is a circulation that only ever consists of some remaining principal at the very most, even upon further cycles of reflation in any increase in debt, whether its public or private, which never ever increases the remaining circulation above the sum of principal that it initially was intended to represent.
The following is the basic difference between Good debt & Bad debt, without the bullshit from some halfwit politician, pretend economist or news reporter who clearly failed primary school mathematics.
GOOD DEBT
Is when we logically eradicate the need for perpetual reflation by simply eradicating the unwarranted imposition of interest on falsified debts (phony loans) & therefore eradicating the ruse of banking altogether that neither ethically or rationally lends us money in the first place, where any increase in circulation can otherwise instead equal the remaining debt & equal the related property value by *rightfully retiring principal* (NOT STEALING & LAUNDERING) at the rate of depreciation or consumption of the related property.
BAD DEBT
Is when purported banks only ever pretend to loan us the sum of principal, where the bank is neither risking or giving up commensurable consideration of value from the banks otherwise prior legitimate possession that might justify any loan to one of us, which is nonetheless charging us a further sum of principal again in unwarranted interest for the privilege of being robbed of the former sum of principal in a purported loan that in truth never transpires, that subsequently as a result sets of these terminal cycles of deflation & reflation. Primarily due to the volumetric impropriety of interest (perpetual deflation) we all formerly pay out of circulation in all private debt, which not only irreversibly multiplies both government & private debt in perpetual cycles of reflation, but the very process reflation can only ever be artificially sustained with further falsified debt.
Therefore the process of perpetual deflation by interest & perpetual reflation with new debt that never increases the remaining circulation above the sum of principal can only ever at best service the former debt, BUT NEVER THE NEW due to the added cost of interest banks clearly steal above the sum of principal inclusive in purported loans, which is stealing all that much further from us in artificial price inflation when each & everyone of us just spends money today.
IN SHORT FOR THE DUMMIES. Bad debt: Is a so called loan that in truth never transpires, making the purported loan a monumental crime of theft instead.
Good debt: Is merely an obligation by the debtor (obligor/creator of money/one of us) to *pay & retire* principal — free from unjust intervention or exploitation — where there never was or ever is any loan or borrowing.
To begin lets study the bullshit in this article below that would have you irrationally believing the lie Quantitative easing (QE) creates new money, which is just a further attempt to justify non-existent inflation as inflation. If I may quote from the usury media article below.
“Policymakers also push the button on a quantitative easing programme – which will pump tens of billions of pounds of newly created money into Britain’s troubled economy.”
How do we know this is bullshit, well firstly all you have to do is look at the official data in the UK (see below) regarding its money supply (M0) from March to December 2009 & you will clearly see there was no increase of £125bn in the money supply at that time, which would have otherwise near tripled the nations (M0) cash & coin monetary supply.
All that transpired in 2009 was instead a increase of 2 billion (M0) in new cash & coin that we the people create anyhow because it further represents a percentage or fraction of ledger money (M2) that includes bank deposits in circulation anyhow, plus an increase of an additional 1.1 trillion in (M2) ledger bank deposit money we create in purported loans in private debt. Keeping in mind a portion of that 1.1 trillion is money likewise earned or unearned from overseas that is nonetheless money we create in private debt in any nation.
So in ether graph (M0) & (M2) you see the increase in the UK money supply remains steady as the years pass primarily due to perpetual reflation as every increase in government debt, which irreversibly multiplies all this falsified debt into terminal debt due to the volumetric impropriety of interest (perpetual deflation) in all private debt, hence the need for perpetual reflation in government debt that is mathematically impossible to pay down, which is a process of perpetual deflation & reflation that cant ever increase the remaining circulation above or beyond the sum of principal initially created in private debt.
Secondly logic alone should tell you banks do not ever create money, much less ever loan money if they neither risk or give up consideration of value, concluding its we the people who create all new money (principal only) in private debt because we give up the only commensurable consideration of value in the only true debt, trade or transaction, however due to peoples irresponsibility they allow banks to purposely misrepresented our debts to each other in alleged loans from a thieving bank, which is a falsified debt to a thieving bank who gives up squat.
WHAT THEN IS QUANTITATIVE EASING EXACTLY?
Well, its similar in respects to a bailout. That is both of which are only ever servicing inter-banking debt or in house debt between banks, which is ultimately between banks & the central bank of any nation.
Try to Imagine a big fat central banker pouring already stolen money out of the left pocket & into the right pocket, because this is whats essentially happening where qualitative easing (QE) is bypassing the direct purchase of government debt where a bailout otherwise would not.
The only difference then is the bailout increases government debt as the money travels from one pocket to another, & QE bypasses the direct purchase of any new government debt in the sense its indirectly purchasing formerly purchased government debt from banks or other banking corporations, so the process of QE is not increasing government debt by purchasing new bonds, but instead previously purchased bonds from other banks before their maturity date, so in effect the central bank gets that money back from the taxpayer plus interest when those bonds mature.
Whichever the process BAILOUTS or QE its only ever temporally solving any outstanding inter-banking debt between banks, simply because the people can no longer service this inter-banking debt via their own personal falsified debts anymore due to interest of course, which is all owed (allegedly owed) to the central bank (mere publisher) anyhow.
Whether its a bailout or QE its never reaching industry & commerce or never reaching the people in this lie of economy today in the entire process of both.
We could almost debate if the central bank even parts with any sum of QE because its ultimately owed (allegedly) to the central bank anyway, hence the QE is just another sleight of hand of a thief, which is just a thief taking already stolen money out of one pocket & just quietly slipping it back in the other pocket, & hey presto the bankers fool see’s the big fat central banker create all this new money out of thin air (NOT),, & apparently its somehow magically increasing a monetary circulation to justify inflation that is clearly non-existent..
So the reader might ask now whats ultimately transpiring with that stolen money in the big fat central bankers pocket?
Well, with the assistance of political betrayers its perpetually laundered back into the monetary circulation as every increase in government debt or federal expenditure, perpetually reflating circulation as we the people consecutively pay principal & interest out of circulation in all private debt .
This is why the graph above shows a steady increase in the money supply (principal only) that we people initially create in private debt regardless, apposed to any dramatic jump in the money supply that possibly might otherwise justify qualitative easing pumping all this new money into circulation to further justify inflation which is clearly non-existent, much like any phony loan to us in private debt, where a thieving bank is pretending to create new money yet again & would have you irrationally believe just by increasing the circulation by principal alone is inflationary. Which is false assumption so long as were all paying *principal+interest* out of a general circulation only ever comprised of some remaining *principal* at most.
No one on the face of this planet can prove or demonstrate how any sum of interest is created or issued into circulation above the some of principal.
Hypothetically even if QE creates new money above the sum of principal we initially create in all private debt — that 125 billion is nothing compared to the trillions (M2) we create & pay out of circulation in all private debt — stolen many, many, many times over in perpetual cycles of deflation due to interest.
Therefore regardless if a mere 125 billion somehow magically appears in the monetary circulation as new money, WHICH IT DID NOT, not without any sale, trade or transaction to otherwise pump it into any lie of economy it cant possibly justify inflation regardless, not so long as we are all paying billions if not trillions in principal + interest out of circulation.
If any of you want more evidence look no further than the current UK national debt (perpetual reflation).
Here again I’m using logic alone & primary school mathematics to prove banks do not ever create money, not even by quantitative easing, much less can QE stimulate non-existent growth or justify non-existent inflation, not that inflation can be any rational indicator of true sustainable growth.
Absolutely not, simply because there is not enough volume of gold out there to equal all our labour & production, much less equal any increase in our production.
The inherent volumetric impropriety (perpetual deflation) of any finite metal such as gold acts much the same as the volumetric impropriety of interest perpetually devaluing our production & the physical gold or money itself it further represents.
Having gold as an unnecessary further representation of our labour & production yet again is utter buffoonery, considering our labour & production already has the only intrinsic value & the added volumetric impropriety of interest can only escalate terminal monetary destruction all that much faster, which is the very reason why gold is no longer used to represent our production, primarily as a means to prolong monetary destruction even further so banks can keep on stealing the value of our labour & production & not devalue the gold they have already stolen.
Considering banks do not ever create money or ever give up consideration of value in any purported loan to one of us LOGICALLY all gold that once represented money in the past has already been physically stolen by banking in falsified debts that are mathematically impossible to pay down, if not due to the inherent volumetric impropriety of gold itself its by interest or both.
Therefore even if we eradicated the crime of banking & or interest returning a gold standard or even using physical gold coin as currency is stupid as stupid gets because you are still left with perpetual, monumental deflation.
All those who believe gold can somehow hold the solution only proves to me these deranged individuals not only failed primary school mathematics but do not even know what money is, how its really created & what it truly represents, which is not a gold coin or gold bar, but instead the value of our labour & production that has the only intrinsic value all money past, present & future records, evidences & represents.
What these fools fail to conclude is its only the volume of money, regardless if the tokens of representation are in the form of fiat/paper, gold/coin/bar, coffee beans, rum, or dog shit–money ultimately has to equal our labour & production in volume. So unless you want to carry around dog shit in your pocket fiat/paper money is the only viable rational alternative .
Of course you could carry around gold coins in your pocket, however as we increase our production those coins will be getting smaller & smaller in size/weight/volume to equal any increase in production, which is not only devaluing the physical gold itself, but devaluing what that gold is supposed represent— in our labour & production.
In other words the money itself is only numbers in volume that further represents the underpinning value of our labour & production, or our hard earned, blood sweat & tears we give up to each other, which is hardly nothing or thin air, otherwise banks would not be stealing the value of our labour & production in purported loans that do not ethically or even rationally transpire in the first place .
I have literally lost count how many times I have proven to the world gold is not a viable monetary solution, it never has as a matter of verifiable mathematical fact, but unfortunately there are those out there who still insist gold is the viable solution, without proving & even demonstrating it ever has been a viable solution or ever can be a viable solution.
So the question I ask these deranged individuals is where is your mathematics? Where is your logic? How do you account for deflation?
The simple answer is you cant, because you have thrown all rudimentary logic & mathematics out the window & instead solely relying on mere conjecture, unqualified assumptions & more often barefaced lies to sell non-solution only as if it was a solution.
Before we begin its important to understand the words “credit ” & “debit” are terms used in accounting. The credit entry is the amount added to an account. The debit entry is the amount subtracted from an account.
Where everyone goes terribly wrong concerning “money” & “credit”, however, is the assumption credit is money, when credit is instead value given up in exchange for money.
For example the value of a home in any sale is the credit value given up in return for monetary value. So just because an account has been credited the money value & or “money & credit” has equal value is not to blindly assume money value is credit value.
Although it is true money & credit are representations of value — both have very different origins of value each to their own in one very important but often totally ignored respect.
MONEY: 1) Money or a promissory note / obligation represents the immediate or future value the buyer is giving up, however the issuer or creator of new money is the obligor (still the buyer) which is value that represents the obligor’s own immediate & or future production which has consideration of value.
CREDIT: 2) Credit is simply the value the seller is giving up such as a home which has consideration of value.
CONCLUSION:
Therefore the exchange of different entitlements of value or transaction of two different origins of value, such as for example money value the buyer gives up & credit value the seller gives up is what logically makes a debt when those values of entitlement to another’s production each to their own is exchanged in any debt, sale, trade or transaction & only then is there a transfer of entitlement of value between the buyer & seller.
Therefore money simply records, evidences & likewise represents the value of our labour & production we give up to each other, however it is important to understand money not only records, but likewise evidences the exchange of two representations of value “money & credit” that points to who is actually giving up consideration of value, which are in fact not one & the same that the ruse of banking would otherwise have you believe to the contrary for reasons I articulate in the next paragraph, when they are instead values each to their own exchanged in any debt, sale, trade or transaction.
THE RUSE OF BANKING:
The ruse of banking is of course quite simple & that is purported banks not only pretend to be the real creditor otherwise giving up a home in a transaction — whom I might add cant even rationally lend what has not yet been paid to them, but its clearly evident when banks repossess what the bank never possessed in the first place. Furthermore the bank likewise pretends they create money one & the same as the creditor only AS IF the creditor creates money, purportedly creating & issuing money when the bank is clearly neither the creditor much less even the creator of money (purported credit), simply because banks do not risk or give up commensurable consideration of value. Not in the banks pretended creation or mere publication of OUR money. Not in any purported loan to one of us. Not in any debt, sale, trade or transaction.
What essentially transpires under the ruse of banking is both the buyer & seller are still physically giving up value in the one & only true debt such as any sale, trade or transaction of money & credit, but not from any bank to you the buyer in any purported loan (falsified debt) preceding the sale.
The bank is only ever loaning (pretend loan) the value of your own production back to you & then charging you a further sum of principal again in unwarranted interest for the privilege of being robbed of the former sum of principal in a purported loan that never ever transpires in the first place, due to the banks unjust intervention on the true debt we have to each other, where the bank is neither risking or giving up consideration of value from the banks otherwise prior legitimate possession.
Logically there never was or ever is any loan or borrowing. Making the purported loan a monumental crime of theft instead, which is not only stealing the value of one home equal to the buyers immediate & or future production, but often due to interest the bank is stealing twice the value of the home that can & in fact does multiply the theft 1000 fold — over the decades — in subsequent sales of homes, which is not only artificially inflating the price of homes into oblivion but everything else due to the added cost of interest, only to steal all that much further from each & everyone of us when we simply spend money today.
I think this is important enough to publish a short post in relation to those who raise false assertions that gold consistently represents value over time using the purchase of a suit as an example , contrary to these unqualified assertions a suit cost nearly 6 ounces of gold back in 1864, where we could of purchased almost 10 suits for 1 ounce of gold at its all-time high in 2011.
As you will see below, calculating for the 2011 all-time high (as well) demonstrates an even more pronounced mis-representation of historic prices by 57-fold.
Click the image to enlarge
Original Source : mike montagne founder of PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™, original (1968) architect of mathematically perfected economy™, and principal author of the global amendment for mathematically perfected economy and absolute consensual representation™(C) Copyright 2014 by mike montagne and PFMPE™.
To be further informed about the adverse dispositions of a gold standard see my other blog post ” Why a gold standard cant work “
The following is a reply I left on a blog ” thereisnodebt ” who is not only advocating MPE, but the administrator of that blog appears to be that impressed with my words in relation to the very title of his blog ( which is the very reason why I wrote what I did ) he made a separate post relaying my reply to his readers , nevertheless I think its worth re-posting here once again on my blog & I thank the admin for his due diligence.
Gday
It is true there is no debt owed to any bank, however this is not to infer there is no debt we have between ourselves for this otherwise unexploited debt is merely an exchange of our labour & production, redeeming money for property, where there are no loans or borrowing.
The key to comprehending true debt is to know what money actually is, what it truly represents & how its truly created. Money is therefore a debt instrument, not a debt itself, simply because the exchange or the act of redeeming money for property & or services is the only true debt, money is therefore a record of entitlement that one may receive on the exchange or trans/action that merely evidences what value we have given up to each other, thereafter upon fulfillment of a debt or trans/action money is most certainly not a debt but a record of earned entitlement that can be spent elsewhere in the course of redeeming another’s production & finally money is created by our promissory obligations we have to each other, which is only a promise to pay an otherwise *unexploited obligation*, with one’s own *labour and production*, for what one consumes of another’s *labour and production*… where again, there are no loans, no borrowing, & only as a result, likewise is there no interest.
It is true there has never been any lending or borrowing since the conception of banking so why would you or I propose anything else but to rectify today’s falsified debt ( falsified debt = theft ) that merely pretends to loan money, into what a debt aught to rightly be?
Most people fail to even comprehend the only real intrinsic value is what money actually represents, evidences & records upon the exchange, promissory obligation ( money creation ) inclusive, that’s in short the value of the labour & production we give up to each other, which is logically a principal debt where there are no loans or borrowing.
However I must stress, ever since the conception of banking, all banks, no exceptions, have falsified this otherwise unexploited debt to themselves by unjust intervention on the exchange, contract / promissory obligation, pretending ,then, to risk or give up value of their own in the exchange, contract / promissory obligation. either in banks publication, purported creation of money, or any purported loan the bank may impose on one of us as a result.
So to conclude what I have written here is to not infer there is no debt because there actually is a debt between ourselves, & to deny this debt is to deny a theft due to the banks unjust intervention or purposed obfuscation of our promissory obligations we have to each other, which in turn allows banks / money changers to steal the true value of what is given up in the otherwise unexploited debt ” X2 ” because of unwarranted interest only as if the bank risked or gave up consideration of value of their own in the exchange, so it would be even incorrect to assume one is not paying interest if they haven’t a falsified debt or purported loan from a bank simply because all the principal & interest all industry & commerce pays to banks is logically passed on to the consumer in the resulting price of goods & services, thus the added cost of interest above the initial cost of principal is the very cause of most if not all price inflation today, artificial in nature, since the very conception of banking, giving one only the illusion rising prices means rising value when the true value of all money & property or the value of our labour & production we give up to each other in any exchange or trans/action is being stolen by banking only to be borrowed back as perpetual re-inflation or irreversible multiplications of artificial debt, federal /state debt, so its physically possible for at least some of us to earn principal & interest out of a circulation consisting of some remaining principal at most to actually service the former sum of artificial debt, until such time, upon terminal cycles of dispossession everyone will be dispossessed of all their property & wealth one by one in the very end, & believe it or not all this is simply done by a bank pretending to loan value it neither risks or gives up in any exchange or in an otherwise unexploited debt.
I hope after reading this some of you might want to read my other blog post ” Refuting , Paul Grignon author of Money as Debt ” where its clear Paul wants preserve the LIE we not only borrow money from ” faux creditors” EG: BANKS , but likewise proposing the same crime of theft or further obfuscation of our promissory obligations ( the banks first crime ) in his purported solution, which is nothing but a plagiarism & distortion of MPE in an attempt to preserve exploitation , or the LIE we borrow money from a purported creditor, apposed to any true creditor who most certainly does not lend money , but rather paid in full for giving up commensurable value resulting from the outset of an obligor’s promissory obligation ( money creation )
What is MPEs 1.1.1 ratio ?
1: All money created into circulation is equal or no more than
1: Remaining value of represented property that’s equal or no more than
1: Remaining obligation that’s rightfully retired at the rate of our consumption
What is the relationship in regards to the Gospels of the bible?
1: (Creation) Spirit of GOD or seed.
1: (remaining value) Maintaining growth in Gods tree through the seasons of soul spirit baring adolescent fruit.
1: (remaining obligation) Maturity of the tree acquiring the spirit of Christ which bares mature fruit, repeating these cycles every season until the tree is no more & returns to the earth it was originally germinated or conceived.
Keeping in mind nothing on this earth physically lasts forever including fruit that has a shelf life & with each bite we are consuming its value that can only give further credence to MPE which conforms exactly to the laws & principles of nature & life which are: balance, equilibrium, homeostasis, synergy, symbiosis, abundance, evolution, expansion, metamorphosis & FREE WILL. As in nature, so in MPE: simple, holographic, mathematically perfect & reciprocal.
Indeed God is an eternal spirit who belongs to each & every one of us , God has no gender but a seed of all life as we should rightly know it ” GOD SPIRIT “, & thus the individual soul having the spirit of God is the beginning or adolescent growth & of course the Christ spirit of God through the soul of man is upon mature growth of God Spirit & this is the true trinity in the spirit of God plain & simple , not any false representation of god, gods or goddesses in the flesh.
I’m absolutely blown away with this stroke of revelation with the 1.1.1 ratio in contrast with not only the trinity of God spirit within us (well some of us) but the tree of life of all things , this cant be just a coincidence.
THE TRUE SIGN OF PEACE
As a child I was brought up as a Christian & the teachings of the bible was on the most part contradictory ,obscure & confusing ,but of recent I have been revisiting my teachings of the bible in an attempt to make sense of it all & to my conclusion after much soul searching I have concluded the Bible has been greatly obfuscated to make something appear to be true when it is indeed not, so upon using rational logic & much contemplation in methodical reasoning of deduction, observing all information new & old I have concluded all sexual connotation in relation to the one & only God is derived from the masonic Jew / scribe pharisee obfuscations of the Gospels within the bible , which are pertaining to false Gods such as king , Lord, father, son, sun, EL, Falice, Obelisk, bulls , golden calf’s, & mother , Isis, phallus ,yonic, vagi etc, all false representations or purposed misrepresentations of God & who do you think is possibly responsible for these misrepresentations today? see the video below .
The purported father, son & holy spirit/ghost pertaining to the holy trinity of God is essentially a purposed misrepresentation or lie so one is in turn worshiping false gods, not only in the flesh, but possibly the idol worship of banking itself for hundreds if not thousands of years now, which is in my opinion the one world religion of Anti-christ, whom all on the most part partake & practice in today, & yes, this even applies to self proclaimed atheists, nevertheless imposed on the world for well over a millennia now.
Matthew 23:9And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.
God is a spirit who has no gender & Jesus was born of the flesh had the spirit of Christ within his temple of God, indeed Jesus is not returning in the flesh himself, but rather it is Christ Spirit who is returning within our temple of God through the soul as it was for Jesus .See the parable of the talents
John 6:63 It is the [Christ] spirit that quickeneth [quickening /born again]; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I [Jesus] speak unto you, they are [Christ] spirit , and they are life[eternal life].
The soul, or image of God spirit / seed is of course man or woman in the flesh, which is the very conduit for the spirit of God to manifest into Christ spirit , keeping in mind man is only a copy or image of God spirit further represented in the flesh, therefore the soul is most definitely a part of the trinity for if there was no soul there is no path way for any growth of spirit & soul.
All one has to do is personally address the beast within each & every one of us & choose between good or evil / Christ or Anti-christ, however those who seek the external Christ or Anti-christ without truly addressing what is within first will indeed remain everlasting blind in self condemnation.
Romans 8:9 – But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.
John 16:13 – Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth [Christ Spirit], is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he [Christ Spirit] shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever shall hear, shall he [Christ Spirit] speak: and he [Christ Spirit] will shew you things to come
John 14:17 – [Even] the Spirit of truth [Christ Spirit]; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth not, neither knoweth: but ye know ; for [Christ Spirit] dwelleth with you, shall be in you.
Money is indeed the clue to ones salvation here if one truly follows it all the way back to not only its conception creation but its very origin in time , beware of false profits who pretend to expose this information often in self contradiction using then unqualified assumption or just hear say of others without any formal proof or evidence.
Jesus didn’t come to bring peace but a sword , upon asking the right questions we find the sword of an irrefutable truth & one acquires self immunity, unity on only one proof of solution therefore is the only thing that will manifest heaven in righteousness on earth, once found & to deny this truth one is indeed condemning ones own self , many have already done so out of fear of self condemnation , fearing the act of a choice to take that extra step further to know more, in turn truly judging ones own actions or inaction’s deep down for God merely passes this Judgment, apposed to just believing more in unqualified ignorance & superficial hear say.
Therefore we judge ourselves upon the question at the end of the day because we cant lie to ourselves deep down, regardless what the ego says in defense God or Christ merely passes that judgment whether its Guilty or Not Guilty.
Genesis 4:9 And God said unto Cain, Where is Abel your brother? And he said, I know not: Am I my brother’s keeper?
So the question I ask does anyone reading this serve mammon in all contradiction & hypocrisy? , if not why are you not turning over the tables of the money changers & not turning over the chairs of those who do serve mammon sitting idle doing nothing but participating in the crime of banking?
Christ does not come to bring peace, but a sword of truth that hurts like a thorn at first; but in the end it blossoms like a rose.
When one is truly mature in Christ spirit one not only renounces all false gods & subsequent slave master titles, one who is categorically in Christ Spirit knows God spirit is NOT divided, or divine at all, for it is mankind who is the divine, having the choice between good or bad, only when the grape falls away from the vine the seed becomes divined, likewise one knows ( not believes ) we are ” our ” seed/God is indeed one & the same , not in the flesh, ( mankind is not God ) but in the ONE spirit of God within ( we are not individual spirits but individual souls ) , not pretending to be above God spirit , but one & the same equal in the trinity, God , soul , Christ the transitional spirit of God , through the Soul, thus born again into Christ Spirit , for it was the spirit of Christ who was talking the parables Jesus spoke, & not Jesus alone.
John 1: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Upon further revelation we might ask ourselves what does this WORD of God actually mean, keeping in mind a promise is a unilateral agreement where a covenant is a bilateral agreement, so of course in the beginning the *intent* was a promise, which created what was once possibly good.
Indeed we can conclude, the spirit of God, through an explicit *intent* created man & wo/man as an image of God spirit, or creating a further representation of God spirit but yet an image of God spirit in the flesh, whereby Gods spirit through the soul of man can possibly grow & therefore mature, opposed to a lost soul possibly stunting any true growth ,worshiping false Gods ( EG; Father, Mother, Son , santa claus etc ) or even waiting for a prophet from the distant past to return in the flesh himself, doing then absolutely nothing but worshiping false Gods in the meantime, waiting to be saved by anyone else but themselves, failing then to truly address what is within first.
One might then ask oneself has Gods original promise been purposely misrepresented in the same manner banks purposely misrepresent our promissory obligations to each other?
One might then beg to question has the bible or various other religious text’s over time been likewise purposely misrepresented in a mere attempt to deter or prevent man kind from ever truly maturing into the perfection of Christ spirit?
We might then further conclude from the outset of a promise, or the result of the unilateral WORD of God Spirit makes man a further representation & the very evidence of this original promise, one & the same, so one might then consider the money banks therefore publish may likewise be a further representation & the very evidence of our very own promise’s to each other, also one & the same, however since the conception of banking it’s been quite clear any further representation published by a bank is of course a purposed obfuscation or purposed misrepresentation of our promises to each other & quite possibly in the same process misrepresenting Gods original promise to mankind, imposing then a falsified debt by an unjust intervention on another’s promise , pretending to loan something of value the bank neither risks or gives up, essentially stealing the true value we the people give up to each other in an principal debt or a mere transaction, where there otherwise are no loans or borrowing if there was no such intervention , where a sleight of hand by a thief for well over a millennia now has been merely pretending to be the true creditor, pretending then to be the true creator, in turn quite possibly pretending to be God (false god) if you will, but yet again this unjust intervention by a thief, bank, mere publisher or corporate entity is giving up nothing of true value itself.
Some may ask, if man is the image of God spirit or further representation of a promise we might then liken man to money itself , but on the contrary we must remind ourselves money itself has no value but merely further represents the true value of a former promise which is what value we give up to each other in any exchange, so man is most definitely NOT the money, nor can anyone put a price or value on any human life, not even in any so called alleged trust fund for that matter, rather man, & or money is merely the record of what has been given up, which is thereafter the very evidence of just entitlement that’s not even a debt at all at this stage but entitlement of just reward, thus any further representation is not a debt, not until that record of entitlement is used again in redemption of like value or in a further exchange of just entitlement which may also include like value of justifiable earned gain or profit.
So Gods promise to mankind, or Gods WORD may well be the record & the very evidence of this is mankind’s entitlement where there are NO LOANS, NO BORROWING, much the same is our otherwise unexploited promissory obligations would be to each other, which is likewise a record & evidence of entitlement, where there are NO LOANS, NO BORROWING & again any true value can only be our labour & production we actually give up to each other, regardless of any misrepresentation or purposed obfuscation of a promise that irrationally claims otherwise.
Irrationally placing a price or value on our physical huE/man body’s that only God the creator has full dominion & redemption from our very first breath to our very last is most certainly not the rightful possession of anyone else to give or take away, not even to buy or on sell, not to be enslaved or misrepresented by any dictator, not by any political betrayer or representative government & most certainly not the rightful possession of any thieving bank, false god, anti-christ entity who is merely pretending to be the true creditor in turn pretending to be the true creator of which was once originally intended to be good, only so those who willfully partake in a purposed misrepresentation of what was once good is taking a share in mammon at the dire expense or unwarranted dispossession of another, & the very consequence of these actions is everyone being dispossessed of all their property & wealth one by one in the very end , keeping in mind willful participation in banking exploitation only to remain silent in utter evasion & refusing then to fully address the root cause of all exploitation today is indeed willfully giving up all rights as a human being, simply because all rights are derived from property rights, which includes such property as your human body, soul or temple of God, foremost given up & still given up today through the original promise, but in return for what one may ask?.
Well, what is given in return is humanity maintaining the very integrity of the original promise through our promises to each other, much like the true creditor that gives up property today who should rightfully uphold just reward received, or given up in an exchange resulting from a promise, which mankind has failed miserably to uphold, not even in any true sense of the word sovereign I might add & what responsibilities actually come with true sovereignty, particularly regarding theft & partaking in theft in a complete & utter contradiction of not only Gods law but mans law.
Corinthians 7:1 Having therefore these promises, dearly beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and ” soul ” [ not spirit, for GOD is neither filth nor of the flesh ], perfecting holiness in the ” awe ” of God. [ not in fear, for you cant fear what you LOVE ]
It is a fact true sovereignty cant be taken by force or stolen, however this is not to infer true sovereignty cant be given up by the souls own free will, rejecting then what is GOOD faith from within , or possibly rejecting the true spirit of GOD within ,thus instead serving mammon , ignorantly then giving up any true sovereignty, either through an imposed deception, & or in willful blind ignorance knowing deep down one is all too well taking unearned gain at the unwarranted expense of another through no real fault of that other, thus failing to truly address the very root cause of most if not all exploitation on this planet past & present .
For over 45 years now mankind’s only true salvation is an irrefutable proof of solution, or sword of truth that most in fact totally ignore & evade, where one has a choice either to remain silent, ignorantly attack out of pure fear of reality, or embrace this truth with all sincerity & learning how to obtain not only self immunity but eventual imm/unity for all, on one, & only one proof of solution, doing then what can only be considered ethically & morally right.
In all seriousness to choose any other path but MPE is indeed nothing but a choice of self condemnation & ultimate destruction not only for the individual soul, but as a result the destruction for all those whom one might possibly love, so in the end, which is NOW , is our choice as individuals to either stand up uniting on one solution & be counted on a whole, or face the dire consequences of willful evasion, willful division, irrational contradiction, or purposed inaction’s that can only lead to the ultimate dismantling & complete destruction of once was created with the explicit intent of good faith , & YES, I’m referring to the destruction of the original promise by God spirit & as a result our promises to each other & quite possibly the destruction of what comes with this original promise or word which is the very seed of life.
I have concluded the teachings of the bible is nothing but metaphoric story, or Journey of God spirit through the soul of man that one may learn further from if one has the eyes to see & ears to hear, however the bible appears to be purposely obfuscated having many metaphoric references to say the least for those who lack GOOD faith or GOD spirit within the soul , but sadly the metaphors are often contradictory by default to the true or original teaching behind the bible, thus keeping grown adults in the dark unfortunately , for example Jesus healing the sick was healing a sick soul that was rejecting God/Christ spirit, apposed to necessarily healing someone on the exterior or in the flesh as such, however this is not to suggest or infer there wasn’t a wise prophet we all commonly refer to as Jesus, who quite possibly walked the earth long ago , possibly born into Christ spirit at birth, well, this may have been the observation of others close to Jesus at that time who perceived what Jesus did & said was always, or on the most part ethically & morally right , beginning at a very young age, possibly with above average intelligence.
Although I admit I’m not a perfect man & still learning, but what I know is these words are not entirely my own, but quite possibly the words of God spirit , possibly the spirit of Christ may well be even relaying this information through my soul so those who were once blind may see what was once hidden.
John 16:13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth *Christ Spirit * [ NOT THE HOLY SPIRIT ], is come, he *Christ Spirit * will guide you into all truth: *for he shall not speak of himself* [ FOR HE HIMSELF IS NOT HE OF THE FLESH ]; but whatsoever he *the spirit of Christ* shall hear, that shall he *the spirit of Christ * speak : and he will shew you things to come.
Hebrews 4:12For the word of God [is] quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and [is] a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.
HERE IS THE TRUTH THAT WILL SET YOU FREE.
There is only one truth that shall set the world free & the sooner you all come to terms with the reality *banks (modern day money changers) don’t ever create or loan money* the sooner you will come to terms with the fact you’re all robbing each other on the sale, trade or transaction of our production, only to pay most of which (principal + interest) to an even bigger thief (ie: bank) .
None of you would be even earning a profit today if wasn’t for perpetual reflation or further borrowing (alleged borrowing /purported loans that don’t even transpire) that irreversibly multiplies all this falsified debt both public & private into terminal debt, due to the volumetric impropriety of interest (perpetual deflation) we formerly pay out of circulation above the sum of principal in all private debt (phony loans), that steals all that much further from each & everyone of us when we spend money today, where industry & commerce is passing the added cost of interest onto the consumer in the resulting price of goods & services, plus earned profit of course which is nonetheless stolen regardless when that profit is subsequently spent on whatever.
As is the ruse of the money changer likewise the ruse of banking is all quite simple really, because it plays on your own self centered greed & desires, which blinds you to the fact there is hidden hand or thief intervening on the sale trade or transaction, essentially stealing the value of the sale when you simply spend money, & its only your own self centered greed & desire that blinds you all to whats really transpiring when you spend money today.
You all see what you receive on the sale (eg: new car, home, new mobile phone etc) , you’re all happy happy right?, but you all fail to see the value of what you all give up & receive from each other on that sale is stolen many, many, many times a hundred, thousandfold over due to unjustified interest on purported loans that don’t ethically or even rationally transpire in the first place, & of course again this ruse is only ever artificially sustained by further borrowing (alleged borrowing/phony loans) that perpetually reflates a forever deficient circulation with irreversible multiplications of falsified debt, without ever increasing the remaining volume of circulation above or beyond the principal representation we initially create as new money (principal only) in all private debt.
Public debt, however, is just reflating circulation with already stolen money, formerly stolen in all private debt & then laundered back into circulation by political betrayers as every increase in public debt, making any or all taxation under banking a further crime of theft yet again to service but never ever pay down public debt, until such time of course in the coming second greater depression when industry & commerce can no longer service the ever greater escalations of falsified debt, both public & private.
Who am not only writing this in Christ spirit but an expert in a mathematically perfected economy which you don’t have by the way, & never will so long as you’re all robbing each other only to pay it all to an even bigger thief.
Its only when you all openly admit guilt & take some self responsibility for your own actions is when we can unite & actually fix this lie we all call an economy today, NOT BEFORE & we can finally govern ourselves united, free from exploitation, without the unjust intervention of thieving banks, or any regulation imposed by politicians, phony economists or bureaucrats who clearly failed primary school mathematics.
I am David acting in my own God given sovereign rite, leading myself by example only, so others may learn from the teachings of my heart & likewise lead themselves teaching others to do the same, following none other but the GOOD faith in ones very own heart & soul, always endeavoring doing then what is ethically & morally right, regardless of belief, religion, race or creed.
Please note this is my own personal reflection I’m NOW sharing with the world & it may not necessarily be the opinion of all other MPE advocates.
Australia for Mathematically Perfected Economy™ 